Terrance D Rutherford v. FIA Card Services, N.A. et al
Filing
86
JUDGMENT :The Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Defendants FIA Card Services, N.A., Alaska Airlines, Inc., and Horizon Air Industries, Inc. and against Plaintiff Terrance D. Rutherford. Plaintiff take nothing from this action and that the action be dismissed with prejudice. by Judge Dean D. Pregerson Related to: MOTION for Judgment 77 (lc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
ROBERT S. STERN (CA SBN 68240)
RStern@mofo.com
TRITIA M. MURATA (CA SBN 234344)
TMurata@mofo.com
MEGAN T. LOW (CA SBN 265497)
MLow@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 3500
Los Angeles, California 90013-1024
Telephone: (213) 892-5200
Facsimile: (213) 892-5454
Attorneys for Defendant
FIA CARD SERVICES, N.A.
CLOSED
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
TERRANCE D. RUTHERFORD,
individually and on behalf of other
similarly situated individuals,
17
18
JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
15
16
Case No. CV 11-04433 DDP (MANx)
Hearing Date:
Hearing Time:
v.
FIA CARD SERVICES, N.A. (Bank of
America), ALASKA AIRLINES, INC.
and HORIZON AIR INDUSTRIES,
INC.,
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Judgment
la-1193533
February 4, 2013
10:00 a.m.
Judge:
Hon. Dean D. Pregerson
Courtroom: 3 (Spring)
[LINK TO DOCKET NUMBER 77]
1
2
JUDGMENT
The Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Defendants FIA Card Services,
3
N.A., Alaska Airlines, Inc., and Horizon Air Industries, Inc. and against Plaintiff
4
Terrance D. Rutherford for the reasons set forth in the Court’s order granting
5
Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 75) and
6
denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. No. 76).
7
8
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff take nothing from this action and
that the action be dismissed with prejudice.
9
10
Dated: January 29, 2013
11
12
13
Hon. Dean D. Pregerson
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Judgment
la-1193533
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?