Freshco Foodservice, Inc. v. United Distributors, Inc. et al

Filing 81

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Christina A. Snyder: In light of plaintiff's failure to appear at the status conference, and in the absence of any indication that plaintiff has retained new counsel, Court hereby orders plaintiff to show cause within 15 days (by 12/13/2011) why its complaint should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (kpa)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 11-4652 CAS (AJWx) Title FRESHCO FOOD SERVICE, INC. v. UNITED DISTRIBUTORS, INC., ET AL. Present: The Honorable Date November 28, 2011 CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE RITA SANCHEZ Deputy Clerk N/A Court Reporter / Recorder N/A Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: N/A N/A Proceedings: (In Chambers:) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE FAILURE TO PROSECUTE The Court finds this motion appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. On October 24, 2011, the Court granted motions to withdraw as attorneys filed by the former counsel for each plaintiff Freshco Food Service, Inc., and defendant and counterclaimant United Distributors, Inc. The Court admonished both parties that as corporate entities, they would not be allowed to proceed pro se pursuant to local rule 83-2.10.1. On November 28, 2011, the Court held a status conference regarding settlement. United Distributors’ president, William R. Gerard, appeared and informed the Court that United Distributors had retained new counsel who would be substituting into the case. Neither plaintiff nor counsel on plaintiff’s behalf appeared at the status conference. In light of plaintiff’s failure to appear at the status conference, and in the absence of any indication that plaintiff has retained new counsel, the Court hereby orders plaintiff to show cause within fifteen (15) days why its complaint should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 00 Initials of Preparer : 00 rs 1 The Court notes that Gerard indicated at the status conference that United Distributors, Inc. would dismiss its counterclaims concurrently with the dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint. CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 11-4652 CAS (AJWx) Title FRESHCO FOOD SERVICE, INC. v. UNITED DISTRIBUTORS, INC., ET AL. CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Date November 28, 2011 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?