Kaneka Corporation v. SKC Kolon PI, Inc. et al
Filing
774
MINUTES OF DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW 750 DEFENDANTS AND COUNTERCLAIMANTS MOTION FOR ORDER FOR PROVISIONAL MOTION UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 52 FOR ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION REGARDING IMPLIED LICENSE 751 PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION 757 DEFENDANTS AND COUNTERCLAIMANTS MOTION TO RE-TAX COSTS 765 Hearing held before Judge Jesus G. Bernal: The matters are taken under submission. Court Reporter: Phyllis Preston. (ad)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
Title
2:11-cv-03397-JGB(RZx)
Date
December 4, 2017
Kaneka Corporation v. SKC Kolon PI, Inc. et al
Present: The Honorable
JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Gabriela Garcia
Phyllis Preston
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):
Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):
Anthony J. Dain
Dave Deonarine
Frederick K. Taylor
Raymond K. Chan
Cecilia Sanabria
Charles H. Suh
Mindy L. Ehrenfried
J. Michael Jakes
Anand Sharma
Proceedings:
DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANTS’ MOTION FOR
JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW [750]
DEFENDANTS AND COUNTERCLAIMANTS’ MOTION FOR
ORDER FOR PROVISIONAL MOTION UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 52
FOR ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION REGARDING
IMPLIED LICENSE [751]
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION [757]
DEFENDANTS AND COUNTERCLAIMANTS’ MOTION TO RE-TAX
COSTS [765]
The Court and counsel confer. The Court hears oral argument on the Defendant and
Counterclaimant’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law [750], Defendants and
Counterclaimants’ Motion for Order for Provisional Motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 52 for
additional findings and conclusion regarding implied license [751], Plaintiff’s Motion for
Permanent Injunction [757], and Defendants and Counterclaimants’ Motion to Re-Tax Costs
[765]. The matters are taken under submission.
CC:
Time: 00:31 / GGA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?