Amanda Georgino v. Sur La Table Inc et al

Filing 44

ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS, AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE ENHANCEMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: The Settlement and the Settlement Ag reement are hereby approved as fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the Class, and the requirements of due process and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 have been satisfied. The parties are ordered and directed to comply with the terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Court has reviewed the application for an award of fees, costs, and expenses submitted by Class Counsel and the exhibits, memoranda of law, and other materials submitted in support of that applic ation. After review, the Court finds that Class Counsel shall be awarded $378,773.50 in fees and $13,071.82 in costs; the Court also awards the Class Representatives $12,000 in incentive awards, to be divided equally among them. The Ac tion and the claims alleged therein are hereby ordered dismissed with prejudice. Without in any way affecting the finality of this Order and the final Judgment, this Court hereby retains jurisdiction as to all matters relating to the interpretation, administration, and consummation of the Settlement Agreement., in favor of Amanda Georgino against Sur La Table Inc in the principal amount of $0.00, interest in the amount of $0.00, attorneys fees of $378,773.50, costs of $13,071.82 for a total judgment of $0.00. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)

JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Hunton & Williams LLP

550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

AMANDA GEORGINO, an individual, Case No.: 2:11-CV-03522-MMM-JEM
on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated,
CLASS ACTION
Plaintiff,
vs.
SUR LA TABLE, INC., a Washington
corporation; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,

ORDER AND JUDGMENT
GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL
TO CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT, ATTORNEYS’
FEES AND COSTS, AND CLASS
REPRESENTATIVE
ENHANCEMENT

Defendants.
AND CONSOLIDATED CASES

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

1

The Court has (1) reviewed and considered the terms and conditions of the

2

proposed Settlement as set forth in the Settlement Agreement ; (2) reviewed and

3

considered the application of Class Counsel for an award of attorneys' fees, costs,

4

expenses, and incentive awards; (3) held a Final Approval Hearing after being

5

satisfied that notice to the Class has been provided in accordance with the Court's

6

Order Granting Preliminary Approval to Proposed Class Settlement entered on

7

December 11, 2012 (the "Preliminary Approval Order"); (4) taken into account the

8

presentations and other proceedings at the Final Approval Hearing; and (5) considered

9

the Settlement in the context of all prior proceedings had in this litigation.

Hunton & Williams LLP

550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627

10

Accordingly, the Court enters the following FINDINGS and CONCLUSIONS:

11

A.

The Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this Action and all acts

12

within this Action, and over all the parties to this Action, including all members of the

13

Class.

14

B.

The Class conditionally certified in the Preliminary Approval Order has

15

been appropriately certified for settlement purposes. Class Counsel and the Class

16

Representatives have fairly and adequately represented the Class for purposes of

17

entering into and implementing the Settlement.

18

C.

The notice to putative Class Members was comprised of individual

19

mailed and emailed notice to all Known Class Members and steps taken to provide

20

notice to unknown Class Members. The Court finds that this notice (i) constituted the

21

best notice practicable under the circumstances, (ii) constituted notice that was

22

reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise the putative Class Members

23

of the pendency of the Action, and of their right to object and to appear at the Final

24

Approval Hearing or to exclude themselves from the Settlement, (iii) was reasonable

25

and constituted due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all persons entitled to be

26

provided with notice, and (iv) fully complied with due process principles and Federal

27

Rule of Civil Procedure 23.

28

///
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

1

D.

The Court has held a Final Approval Hearing to consider the fairness,

2

reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement and has been advised that there have

3

been no objections to the Settlement.

4

E.

The Settlement is the product of good faith, arm's-length negotiations

5

between the Class Representatives and Class Counsel, on the one hand, and Defendant

6

and its counsel, on the other hand.

7

F.

The Settlement, as provided for in the Settlement Agreement, is in all

8

respects fair, reasonable, adequate, and proper, and in the best interest of the Class. In

9

reaching this conclusion, the Court considered a number of factors, including: [1] the

Hunton & Williams LLP

550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627

10

strength of Plaintiffs' case; [2] the risk, expense, complexity, and likely duration of

11

further litigation; [3] the risk of maintaining class action status throughout the trial; [4]

12

the amount offered in settlement; [5] the extent of discovery completed, and the stage

13

of the proceedings; [6] the experience and views of counsel; [7] the presence of a

14

governmental participant; and [8] the reaction of the class members to the proposed

15

settlement. See Torrisi v. Tucson Elec. Power Co., 8 F.3d 1370, 1375 (9th Cir. 1993).

16

G.

A list of those putative Class Members who have timely elected to opt

17

out of the Settlement and the Class, and who are therefore not bound by the

18

Settlement, the provisions of the Settlement Agreement, this Order and the final

19

Judgment to be entered by the Clerk of the Court hereon, has been submitted to the

20

Court in the Declaration of Michael E. Hamer, filed in advance of the Final Approval

21

Hearing. All Class Members (as permanently certified below) shall be subject to all

22

of the provisions of the Settlement, the Settlement Agreement, this Order, and final

23

Judgment to be entered by the Clerk of the Court.

24

On the basis of the foregoing findings and conclusions, as well as the

25

submissions and proceedings referred to above, NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:

27

///

28

///
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

1
2

Certification of Class and Approval of Settlement
1.

The Settlement and the Settlement Agreement are hereby approved as

3

fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the Class, and the requirements

4

of due process and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 have been satisfied. The

5

parties are ordered and directed to comply with the terms and provisions of the

6

Settlement Agreement.

7

2.

The Court having found that each of the elements of Federal Rules of

8

Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(3) are satisfied, for purposes of settlement only, the

9

Class is permanently certified pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, on

Hunton & Williams LLP

550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627

10

behalf of the following persons:

11

All individuals who used a credit card issued for consumer credit purposes

12

to purchase goods or services from one of Defendant's retail stores (either in

13

person or over the phone) in the State of California during the period of time

14

between February 16, 2010 through February 11, 2011, and whose personal

15

identification information was requested and recorded by Defendant for any

16

reason other than a special order, installation, or delivery.

17

The Class Members identified in the exhibits attached to the Declaration of Michael E.

18

Hamer submitted to the Court as having timely and properly elected to opt out from

19

the Settlement and the Class are hereby excluded from the Class and shall not be

20

entitled to any of the benefits afforded to the Class Members under the Settlement

21

Agreement. The Court readopts and incorporates herein by reference its preliminary

22

conclusions as to the satisfaction of Rules 23(a) and (b)(3) set forth in the Preliminary

23

Approval Order and notes again that because this certification of the Class is in

24

connection with the Settlement rather than litigation, the Court need not address any

25

issues of manageability that may be presented by certification of the class proposed in

26

the Settlement.

27

3.

28

For purposes of Settlement only, the named Plaintiffs are certified as

representatives of the Class and Class Counsel is appointed counsel to the Class. The
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

1

Court concludes that Class Counsel and the Class Representatives have fairly and

2

adequately represented the Class with respect to the Settlement and the Settlement

3

Agreement.

4

4.

Notwithstanding the certification of the foregoing Class and appointment

5

of the Class Representatives for purposes of effecting the Settlement, if this Order is

6

reversed on appeal or the Settlement Agreement is terminated or is not consummated

7

for any reason, the foregoing certification of the Class and appointment of the Class

8

Representatives shall be void and of no further effect, and the parties to the proposed

9

Settlement shall be returned to the status each occupied before entry of this Order

Hunton & Williams LLP

550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627

10

without prejudice to any legal argument that any of the parties to the Settlement

11

Agreement might have asserted but for the Settlement Agreement.

12
13

Release and Injunctions Against Released Claims
5.

Plaintiffs and Class Members shall and hereby do fully and irrevocably

14

release, waive, and discharge Defendant and each of its respective past, present and

15

future owners, stockholders, parent corporations, related or affiliated companies,

16

subsidiaries, officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents, principals, heirs,

17

representatives, accountants, attorneys, auditors, consultants, insurers and reinsurers,

18

and their respective successors and predecessors in interest, from any and all past,

19

present, and future liabilities, claims, causes of action (whether in contract, tort, or

20

otherwise, including statutory, common law, property, and equitable claims),

21

damages, costs, attorneys’ fees, losses, or demands, whether known or unknown,

22

existing or potential, or suspected or unsuspected, which Plaintiffs and all

23

Participating Class Members have or may have arising out of or relating to any act,

24

omission, or other conduct alleged in the Action that has or could have been alleged or

25

otherwise referred to in the Action (the “Released Claims”).

26

6.

With respect to the Released Claims, Plaintiffs and all Participating Class

27

Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Final Judgment shall have,

28

expressly waived and relinquished, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the
4
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

1

provisions, rights and benefits of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, or any

2

other similar provision under federal or state law that purports to limit the scope of the

3

general release. Section 1542 provides:

4

A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO
CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW
OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME
OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN
BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS
SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.

5
6
7
8

Applications for Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses and

9

Representative Plaintiff Incentive Award

Hunton & Williams LLP

550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627

10
11

7.

The Court has reviewed the application for an award of fees, costs, and

12

expenses submitted by Class Counsel and the exhibits, memoranda of law, and other

13

materials submitted in support of that application. After review, the Court finds that

14

Class Counsel shall be awarded $378,773.50 in fees and $13,071.82 in costs; the

15

Court also awards the Class Representatives $12,000 in incentive awards, to be

16

divided equally among them.

17
18

Other Provisions
8.

Neither the Settlement Agreement nor any provision therein, nor any

19

negotiations, statements or proceedings in connection therewith shall be construed as,

20

or be deemed to be evidence of, an admission or concession on the part of the

21

Plaintiffs, any Class Member, Defendant, or any other person of any liability or

22

wrongdoing by them, or that the claims and defenses that have been, or could have

23

been, asserted in the Action are or are not meritorious, and this Order, the Settlement

24

Agreement or any such communications shall not be offered or received in evidence

25

in any action or proceeding, or be used in any way as an admission or concession or

26

evidence of any liability or wrongdoing of any nature or that Plaintiffs, any Class

27

Member, or any other person has suffered any damage; provided, however, that the

28

Settlement Agreement, this Order, and the final Judgment to be entered thereon may
5
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

1

be filed in any action by Defendant or Class Members seeking to enforce the

2

Settlement Agreement or the final Judgment by injunctive or other relief, or to assert

3

defenses including, but not limited to, res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good

4

faith settlement, or any theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar

5

defense or counterclaim. The Settlement Agreement's terms shall be forever binding

6

on, and shall have res judicata and preclusive effect in, all pending and future actions

7

or other proceedings as to Released Claims and other prohibitions set forth in this

8

Order that are maintained by, or on behalf of, the Class Members or any other person

9

subject to the provisions of this Order.

Hunton & Williams LLP

550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627

10

9.

In the event that the Settlement Agreement does not become effective or

11

is canceled or terminated in accordance with the terms and provisions of the

12

Settlement Agreement, then this Order and the final Judgment shall be rendered null

13

and void and be vacated and all orders entered in connection therewith by this Court

14

shall be rendered null and void.

15

Dismissal; Continuing Jurisdiction

16

10.

17

with prejudice.

18

11.

The Action and the claims alleged therein are hereby ordered dismissed

Without in any way affecting the finality of this Order and the final

19

Judgment, this Court hereby retains jurisdiction as to all matters relating to the

20

interpretation, administration, and consummation of the Settlement Agreement.

21

///

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

Dated: May 9, 2013

25

________________________________
MARGARET M. MORROW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26
27
28
6
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT