Solutions for Utilities Inc et al v. California Public Utilities Commission et al

Filing 148

JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero :Defendants of California Public Utilities Commission, Catherine J K Sandoval, Mark J Ferron, Michael R Florio, Michael R Peevey, Timothy Alan Simon Motion for Summary Judgment on Claims 1 and 3 of the Second Amended Complaint is granted. Plaintiffs Solutions for Utilities, Inc., CAlifornians for Renewable Energy, Inc., Michael E. Boyd and Robert Sarvey take nothing, the action be dismissed in its entirety, and thatdefendants recover their costs.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

FRANK R. LINDH (SBN 157986)
HARVEY YALE MORRIS (SBN 87902)
ELIZABETH M. MCQUILLAN (SBN 106085)
[e-mail]
Public Utilities Commission
of the State of California
505 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California,
Michael R. Peevey, Timothy Alan Simon, Michel
Peter Florio, Catherine J.K. Sandoval, and Mark J. Ferron

JS-6

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14

SOLUTIONS FOR UTILITIES, INC.,
et al.,

15
16

Case No. CV11 04975 SJO (JCGx)
JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs,

Date: December 17, 2012
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Courtroom: Hon. S. James Otero

vs.

17

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES
18 COMMISSION, et al.
Defendants.
19
20
21
22

The Motion for Summary Judgment of defendants Public Utilities

23

Commission of the State of California (CPUC) and Commissioners Michael R.

24

Peevey, Timothy Alan Simon, Michel Peter Florio, Catherine J.K. Sandoval, and

25

Mark J. Ferron (collectively, the CPUC Defendants) came on for hearing on

26

December 17, 2012 before the Honorable S. James Otero.

27

The Court has considered the CPUC Defendants’ Motion for Summary

28

Judgment, the accompanying Memorandum of Points and Authorities, the Statement
1
JUDGMENT

1

of Uncontroverted Material Facts and Conclusions of Law, the Request for Judicial

2

Notice, the Declaration of Harvey Yale Morris, and all pleadings and papers on file

3

in this action, and the arguments of counsel presented on the hearing of this Motion.

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the CPUC Defendants’ Motion for

5

Summary Judgment on Claims 1 and 3 of the Second Amended Complaint is

6

granted.

7

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT plaintiffs Solutions for

8

Utilities, Inc., CAlifornians for Renewable Energy, Inc., Michael E. Boyd and

9

Robert Sarvey take nothing, the action be dismissed in its entirety, and that

10

defendants recover their costs.

11
12
13
14

Dated: January 03, 2013

___________________________

The Honorable S. James Otero
United States District Court Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JUDGMENT