Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC et al v. Sweet Blessings Corp. et al

Filing 12

PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER filed by Judge George H. King: Defendants Sweet Blessings Corp. and Douglas Haw (collectively, Defendants), and each of their employees, agents, representatives, attorneys, accountants, and other persons associated, in conc ert or participation with them are hereby permanently enjoined from holding themselves out as franchisees of Baskin-Robbins, and shall not, directly or indirectly, represent to the public or hold themselves out as present of Baskin-Robbins. Defendants shall have fourteen (14) days from service of this Order to comply with each and every one of the terms set forth herein. (See document for further specific details) (ir)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 FILED: 10-18-2011 Judith B. Gitterman, Bar No. 115661 Gabriel Liao, Bar No. 205897 Vilma Palma-Solana, Bar No. 267992 PERKINS COIE LLP 1888 Century Park E., Suite 1700 Los Angeles, CA 90067-1721 NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT Telephone: 310.788.9900 Facsimile: 310.788.3399 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC; Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC; BR IP Holder LLC; and DB Real Estate Assets I LLC 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISED SHOPS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISING LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; BR IP HOLDER LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and DB REAL ESTATE ASSETS I LLC, 20 21 22 23 [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER Date: Time: Ctrm: Judge: October 17, 2011 9:30 a.m. 650 Hon. George H. King Plaintiffs, 18 19 Case No. CV 11-03387-GHK(PJWx) v. SWEET BLESSINGS CORP., a California corporation; and DOUGLAS HAW, an individual, Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 28028-4541.0001/LEGAL21646574.1 [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants Sweet Blessings Corp. and Douglas Haw (collectively, “Defendants”), and each of their employees, agents, representatives, attorneys, accountants, and other persons associated, in concert or participation with them are hereby permanently enjoined from holding themselves out as franchisees of BaskinRobbins, and shall not, directly or indirectly, represent to the public or hold themselves out as present or former franchisees of Baskin-Robbins; 2. Defendants are hereby permanently enjoined from using, in advertising or in any other manner whatsoever, and from disclosing, revealing, or publishing, any feature or method associated with Baskin-Robbins’ specially designed buildings, equipment, accessories, identification schemes, products, management programs, standards, specifications and proprietary marks, all known as the BaskinRobbins System, any name or mark containing the designation “Baskin-Robbins”, any names or marks registered by Baskin-Robbins (collectively, “Baskin-Robbins Marks”) and any other trade secrets, confidential information, operating manuals, slogans, trade dress, signs, symbols or devices which are part of the BaskinRobbins System; 3. Defendants are hereby permanently enjoined from possessing and shall immediately return to Baskin-Robbins all operating manuals, plans, specifications, and other materials in Defendants’ possession containing information prepared by Baskin-Robbins, and all copies thereof, and shall retain no copy or record of any of the foregoing, except Defendants’ copy of the Franchise Agreements, any correspondence between the parties, and any other documents which Defendants reasonably need for compliance with any provision of law; 4. Defendants are hereby permanently enjoined from displaying at the premises of the stores located at 5884 The Old Road, Stevenson Ranch, California; 18827 Soledad Canyon Road, Canyon Country, California; and at 23432 Lyons 28 28028-4541.0001/LEGAL21646574.1 -1- [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER 1 Avenue, Newhall, California (the “Stores”) or at any other location, and on any 2 equipment, interior signs, trade fixtures, furnishings and other personal property 3 any of the Baskin-Robbins Marks or other indicia of Baskin-Robbins. Furthermore, 4 Defendants shall disconnect, withdraw and/or terminate any telephone listings 5 and/or fictitious name registration containing any part of the Baskin-Robbins 6 Marks, at Defendants’ expense and in a manner satisfactory to Baskin-Robbins. 7 Upon Baskin-Robbins’ written demand, however, Defendants shall assign to 8 Baskin-Robbins any telephone number used in the operation of the Stores if such 9 number is listed in the directory using any of the Baskin-Robbins Marks; 5. 10 Defendants are hereby permanently enjoined from possessing and shall 11 immediately destroy or surrender to Baskin-Robbins all signs, stationery, forms, 12 printed matter, advertising, and paper goods containing the Baskin-Robbins Marks 13 and any name or mark containing the designation “Baskin-Robbins” and every 14 other deceptively similar name and mark, or any other designation indicating or 15 intending to indicate that they are an authorized Baskin-Robbins franchisee; 6. 16 Defendants shall make such modifications or alterations to the Stores’ 17 premises as may be necessary to distinguish the appearance of the premises from 18 that of units in the Baskin-Robbins System, at Defendants’ expense and in a manner 19 satisfactory to Baskin-Robbins; 7. 20 Defendants are hereby permanently enjoined from using, in connection 21 with any business or the promotion thereof, any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or 22 colorable imitation of any of Baskin-Robbins Marks or trade dress; and Defendants 23 shall not utilize any designation of origin or description or representation which 24 falsely suggests or represents any association or connection with Baskin-Robbins. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 28028-4541.0001/LEGAL21646574.1 -2- [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER 1 8. Defendants shall have fourteen (14) days from service of this Order to 2 comply with each and every one of the terms set forth herein. 3 DATED: October 18, 2011 4 5 Hon. George H. King United States District Court Judge 6 7 8 Submitted by: 9 PERKINS COIE LLP 10 11 12 13 14 By /s/ Gabriel Liao Gabriel Liao, Attorneys for Plaintiffs Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC; Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC; BR IP Holder LLC; and DB Real Estate Assets I LLC 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 28028-4541.0001/LEGAL21646574.1 -3- [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER 1 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL 2 I am a citizen of the United States and employed in Los Angeles County, 3 California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled 4 action. My business address is 1888 Century Park East, Suite 1700, Los Angeles, 5 California 90067-1721. I am readily familiar with this firm’s practice for 6 collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States 7 Postal Service. On August 31, 2011, I placed with this firm at the above address 8 for deposit with the United States Postal Service a true and correct copy of the 9 within document(s): 10 [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 in a sealed envelope, postage fully paid, addressed as follows: Sweet Blessing Corp. c/o Douglas Haw agent for service of process 25884 The Old Road Santa Clarita, CA 91381 Douglas Haw 25884 The Old Road Santa Clarita, CA 91381 Following ordinary business practices, the envelope was sealed and placed for collection and mailing on this date, and would, in the ordinary course of business, be deposited with the United States Postal Service on this date. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. Executed on August 31, 2011, at Los Angeles, California. 23 24 Sharon Jones 25 26 27 28 28028-4541.0001/LEGAL21646574.1 -4- [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?