CAMOFI Master LDC et al v. Jerrold Pressman et al

Filing 388

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Judge by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file and the Report and Recommendation 348 of the United States Magistrate Judge on Plaint iffs Motion for Sanctions. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions 324 is granted; and (2) default be entered pursuant to Rule 37(b)(2)(A) against defendants Michael Goldberg, Kenneth Koock, Charles Arnold, John C. Kirkland, ADI, Richard Berkshire, TUSA, Daisy Rodriguez, KC-X, and the Estate of Richard Fixaris. See Order for details. (jtil)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 CAMOFI MASTER LDC, et al., Plaintiffs, 7 CASE NO. CV 11-4574-JLS (SPx) 8 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DIRECTING THAT DEFAULT BE ENTERED AGAINST CERTAIN DEFENDANTS vs. 9 10 Jerrold Pressman, et al., Defendants. 11 12 13 14 and U.S. Aerospace, Inc., Nominal Defendant. 15 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file and 18 the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge on 19 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Sanctions. (Doc. 348.) Further, the Court has engaged in a de 20 novo review of those portions of the Report to which certain Defendants have 21 objected. Specifically, Defendants Charles Arnold, Daisy Rodriguez, KC-X 22 American Aerospace, LLC, and TUSA Acquisition Corp. argue that as innocent 23 clients kept “in the dark” from their attorney’s misconduct, they should not be 24 subject to terminating sanctions. (See Doc. 365.) For the following reasons, these 25 objections do nothing to invalidate the Magistrate Judge’s determination that such 26 sanctions are warranted here. 27 28 1 1 First, the Ninth Circuit has made clear “[t]here is certainly no merit to the 2 contention that dismissal of [a party’s] claim because of his counsel’s unexcused 3 conduct imposes an unjust penalty on the client.” See Toth v. Trans World Airlines, 4 Inc., 862 F.2d 1381, 1387 (9th Cir. 1988) (quoting Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 5 370 U.S. 626, 633 (1962)). The Defendants here “voluntarily chose [their] attorney 6 as [their] representative in th[is] action, and [they] cannot now avoid the 7 consequences of the acts or omissions of this freely selected agent.” Id. (quoting 8 Link, 370 U.S. at 633-34). Second, upon reviewing the records on file, it appears 9 that these Defendants were aware of their attorney’s misconduct before Plaintiffs 10 filed their motion for sanctions. The Court therefore finds no reason to challenge 11 the Magistrate Judge’s determination. Nor do the objections of the other affected 12 Defendants, which speak to the five-factor framework of terminating sanctions, 13 (Doc. 367), alter the Court’s conclusion. Accordingly, the Court accepts the 14 findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 15 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Sanctions 16 (Doc. 324) is granted; and (2) default be entered pursuant to Rule 37(b)(2)(A) 17 against defendants Michael Goldberg, Kenneth Koock, Charles Arnold, John C. 18 Kirkland, ADI, Richard Berkshire, TUSA, Daisy Rodriguez, KC-X, and the Estate 19 of Richard Fixaris. 20 21 22 23 DATED: January 26, 2016 24 ___________________________________ HONORABLE JOSEPHINE L. STATON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?