Warren Eric Armstead v. Harvey Lappin et al

Filing 95

JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. IT IS ADJUDGED that Defendant Patels motion for summary judgment is granted. The remainder of Plaintiffs Complaint is dismissed in accordance with the Courts previous orders in this action, except as to the claim for which the motion for summary judgment is denied as set forth in the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation. (Docket # 89.) Related to: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment 94 (vm)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WARREN ERIC ARMSTEAD, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 vs. Plaintiff, HARVEY LAPPIN, et al., Defendant. __________________________ ) Case No. CV 11-3363 CAS (MRW) ) ) ) JUDGMENT ) ) ) ) ) ) Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that Defendant Patel’s motion for summary judgment is granted. The remainder of Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed in accordance with the Court’s previous orders in this action, except as to the claim for which the motion for summary judgment is denied as set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. (Docket # 89.) 24 25 DATE: July 18, 2013 26 27 28 ___________________________________ HON. CHRISTINA A. SNYDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?