Lorean Barrera v. Pharmavite LLC

Filing 436

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court finds that the Motion for Final Approval of Settlement 431 should be GRANTED. For settlement purposes only, the Court appoints the following attorneys to act as Lead Settlement Class Counsel: Elaine A. Ryan, Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman & Balint PC, and Stewart M. Weltman, Siprut PC. The Court appoints the Named Plaintiff as representative of the Settlement Class. The Court makes the following awards to Plaintiff and Settlement Cla ss Counsel: (a) $3,475,000.00 as attorneys' fees collectively to Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint, P.C., Siprut, PC, Boodell & Domanskis, LLC, Levin Sedran & Berman, and Westerman Law Corp. (b) $600,000.00 as costs collectively to Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint, P.C., Siprut, PC, Boodell & Domanskis, LLC, Levin Sedran & Berman, and Westerman Law Corp. (c) $10,000.00 as an incentive award to the Class Representative. See document for other details. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 LOREAN BARRERA, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 v. CASE NO. 2:11-cv-04153-CAS (AGrx) CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER PHARMAVITE, LLC, a California limited liability company Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 2:11-cv-04153-CAS (AGrx) FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER 1 Plaintiff Lorean Barrera and Defendant Pharmavite LLC (collectively, the 2 “Parties”) have entered into a Settlement Agreement and General Release 3 (“Settlement Agreement”) to settle this Litigation, which the Court preliminarily 4 approved on June 6, 2017 (Dkt. 423). Plaintiff Barrera has filed an Unopposed 5 Motion for Final Approval of Settlement and a Memorandum in Support of 6 Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Settlement (collectively, “Motion for Final 7 Approval”). The Settlement Agreement, the exhibits thereto, and the exhibits to the 8 Motion for Final Approval, set forth the terms and conditions for a proposed 9 settlement and dismissal with prejudice of this Litigation. 10 Having reviewed the Settlement Agreement and its exhibits, the Motion for 11 Final Approval, the pleadings and other papers on file in this action, and statements 12 of counsel, and having held a Fairness Hearing on the fairness, adequacy, and 13 reasonableness of the settlement and considered all of the written submissions and 14 oral arguments made in connection with final settlement approval, the Court finds 15 that the Motion for Final Approval should be GRANTED and that this Final 16 Approval Order should be entered. Terms and phrases used in this Final Approval 17 Order shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Settlement Agreement. 18 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 19 1. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Settlement Class: All residents of the United States who purchased for personal use, and not resale or distribution, a Covered Product between May 1, 2007 and June 6, 2017. Specifically excluded from the Settlement Class are the following persons: (i) Pharmavite and its respective affiliates, employees, officers, directors, agents, and representatives, and their immediate family members; (ii) Settlement Class Counsel and partners, attorneys, and employees of their law firms; and (iii) The judges who have presided over the Litigation or mediated the Settlement, and their immediate family members. 27 28 For settlement purposes only, the Court certifies the following 1 CASE NO. 2:11-cv-04153-CAS (AGrx) FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 2. For settlement purposes only, the Court appoints the following attorneys to act as Lead Settlement Class Counsel: Elaine A. Ryan BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT, P.C. 2325 East Camelback Road, Suite 300 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Telephone: (602) 274-1100 Stewart M. Weltman SIPRUT, PC 17 North State Street, Suite 1600 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Telephone: (312) 236-0000 7 8 3. For settlement purposes only, the Court appoints the following attorneys 9 as Settlement Class Counsel. Settlement Class Counsel are experienced in class 10 litigation, including litigation of similar claims in other cases, and have fairly and 11 adequately protected the interests of the Settlement Class: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Elaine A. Ryan BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT, P.C. 2325 East Camelback Road, Suite 300 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Telephone: (602) 274-1100 Stewart M. Weltman SIPRUT, PC 17 N. State Street Suite 1600 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Telephone: (312) 236-0000 Max A. Stein BOODELL & DOMANSKIS, LLC One North Franklin, Suite 1200 Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: (312) 938-1670 Howard J. Sedran LEVIN FISHBEIN SEDRAN & BERMAN 510 Walnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 hsedran@lfsblaw.com Telephone: (215) 592-1500 22 23 24 25 26 WESTERMAN LAW CORP. Jeff S. Westerman (94559) 1875 Century Park East, Suite 2200 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Tel: (310) 698-7880 27 28 2 CASE NO. 2:11-cv-04153-CAS (AGrx) FINAL APPROVAL ORDER 1 2 3 4. For settlement purposes only, the Court appoints the Named Plaintiff as representative of the Settlement Class. 5. The Court finds that notice to the Settlement Class has been provided in 4 accordance with the Court’s Preliminary Approval Order. This notice, in form, 5 method, and content, fully complied with the requirements of Rule 23 and due 6 process, constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and 7 constituted due and sufficient notice to all persons entitled to notice of the settlement. 8 6. The settlement set forth in the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, 9 adequate, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class. The Settlement Agreement 10 was arrived at through good-faith bargaining at arm’s-length, without collusion, 11 conducted by counsel with substantial experience in prosecuting and resolving 12 consumer class actions. The settlement consideration provided under the Settlement 13 Agreement constitutes fair value given in exchange for the release of the Released 14 Claims against the Released Parties. The consideration to be provided to members of 15 the Settlement Class is reasonable, considering the facts and circumstances of the 16 numerous types of claims and affirmative defenses asserted in the Litigation, and in 17 light of the complexity, expense, and duration of litigation and the risks involved in 18 establishing liability and damages and in maintaining the class action through trial and 19 appeal. All terms of the settlement and Settlement Agreement are approved by this 20 Final Approval Order. The fact that this Final Approval Order specifically identifies 21 or summarily recapitulates some, but not other, provisions of the Settlement 22 Agreement does not modify any provision of the Settlement Agreement, nor does it 23 elevate or demote any provision vis á vis any other provision, nor does it create an 24 inference in that regard. 25 7. All Settlement Class members who failed to submit an objection to the 26 settlement in accordance with the deadline and procedure set forth in the Preliminary 27 Approval Order are deemed to have waived and are forever foreclosed from raising 28 3 CASE NO. 2:11-cv-04153-CAS (AGrx) FINAL APPROVAL ORDER 1 the objection and are foreclosed from seeking any adjudication or review of the 2 Settlement Agreement by appeal or by any other means. 3 8. Any Settlement Class Member who has not submitted a complete and 4 timely Claim Form in compliance with the Settlement Agreement and the Court’s 5 Preliminary Approval Order shall not be entitled to any benefits under the settlement, 6 but, unless they have opted out, nonetheless shall be barred by the Release and 7 provisions of the Settlement Agreement and the Final Order and Judgment. 8 9. The Court orders that any member of the Settlement Class who has not 9 submitted a timely, written request for exclusion from the Settlement Class (i.e., 10 become an Opt-Out) as directed in the Preliminary Approval Order is bound by all 11 proceedings, orders, and judgments in the Litigation, even if such Settlement Class 12 Member has previously initiated or subsequently initiates individual litigation or other 13 proceedings encompassed by the Release (as set forth in Section VII Paragraphs D - F 14 of the Settlement Agreement). 15 10. The Parties, the Released Parties, and each Settlement Class member 16 have irrevocably submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction of this Court for any suit, 17 action, proceeding, or dispute relating in any way to, or arising out of, the Released 18 Claims, the Settlement Agreement, or this Final Judgment and Order. 19 11. The Parties are directed to consummate the Settlement Agreement in 20 accordance with its terms. The Parties and any and all Settlement Class members who 21 did not timely exclude themselves from the Settlement Class are bound by the terms 22 and conditions of the Settlement Agreement. 23 12. The requirements of Rule 23(a) and (b)(3) have been satisfied for 24 purposes of settlement. The Settlement Class is so numerous that joinder of all 25 members is impracticable; there are questions of law or fact common to the 26 Settlement Class; the claims of the Plaintiff are typical of the claims of the Settlement 27 Class; the Plaintiff has, and Settlement Class Counsel have fairly and adequately 28 protected the interests of the Settlement Class, and will fairly and adequately protect 4 CASE NO. 2:11-cv-04153-CAS (AGrx) FINAL APPROVAL ORDER 1 the interests of the Settlement Class; and the questions of law or fact common to 2 Settlement Class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual 3 members. 4 13. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement, this 5 Court hereby dismisses the Litigation with prejudice as to all Released Parties, without 6 fees or costs, except as provided in the Settlement Agreement. 7 14. By operation of this Final Judgment and Order, the Releasing Parties 8 release and forever discharge the Released Parties from the Released Claims, and the 9 Released Parties release and forever discharge Plaintiff and Settlement Class Counsel, 10 11 as set forth in Section IX, Paragraphs B and C of the Settlement Agreement. 15. Pharmavite shall not be required to recall, relabel, repackage, remove 12 from shelves, or pull or withdraw from distribution or inventory any Covered 13 Products that have been manufactured or shipped by Pharmavite prior to the date 14 starting 180 days after the Effective Date. 15 16. Neither the Settlement Agreement, nor any of its provisions, nor any of 16 the documents (including but not limited to drafts of the Settlement Agreement, this 17 Preliminary Approval Order, or the Final Order and Judgment), negotiations, or 18 proceedings relating in any way to the Settlement, shall be construed as or deemed to 19 be evidence of an admission or concession by any person, including Pharmavite, and 20 shall not be offered or received in evidence, or subject to discovery, in this or any 21 other action or proceeding except in an action brought to enforce its terms or except 22 as may be required by law or Court order. 23 24 17. The Court makes the following awards to Plaintiff and Settlement Class Counsel: 25 a. $ 3,475,000.00 as attorneys’ fees collectively to Bonnett, Fairbourn, 26 Friedman & Balint, P.C., Siprut, PC, Boodell & Domanskis, LLC, Levin 27 Sedran & Berman, and Westerman Law Corp. 28 b. $ 600,000.00 as costs collectively to Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint, 5 CASE NO. 2:11-cv-04153-CAS (AGrx) FINAL APPROVAL ORDER 1 P.C., Siprut, PC, Boodell & Domanskis, LLC, Levin Sedran & Berman, and 2 Westerman Law Corp. 3 c. $ 10,000.00 as an incentive award to the Class Representative. 4 In accordance with the Settlement Agreement, these amounts shall be paid to the 5 escrow/trust account of Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman, & Balint, P.C. for further 6 distribution to Plaintiff and Settlement Class Counsel. 7 8 9 18. Without further order of the Court, the Parties may agree to reasonable extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Settlement Agreement. 19. Neither Settlement Class Counsel's applications for an incentive award, 10 attorneys' fees, and reimbursement of expenses, nor any order or proceedings relating 11 to such applications, nor any appeal from any order relating thereto or reversal or 12 modification thereof, shall in any way affect or delay the finality of this Judgment, and 13 all such matters shall be considered separate from this Final Judgment and Order. 14 20. Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment and Order, the 15 Court retains exclusive jurisdiction over this action, the Parties, and all Settlement 16 Class members to determine all matters relating in any way to the Final Judgment and 17 Order, the Preliminary Approval Order, or the Settlement Agreement, including but 18 not limited to the administration, implementation, interpretation, or enforcement of 19 such orders or Agreement. 20 21. Based upon the Court's finding that there is no just reason for delay of 21 enforcement or appeal of this Order notwithstanding the Court's retention of 22 jurisdiction to oversee implementation and enforcement of the Settlement Agreement, 23 the Court directs the Clerk to enter final judgment. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 Dated: December 4, 2017 Hon. Christina A. Snyder U.S. District Judge 28 6 CASE NO. 2:11-cv-04153-CAS (AGrx) FINAL APPROVAL ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?