Terrance D Rutherford v. FIA Card Services, N.A. et al

Filing 86

JUDGMENT :The Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Defendants FIA Card Services, N.A., Alaska Airlines, Inc., and Horizon Air Industries, Inc. and against Plaintiff Terrance D. Rutherford. Plaintiff take nothing from this action and that the action be dismissed with prejudice. by Judge Dean D. Pregerson Related to: MOTION for Judgment 77 (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ROBERT S. STERN (CA SBN 68240) RStern@mofo.com TRITIA M. MURATA (CA SBN 234344) TMurata@mofo.com MEGAN T. LOW (CA SBN 265497) MLow@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, California 90013-1024 Telephone: (213) 892-5200 Facsimile: (213) 892-5454 Attorneys for Defendant FIA CARD SERVICES, N.A. CLOSED 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 TERRANCE D. RUTHERFORD, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals, 17 18 JUDGMENT Plaintiff, 15 16 Case No. CV 11-04433 DDP (MANx) Hearing Date: Hearing Time: v. FIA CARD SERVICES, N.A. (Bank of America), ALASKA AIRLINES, INC. and HORIZON AIR INDUSTRIES, INC., 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Judgment la-1193533 February 4, 2013 10:00 a.m. Judge: Hon. Dean D. Pregerson Courtroom: 3 (Spring) [LINK TO DOCKET NUMBER 77] 1 2 JUDGMENT The Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Defendants FIA Card Services, 3 N.A., Alaska Airlines, Inc., and Horizon Air Industries, Inc. and against Plaintiff 4 Terrance D. Rutherford for the reasons set forth in the Court’s order granting 5 Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 75) and 6 denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. No. 76). 7 8 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff take nothing from this action and that the action be dismissed with prejudice. 9 10 Dated: January 29, 2013 11 12 13 Hon. Dean D. Pregerson 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Judgment la-1193533 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?