Nadine Hays v. Transportation Security Administration (TSA), et al

Filing 314

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT RE: DEFENDANTS ALBARO AND GREEN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITEDSTATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Dolly M. Gee for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 278 . P ursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the motionfor summary judgment, the records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those p ortions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Albaro and Green'smotion for summary judgment is granted. (jy)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NADINE HAYS, Plaintiff, 11 12 v. 13 TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 11-3198-DMG (PJW) ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT RE: DEFENDANTS ALBARO AND GREEN’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the motion 17 for summary judgment, the records on file herein, and the Report and 18 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. 19 Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report 20 and Recommendation to which objections have been made. 21 accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and 22 adopts them as its own findings and conclusions. 23 24 Further, the The Court IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Albaro and Green’s motion for summary judgment is granted. 25 26 DATED: July 22, 2014 27 28 DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?