Solutions for Utilities Inc et al v. California Public Utilities Commission et al

Filing 334

JUDGMENT by Judge John W. Holcomb. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows. The Seventh Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without leave to amend. Defendants California Public Utilities Commission and the current Commissioners of the C PUC shall have JUDGMENT in their favor, and AGAINST Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs shall take nothing by way of their Seventh Amended Complaint. This action is DISMISSED. Other than potential post- judgment remedies (including those provided in Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), to the extent that any party requests any other form of relief, such request is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (See Judgment for further details) (yl)

JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14

SOLUTIONS FOR UTILITIES, INC.,
a California corporation,
CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE
ENERGY, INC., a California NonProfit Corporation,
MICHAEL E. BOYD, and,
ROBERT SARVEY,
Plaintiffs,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

v.
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES
COMMISSION, an Independent
California State Agency,
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
CO., a California Corporation,
MARYBEL BATJER,
MARTHA GUZMAN ACEVES,
CLIFFORD RECHTSCHAFFEN,
GENEVIEVE SHIROMA, and
DARCIE L. HOUCK, in their official
and individual capacities as current
Public Utilities Commission of
California,
Defendants.

Case No. 2:11-CV-04975-JWH-JCG
JUDGMENT

1

Pursuant to the “Memorandum Opinion and Order (1) Granting Motion

2

of Defendants California Public Utilities Commission and Commissioners to

3

Dismiss Seventh Amended Complaint [ECF No. 316]; and (2) Denying

4

Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Leave to File Eighth Amended and Third

5

Supplemental Complaint [ECF No. 322]” entered substantially

6

contemporaneously herewith, and in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal

7

Rules of Civil Procedure,

8

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

9

1.

10
11

This Court possesses subject matter jurisdiction over the above-

captioned action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 16 U.S.C. §§ 824a-3, et seq.
2.

Plaintiffs Solutions for Utilities, Inc. and Californians for

12

Renewable Energy, Inc. were previously DISMISSED. Defendant Southern

13

California Edison Co. was previously DISMISSED.

14

3.

The operative pleading is the Seventh Amended Complaint [ECF

15

No. 298] filed by Plaintiffs Michael E. Boyd and Robert Sarvey (jointly,

16

“Plaintiffs”).

17

4.

The Seventh Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without leave

18

to amend. Defendants California Public Utilities Commission and the current

19

Commissioners of the CPUC shall have JUDGMENT in their favor, and

20

AGAINST Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs shall take nothing by way of their Seventh

21

Amended Complaint. This action is DISMISSED.

22

5.

Other than potential post-judgment remedies (including those

23

provided in Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), to the extent

24

that any party requests any other form of relief, such request is DENIED.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated:

March 13, 2023

John W. Holcomb
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-