Unimax Express, Inc. v. Cosco North America, Inc. et al

Filing 49

ORDER DISMISSING CASE 46 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Based upon the foregoing Joint Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal, Without Prejudice, for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Each side is to bear its own costs and attorneys fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jre)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Richard D. McCune, State Bar No. 132124
[e-mail]
David C. Wright, State Bar No. 177468
[e-mail]
(Eddie) Jae K. Kim, State Bar No. 216308
[e-mail]
MCCUNEWRIGHT LLP
2068 Orange Tree Lane, Suite 216
Redlands, California 92374
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Edward J. Chong, State Bar No. 201409
[e-mail]
Law Offices of Edward J. Chong and Associates
3325 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1250
Los Angeles, California 90010
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

JS-6

Attorneys for Plaintiff UNIMAX EXPRESS, INC.,
on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated

12
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

UNIMAX EXPRESS, INC., and on behalf )
of all others similarly situated,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
COSCO NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
)
COSCO CONTAINER LINES
)
AMERICA, INC., and DOES 1-10,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: CV 11-02947 DDP (PLAx)
Judge Assigned: Judge Dean D. Pregerson
ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION

Complaint Filed: April 7, 2011
Trial Date: None Set
Current Class Certification Filing
Deadline; October 19, 2012

28
-1JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR
LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
Case No.: CV11-2947 DDP (PLAx)

1

ORDER

2

Based upon the foregoing Joint Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal, Without

3

Prejudice, for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, and good cause appearing,

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, WITHOUT

5

PREJUDICE, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Each side is to bear its own costs

6

and attorneys’ fees.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

Dated: October 23, 2012

10
11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR
LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
Case No.: CV11-2947 DDP (PLAx)