Kaneka Corporation v. SKC Kolon PI, Inc. et al

Filing 774

MINUTES OF DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW 750 DEFENDANTS AND COUNTERCLAIMANTS MOTION FOR ORDER FOR PROVISIONAL MOTION UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 52 FOR ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION REGARDING IMPLIED LICENSE 751 PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION 757 DEFENDANTS AND COUNTERCLAIMANTS MOTION TO RE-TAX COSTS 765 Hearing held before Judge Jesus G. Bernal: The matters are taken under submission. Court Reporter: Phyllis Preston. (ad)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title 2:11-cv-03397-JGB(RZx) Date December 4, 2017 Kaneka Corporation v. SKC Kolon PI, Inc. et al Present: The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Gabriela Garcia Phyllis Preston Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): Anthony J. Dain Dave Deonarine Frederick K. Taylor Raymond K. Chan Cecilia Sanabria Charles H. Suh Mindy L. Ehrenfried J. Michael Jakes Anand Sharma Proceedings: DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW [750] DEFENDANTS AND COUNTERCLAIMANTS’ MOTION FOR ORDER FOR PROVISIONAL MOTION UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 52 FOR ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION REGARDING IMPLIED LICENSE [751] PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION [757] DEFENDANTS AND COUNTERCLAIMANTS’ MOTION TO RE-TAX COSTS [765] The Court and counsel confer. The Court hears oral argument on the Defendant and Counterclaimant’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law [750], Defendants and Counterclaimants’ Motion for Order for Provisional Motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 52 for additional findings and conclusion regarding implied license [751], Plaintiff’s Motion for Permanent Injunction [757], and Defendants and Counterclaimants’ Motion to Re-Tax Costs [765]. The matters are taken under submission. CC: Time: 00:31 / GGA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?