Amanda Georgino v. Sur La Table Inc et al
Filing
44
ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS, AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE ENHANCEMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: The Settlement and the Settlement Ag reement are hereby approved as fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the Class, and the requirements of due process and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 have been satisfied. The parties are ordered and directed to comply with the terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Court has reviewed the application for an award of fees, costs, and expenses submitted by Class Counsel and the exhibits, memoranda of law, and other materials submitted in support of that applic ation. After review, the Court finds that Class Counsel shall be awarded $378,773.50 in fees and $13,071.82 in costs; the Court also awards the Class Representatives $12,000 in incentive awards, to be divided equally among them. The Ac tion and the claims alleged therein are hereby ordered dismissed with prejudice. Without in any way affecting the finality of this Order and the final Judgment, this Court hereby retains jurisdiction as to all matters relating to the interpretation, administration, and consummation of the Settlement Agreement., in favor of Amanda Georgino against Sur La Table Inc in the principal amount of $0.00, interest in the amount of $0.00, attorneys fees of $378,773.50, costs of $13,071.82 for a total judgment of $0.00. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Hunton & Williams LLP
550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
AMANDA GEORGINO, an individual, Case No.: 2:11-CV-03522-MMM-JEM
on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated,
CLASS ACTION
Plaintiff,
vs.
SUR LA TABLE, INC., a Washington
corporation; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL
TO CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT, ATTORNEYS’
FEES AND COSTS, AND CLASS
REPRESENTATIVE
ENHANCEMENT
Defendants.
AND CONSOLIDATED CASES
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
1
The Court has (1) reviewed and considered the terms and conditions of the
2
proposed Settlement as set forth in the Settlement Agreement ; (2) reviewed and
3
considered the application of Class Counsel for an award of attorneys' fees, costs,
4
expenses, and incentive awards; (3) held a Final Approval Hearing after being
5
satisfied that notice to the Class has been provided in accordance with the Court's
6
Order Granting Preliminary Approval to Proposed Class Settlement entered on
7
December 11, 2012 (the "Preliminary Approval Order"); (4) taken into account the
8
presentations and other proceedings at the Final Approval Hearing; and (5) considered
9
the Settlement in the context of all prior proceedings had in this litigation.
Hunton & Williams LLP
550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
10
Accordingly, the Court enters the following FINDINGS and CONCLUSIONS:
11
A.
The Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this Action and all acts
12
within this Action, and over all the parties to this Action, including all members of the
13
Class.
14
B.
The Class conditionally certified in the Preliminary Approval Order has
15
been appropriately certified for settlement purposes. Class Counsel and the Class
16
Representatives have fairly and adequately represented the Class for purposes of
17
entering into and implementing the Settlement.
18
C.
The notice to putative Class Members was comprised of individual
19
mailed and emailed notice to all Known Class Members and steps taken to provide
20
notice to unknown Class Members. The Court finds that this notice (i) constituted the
21
best notice practicable under the circumstances, (ii) constituted notice that was
22
reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise the putative Class Members
23
of the pendency of the Action, and of their right to object and to appear at the Final
24
Approval Hearing or to exclude themselves from the Settlement, (iii) was reasonable
25
and constituted due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all persons entitled to be
26
provided with notice, and (iv) fully complied with due process principles and Federal
27
Rule of Civil Procedure 23.
28
///
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
1
D.
The Court has held a Final Approval Hearing to consider the fairness,
2
reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement and has been advised that there have
3
been no objections to the Settlement.
4
E.
The Settlement is the product of good faith, arm's-length negotiations
5
between the Class Representatives and Class Counsel, on the one hand, and Defendant
6
and its counsel, on the other hand.
7
F.
The Settlement, as provided for in the Settlement Agreement, is in all
8
respects fair, reasonable, adequate, and proper, and in the best interest of the Class. In
9
reaching this conclusion, the Court considered a number of factors, including: [1] the
Hunton & Williams LLP
550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
10
strength of Plaintiffs' case; [2] the risk, expense, complexity, and likely duration of
11
further litigation; [3] the risk of maintaining class action status throughout the trial; [4]
12
the amount offered in settlement; [5] the extent of discovery completed, and the stage
13
of the proceedings; [6] the experience and views of counsel; [7] the presence of a
14
governmental participant; and [8] the reaction of the class members to the proposed
15
settlement. See Torrisi v. Tucson Elec. Power Co., 8 F.3d 1370, 1375 (9th Cir. 1993).
16
G.
A list of those putative Class Members who have timely elected to opt
17
out of the Settlement and the Class, and who are therefore not bound by the
18
Settlement, the provisions of the Settlement Agreement, this Order and the final
19
Judgment to be entered by the Clerk of the Court hereon, has been submitted to the
20
Court in the Declaration of Michael E. Hamer, filed in advance of the Final Approval
21
Hearing. All Class Members (as permanently certified below) shall be subject to all
22
of the provisions of the Settlement, the Settlement Agreement, this Order, and final
23
Judgment to be entered by the Clerk of the Court.
24
On the basis of the foregoing findings and conclusions, as well as the
25
submissions and proceedings referred to above, NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:
27
///
28
///
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
1
2
Certification of Class and Approval of Settlement
1.
The Settlement and the Settlement Agreement are hereby approved as
3
fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the Class, and the requirements
4
of due process and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 have been satisfied. The
5
parties are ordered and directed to comply with the terms and provisions of the
6
Settlement Agreement.
7
2.
The Court having found that each of the elements of Federal Rules of
8
Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(3) are satisfied, for purposes of settlement only, the
9
Class is permanently certified pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, on
Hunton & Williams LLP
550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
10
behalf of the following persons:
11
All individuals who used a credit card issued for consumer credit purposes
12
to purchase goods or services from one of Defendant's retail stores (either in
13
person or over the phone) in the State of California during the period of time
14
between February 16, 2010 through February 11, 2011, and whose personal
15
identification information was requested and recorded by Defendant for any
16
reason other than a special order, installation, or delivery.
17
The Class Members identified in the exhibits attached to the Declaration of Michael E.
18
Hamer submitted to the Court as having timely and properly elected to opt out from
19
the Settlement and the Class are hereby excluded from the Class and shall not be
20
entitled to any of the benefits afforded to the Class Members under the Settlement
21
Agreement. The Court readopts and incorporates herein by reference its preliminary
22
conclusions as to the satisfaction of Rules 23(a) and (b)(3) set forth in the Preliminary
23
Approval Order and notes again that because this certification of the Class is in
24
connection with the Settlement rather than litigation, the Court need not address any
25
issues of manageability that may be presented by certification of the class proposed in
26
the Settlement.
27
3.
28
For purposes of Settlement only, the named Plaintiffs are certified as
representatives of the Class and Class Counsel is appointed counsel to the Class. The
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
1
Court concludes that Class Counsel and the Class Representatives have fairly and
2
adequately represented the Class with respect to the Settlement and the Settlement
3
Agreement.
4
4.
Notwithstanding the certification of the foregoing Class and appointment
5
of the Class Representatives for purposes of effecting the Settlement, if this Order is
6
reversed on appeal or the Settlement Agreement is terminated or is not consummated
7
for any reason, the foregoing certification of the Class and appointment of the Class
8
Representatives shall be void and of no further effect, and the parties to the proposed
9
Settlement shall be returned to the status each occupied before entry of this Order
Hunton & Williams LLP
550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
10
without prejudice to any legal argument that any of the parties to the Settlement
11
Agreement might have asserted but for the Settlement Agreement.
12
13
Release and Injunctions Against Released Claims
5.
Plaintiffs and Class Members shall and hereby do fully and irrevocably
14
release, waive, and discharge Defendant and each of its respective past, present and
15
future owners, stockholders, parent corporations, related or affiliated companies,
16
subsidiaries, officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents, principals, heirs,
17
representatives, accountants, attorneys, auditors, consultants, insurers and reinsurers,
18
and their respective successors and predecessors in interest, from any and all past,
19
present, and future liabilities, claims, causes of action (whether in contract, tort, or
20
otherwise, including statutory, common law, property, and equitable claims),
21
damages, costs, attorneys’ fees, losses, or demands, whether known or unknown,
22
existing or potential, or suspected or unsuspected, which Plaintiffs and all
23
Participating Class Members have or may have arising out of or relating to any act,
24
omission, or other conduct alleged in the Action that has or could have been alleged or
25
otherwise referred to in the Action (the “Released Claims”).
26
6.
With respect to the Released Claims, Plaintiffs and all Participating Class
27
Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Final Judgment shall have,
28
expressly waived and relinquished, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the
4
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
1
provisions, rights and benefits of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, or any
2
other similar provision under federal or state law that purports to limit the scope of the
3
general release. Section 1542 provides:
4
A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO
CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW
OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME
OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN
BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS
SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.
5
6
7
8
Applications for Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses and
9
Representative Plaintiff Incentive Award
Hunton & Williams LLP
550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
10
11
7.
The Court has reviewed the application for an award of fees, costs, and
12
expenses submitted by Class Counsel and the exhibits, memoranda of law, and other
13
materials submitted in support of that application. After review, the Court finds that
14
Class Counsel shall be awarded $378,773.50 in fees and $13,071.82 in costs; the
15
Court also awards the Class Representatives $12,000 in incentive awards, to be
16
divided equally among them.
17
18
Other Provisions
8.
Neither the Settlement Agreement nor any provision therein, nor any
19
negotiations, statements or proceedings in connection therewith shall be construed as,
20
or be deemed to be evidence of, an admission or concession on the part of the
21
Plaintiffs, any Class Member, Defendant, or any other person of any liability or
22
wrongdoing by them, or that the claims and defenses that have been, or could have
23
been, asserted in the Action are or are not meritorious, and this Order, the Settlement
24
Agreement or any such communications shall not be offered or received in evidence
25
in any action or proceeding, or be used in any way as an admission or concession or
26
evidence of any liability or wrongdoing of any nature or that Plaintiffs, any Class
27
Member, or any other person has suffered any damage; provided, however, that the
28
Settlement Agreement, this Order, and the final Judgment to be entered thereon may
5
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
1
be filed in any action by Defendant or Class Members seeking to enforce the
2
Settlement Agreement or the final Judgment by injunctive or other relief, or to assert
3
defenses including, but not limited to, res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good
4
faith settlement, or any theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar
5
defense or counterclaim. The Settlement Agreement's terms shall be forever binding
6
on, and shall have res judicata and preclusive effect in, all pending and future actions
7
or other proceedings as to Released Claims and other prohibitions set forth in this
8
Order that are maintained by, or on behalf of, the Class Members or any other person
9
subject to the provisions of this Order.
Hunton & Williams LLP
550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
10
9.
In the event that the Settlement Agreement does not become effective or
11
is canceled or terminated in accordance with the terms and provisions of the
12
Settlement Agreement, then this Order and the final Judgment shall be rendered null
13
and void and be vacated and all orders entered in connection therewith by this Court
14
shall be rendered null and void.
15
Dismissal; Continuing Jurisdiction
16
10.
17
with prejudice.
18
11.
The Action and the claims alleged therein are hereby ordered dismissed
Without in any way affecting the finality of this Order and the final
19
Judgment, this Court hereby retains jurisdiction as to all matters relating to the
20
interpretation, administration, and consummation of the Settlement Agreement.
21
///
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
Dated: May 9, 2013
25
________________________________
MARGARET M. MORROW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
6
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?