DC Comics v. Mark Towle et al
Filing
7
ORDER by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: granting 6 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Order Authorizing Service of Process on Defendant by Publication and Mail and Request for Enlargement of Time Within Which to Effect Service. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is granted as follows: 1) Service of the summons in this action on Defendant shall be accomplished by publication in the Orange County Register, a newspaper published in the State of California, and designated as the newspaper most likely to give actual notice to Defendant; 2) The publication shall be made once a week for four (4) successive weeks, pursuant to California Government Code § 6064; 3) Plaintiff shall concurrently mail a copy of the summons, complaint and order for publication to both the last known address for Defendant and the address of Defendant's counsel; 4) This order does not preclude service upon Defendant in any other manner authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which service supersedes the service by publication; and 5) Plaintiff shall have a sixty (60) day enlargement of time within which to serve Defendant, and in no event later than November 2, 2011. (lom)
5
J. Andrew Coombs (SBN 123881)
andy@coombspc.com
Nicole L. Drey (SBN 250235)
nicole@coombspc.com
J. Andrew Coombs, A Prof. Corp.
517 East Wilson Avenue, Suite 202
Glendale, California 91206
Telephone: (818) 500-3200
Facsimile: (818) 500-3201
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff DC Comics
1
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
Mark Towle, an individual and doing
)
business as Gotham Garage, and Does 1 - )
10, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
DC Comics,
Case No. CV11-03934 RSWL (OPx)
ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR ORDER
AUTHORIZING SERVICE OF
PROCESS ON DEFENDANT BY
PUBLICATION AND MAIL AND
REQUEST FOR ENLARGEMENT
OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO
EFFECT SERVICE
18
19
The Court has read and considered all papers filed in connection with Plaintiff
20
DC Comics’ (“Plaintiff”) Ex Parte Application for Order Authorizing Service of
21
Process on Defendant by Publication and Mail and Request for Enlargement of Time
22
Within Which to Effect Service (“Application”), and it appears to the satisfaction of
23
the Court that Defendant Mark Towle, an individual and doing business as Gotham
24
Garage (“Defendant”), cannot be served with reasonable diligence in any other
25
manner set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 415.10 through 415.40.
26
The Court also finds that Plaintiff has stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of
27
action against Defendant.
28
DC Comics v. Towle: [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff’s Ex
Parte Application
-1-
1
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is granted as
2
follows:
3
1)
4
publication in the Orange County Register, a newspaper published in the State of
5
California, and designated as the newspaper most likely to give actual notice to
6
Defendant.
7
2)
8
pursuant to California Government Code § 6064.
9
3)
Service of the summons in this action on Defendant shall be accomplished by
The publication shall be made once a week for four (4) successive weeks,
Plaintiff shall concurrently mail a copy of the summons, complaint and order
10
for publication to both the last known address for Defendant and the address of
11
Defendant’s counsel.
12
4)
13
authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which service supersedes the
14
service by publication.
15
5)
16
Defendant, and in no event later than November 2, 2011.
This order does not preclude service upon Defendant in any other manner
Plaintiff shall have a sixty (60) day enlargement of time within which to serve
17
18
RONALD S.W. LEW
Dated: September 6, 2011
________________________________
Hon. Ronald S.W. Lew
District Judge, United States District
Court, Central District of California
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DC Comics v. Towle: [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff’s Ex
Parte Application
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?