Armonia Rigsby et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
Filing
38
JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: Defendants County of Los Angeles, Deborah De La Parra, and Kary Ikemoto's motion for summary judgment is granted on the the ground that no disputed issues of material fact exist for trial on Plaintiffs Rigsby an d J.R.'s federal claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of right of privacy for juvenile records. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants County of Los Angeles, Deborah De La Parra, and Kary Ikemoto dismissing Plaintiffs Rigsby and J.R.'s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ir)
1
2
3
JS-6
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
Armonia Rigsby, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
v.
15
County of Los Angeles, et al.,
16
17
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. CV 11-02766 SJO (PJWx)
JUDGMENT
18
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants County of Los
20
Angeles, Deborah De La Parra, and Kary Ikemoto's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted on
21
the ground that no disputed issues of material fact exist for trial on Plaintiffs Rigsby and J.R.'s
22
federal claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of right of privacy for juvenile records.
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
1
Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants County of Los Angeles, Deborah De La Parra,
2
and Kary Ikemoto dismissing Plaintiffs Rigsby and J.R.'s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim.
3
IT IS SO ADJUDGED.
4
5
Dated: August 2, 2011.
6
7
S. JAMES OTERO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?