Lorean Barrera v. Pharmavite LLC
Filing
436
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court finds that the Motion for Final Approval of Settlement 431 should be GRANTED. For settlement purposes only, the Court appoints the following attorneys to act as Lead Settlement Class Counsel: Elaine A. Ryan, Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman & Balint PC, and Stewart M. Weltman, Siprut PC. The Court appoints the Named Plaintiff as representative of the Settlement Class. The Court makes the following awards to Plaintiff and Settlement Cla ss Counsel: (a) $3,475,000.00 as attorneys' fees collectively to Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint, P.C., Siprut, PC, Boodell & Domanskis, LLC, Levin Sedran & Berman, and Westerman Law Corp. (b) $600,000.00 as costs collectively to Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint, P.C., Siprut, PC, Boodell & Domanskis, LLC, Levin Sedran & Berman, and Westerman Law Corp. (c) $10,000.00 as an incentive award to the Class Representative. See document for other details. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
LOREAN BARRERA, On Behalf of
Herself and All Others Similarly
Situated,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
v.
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-04153-CAS (AGrx)
CLASS ACTION
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND
ORDER
PHARMAVITE, LLC, a California
limited liability company
Defendant.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-04153-CAS (AGrx) FINAL
JUDGMENT AND ORDER
1
Plaintiff Lorean Barrera and Defendant Pharmavite LLC (collectively, the
2
“Parties”) have entered into a Settlement Agreement and General Release
3
(“Settlement Agreement”) to settle this Litigation, which the Court preliminarily
4
approved on June 6, 2017 (Dkt. 423). Plaintiff Barrera has filed an Unopposed
5
Motion for Final Approval of Settlement and a Memorandum in Support of
6
Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Settlement (collectively, “Motion for Final
7
Approval”). The Settlement Agreement, the exhibits thereto, and the exhibits to the
8
Motion for Final Approval, set forth the terms and conditions for a proposed
9
settlement and dismissal with prejudice of this Litigation.
10
Having reviewed the Settlement Agreement and its exhibits, the Motion for
11
Final Approval, the pleadings and other papers on file in this action, and statements
12
of counsel, and having held a Fairness Hearing on the fairness, adequacy, and
13
reasonableness of the settlement and considered all of the written submissions and
14
oral arguments made in connection with final settlement approval, the Court finds
15
that the Motion for Final Approval should be GRANTED and that this Final
16
Approval Order should be entered. Terms and phrases used in this Final Approval
17
Order shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Settlement Agreement.
18
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
19
1.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Settlement Class:
All residents of the United States who purchased for personal use, and not
resale or distribution, a Covered Product between May 1, 2007 and June 6,
2017.
Specifically excluded from the Settlement Class are the following persons:
(i)
Pharmavite and its respective affiliates, employees, officers, directors,
agents, and representatives, and their immediate family members;
(ii)
Settlement Class Counsel and partners, attorneys, and employees of their
law firms; and
(iii)
The judges who have presided over the Litigation or mediated the
Settlement, and their immediate family members.
27
28
For settlement purposes only, the Court certifies the following
1
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-04153-CAS (AGrx) FINAL
JUDGMENT AND ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
2.
For settlement purposes only, the Court appoints the following attorneys
to act as Lead Settlement Class Counsel:
Elaine A. Ryan
BONNETT, FAIRBOURN,
FRIEDMAN & BALINT, P.C.
2325 East Camelback Road, Suite
300
Phoenix, Arizona 85016
Telephone: (602) 274-1100
Stewart M. Weltman
SIPRUT, PC
17 North State Street, Suite 1600
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Telephone: (312) 236-0000
7
8
3.
For settlement purposes only, the Court appoints the following attorneys
9
as Settlement Class Counsel. Settlement Class Counsel are experienced in class
10
litigation, including litigation of similar claims in other cases, and have fairly and
11
adequately protected the interests of the Settlement Class:
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Elaine A. Ryan
BONNETT, FAIRBOURN,
FRIEDMAN
& BALINT, P.C.
2325 East Camelback Road, Suite 300
Phoenix, Arizona 85016
Telephone: (602) 274-1100
Stewart M. Weltman
SIPRUT, PC
17 N. State Street
Suite 1600
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Telephone: (312) 236-0000
Max A. Stein
BOODELL & DOMANSKIS, LLC
One North Franklin, Suite 1200
Chicago, IL 60606
Telephone: (312) 938-1670
Howard J. Sedran
LEVIN FISHBEIN SEDRAN &
BERMAN
510 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106
hsedran@lfsblaw.com
Telephone: (215) 592-1500
22
23
24
25
26
WESTERMAN LAW CORP.
Jeff S. Westerman (94559)
1875 Century Park East, Suite 2200
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: (310) 698-7880
27
28
2
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-04153-CAS (AGrx) FINAL
APPROVAL ORDER
1
2
3
4.
For settlement purposes only, the Court appoints the Named Plaintiff as
representative of the Settlement Class.
5.
The Court finds that notice to the Settlement Class has been provided in
4
accordance with the Court’s Preliminary Approval Order. This notice, in form,
5
method, and content, fully complied with the requirements of Rule 23 and due
6
process, constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and
7
constituted due and sufficient notice to all persons entitled to notice of the settlement.
8
6.
The settlement set forth in the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable,
9
adequate, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class. The Settlement Agreement
10
was arrived at through good-faith bargaining at arm’s-length, without collusion,
11
conducted by counsel with substantial experience in prosecuting and resolving
12
consumer class actions. The settlement consideration provided under the Settlement
13
Agreement constitutes fair value given in exchange for the release of the Released
14
Claims against the Released Parties. The consideration to be provided to members of
15
the Settlement Class is reasonable, considering the facts and circumstances of the
16
numerous types of claims and affirmative defenses asserted in the Litigation, and in
17
light of the complexity, expense, and duration of litigation and the risks involved in
18
establishing liability and damages and in maintaining the class action through trial and
19
appeal. All terms of the settlement and Settlement Agreement are approved by this
20
Final Approval Order. The fact that this Final Approval Order specifically identifies
21
or summarily recapitulates some, but not other, provisions of the Settlement
22
Agreement does not modify any provision of the Settlement Agreement, nor does it
23
elevate or demote any provision vis á vis any other provision, nor does it create an
24
inference in that regard.
25
7.
All Settlement Class members who failed to submit an objection to the
26
settlement in accordance with the deadline and procedure set forth in the Preliminary
27
Approval Order are deemed to have waived and are forever foreclosed from raising
28
3
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-04153-CAS (AGrx) FINAL
APPROVAL ORDER
1
the objection and are foreclosed from seeking any adjudication or review of the
2
Settlement Agreement by appeal or by any other means.
3
8.
Any Settlement Class Member who has not submitted a complete and
4
timely Claim Form in compliance with the Settlement Agreement and the Court’s
5
Preliminary Approval Order shall not be entitled to any benefits under the settlement,
6
but, unless they have opted out, nonetheless shall be barred by the Release and
7
provisions of the Settlement Agreement and the Final Order and Judgment.
8
9.
The Court orders that any member of the Settlement Class who has not
9
submitted a timely, written request for exclusion from the Settlement Class (i.e.,
10
become an Opt-Out) as directed in the Preliminary Approval Order is bound by all
11
proceedings, orders, and judgments in the Litigation, even if such Settlement Class
12
Member has previously initiated or subsequently initiates individual litigation or other
13
proceedings encompassed by the Release (as set forth in Section VII Paragraphs D - F
14
of the Settlement Agreement).
15
10.
The Parties, the Released Parties, and each Settlement Class member
16
have irrevocably submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction of this Court for any suit,
17
action, proceeding, or dispute relating in any way to, or arising out of, the Released
18
Claims, the Settlement Agreement, or this Final Judgment and Order.
19
11.
The Parties are directed to consummate the Settlement Agreement in
20
accordance with its terms. The Parties and any and all Settlement Class members who
21
did not timely exclude themselves from the Settlement Class are bound by the terms
22
and conditions of the Settlement Agreement.
23
12.
The requirements of Rule 23(a) and (b)(3) have been satisfied for
24
purposes of settlement. The Settlement Class is so numerous that joinder of all
25
members is impracticable; there are questions of law or fact common to the
26
Settlement Class; the claims of the Plaintiff are typical of the claims of the Settlement
27
Class; the Plaintiff has, and Settlement Class Counsel have fairly and adequately
28
protected the interests of the Settlement Class, and will fairly and adequately protect
4
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-04153-CAS (AGrx) FINAL
APPROVAL ORDER
1
the interests of the Settlement Class; and the questions of law or fact common to
2
Settlement Class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual
3
members.
4
13.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement, this
5
Court hereby dismisses the Litigation with prejudice as to all Released Parties, without
6
fees or costs, except as provided in the Settlement Agreement.
7
14.
By operation of this Final Judgment and Order, the Releasing Parties
8
release and forever discharge the Released Parties from the Released Claims, and the
9
Released Parties release and forever discharge Plaintiff and Settlement Class Counsel,
10
11
as set forth in Section IX, Paragraphs B and C of the Settlement Agreement.
15.
Pharmavite shall not be required to recall, relabel, repackage, remove
12
from shelves, or pull or withdraw from distribution or inventory any Covered
13
Products that have been manufactured or shipped by Pharmavite prior to the date
14
starting 180 days after the Effective Date.
15
16.
Neither the Settlement Agreement, nor any of its provisions, nor any of
16
the documents (including but not limited to drafts of the Settlement Agreement, this
17
Preliminary Approval Order, or the Final Order and Judgment), negotiations, or
18
proceedings relating in any way to the Settlement, shall be construed as or deemed to
19
be evidence of an admission or concession by any person, including Pharmavite, and
20
shall not be offered or received in evidence, or subject to discovery, in this or any
21
other action or proceeding except in an action brought to enforce its terms or except
22
as may be required by law or Court order.
23
24
17.
The Court makes the following awards to Plaintiff and Settlement Class
Counsel:
25
a. $ 3,475,000.00 as attorneys’ fees collectively to Bonnett, Fairbourn,
26
Friedman & Balint, P.C., Siprut, PC, Boodell & Domanskis, LLC, Levin
27
Sedran & Berman, and Westerman Law Corp.
28
b. $ 600,000.00 as costs collectively to Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint,
5
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-04153-CAS (AGrx) FINAL
APPROVAL ORDER
1
P.C., Siprut, PC, Boodell & Domanskis, LLC, Levin Sedran & Berman, and
2
Westerman Law Corp.
3
c. $ 10,000.00 as an incentive award to the Class Representative.
4
In accordance with the Settlement Agreement, these amounts shall be paid to the
5
escrow/trust account of Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman, & Balint, P.C. for further
6
distribution to Plaintiff and Settlement Class Counsel.
7
8
9
18.
Without further order of the Court, the Parties may agree to reasonable
extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Settlement Agreement.
19.
Neither Settlement Class Counsel's applications for an incentive award,
10
attorneys' fees, and reimbursement of expenses, nor any order or proceedings relating
11
to such applications, nor any appeal from any order relating thereto or reversal or
12
modification thereof, shall in any way affect or delay the finality of this Judgment, and
13
all such matters shall be considered separate from this Final Judgment and Order.
14
20.
Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment and Order, the
15
Court retains exclusive jurisdiction over this action, the Parties, and all Settlement
16
Class members to determine all matters relating in any way to the Final Judgment and
17
Order, the Preliminary Approval Order, or the Settlement Agreement, including but
18
not limited to the administration, implementation, interpretation, or enforcement of
19
such orders or Agreement.
20
21.
Based upon the Court's finding that there is no just reason for delay of
21
enforcement or appeal of this Order notwithstanding the Court's retention of
22
jurisdiction to oversee implementation and enforcement of the Settlement Agreement,
23
the Court directs the Clerk to enter final judgment.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
Dated: December 4, 2017
Hon. Christina A. Snyder
U.S. District Judge
28
6
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-04153-CAS (AGrx) FINAL
APPROVAL ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?