Farideh Shemirani v. U S Department of Homeland Security, Citizenship and Immigartion Services

Filing 8

ORDER granting 6 Motion to Remand Case to U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) Modified on 8/31/2011 (lc).

Download PDF
1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FARIDEH SHEMIRANI, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Defendants. ___________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 11-04123 DDP (Ex) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND [Motion filed on 8/11/11] 17 18 Presently before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Remand to 19 the Agency for Adjudication. 20 opposition, the court GRANTS the motion. Because Plaintiff has not filed any 21 Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an 22 opposing party to file an opposition to any motion at least twenty- 23 one (21) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion. 24 C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-9. 25 “[t]he failure to file any required paper, or the failure to file 26 it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or 27 denial of the motion.” 28 /// Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-12. 1 The hearing on Defendant’s motion was set for September 12, 2 2011. Plaintiff’s opposition was therefore due by August 22, 2011. 3 As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed an 4 opposition, or any other filing that could be construed as a 5 request for a continuance. 6 Plaintiff’s failure to oppose as consent to granting the motion to 7 remand, and GRANTS the motion. Accordingly, the court deems 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 Dated: August 31, 2011 DEAN D. PREGERSON United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?