Edgar Franco v. Susan D Hubbard

Filing 30

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Dolly M. Gee Re Report and Recommendation 25 : Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition with prejudice. (ad)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

EDGAR FRANCO,

12
13
14
15

vs.

DAVID B. LONG, Warden, and
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of
CDCR,
Respondents.

16
17

Petitioner,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV 11-4368-DMG (DTB)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records

18 and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
19 Judge. Objections and Supplemental Objections to the Report and Recommendation
20 have been filed herein. Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the
21 Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs
22 with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate
23 Judge.
24

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the

25 Petition with prejudice.
26 DATED: January 6, 2014
27

DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
1