Internet Brands Inc et al v. UltimateCoupons.com LLC et al

Filing 40

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle. Any confidential information or documents produced by or on behalf of any party or non-party as part of discovery in this action may be designated by the producing party(ies) as "CONFIDENTIAL " or "CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY." Any information that is publicly available should not be designated as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY." A document should be designated "CONFIDENTIAL" or "CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY". [SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS] 38 (gr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MICHAEL K. GRACE (SBN 126737) mgrace@gracelaw.com PAMELA D. DEITCHLE (SBN 222649) pdeitchle@gracelaw.com GRACE+GRACE LLP 790 E. Colorado Boulevard, Suite 797 Pasadena, CA 91101 Telephone: (626) 696-1555 Facsimile: (626) 696-1559 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants JAG Ventures, LLC f/k/a Ultimatecoupons.com, LLC; Jeffrey A. Grossman; and Andrew E. Kardon 10 Intellectual Property  790 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 797  Pasadena, CA  91101  Grace+Grace LLP  11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ) Case No.: CV 11-5358 CAS (CWx) ) ) [PROPOSED] ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ULTIMATECOUPONS.COM, LLC, et ) ) al.; ) ) Defendants. ) ) AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. ) ) INTERNET BRANDS, INC., a Delaware corporation, 24 25 26 27 28 PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), plaintiff and 2 counterdefendant Internet Brands, Inc. and Defendants and Counterclaimants 3 JAG Ventures, LLC f/k/a Ultimatecoupons.com, LLC; Jeffrey A. Grossman; and 4 Andrew E. Kardon (collectively, the “parties”), through the parties’ respective 5 counsel of record, have stipulated and agreed that discovery in this action (and 6 any further actions among these parties) may involve requests for the production 7 of information and documents that the responding parties consider to be 8 confidential, proprietary or competitively sensitive. The parties believe that a 9 protective order restricting the use and dissemination of confidential, proprietary, Intellectual Property  790 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 797  Pasadena, CA  91101  and competitively sensitive information and documents is necessary and 11 Grace+Grace LLP  10 appropriate to facilitate discovery and litigation in this action. The parties also 12 believe that such an order is necessary and appropriate to enable the parties to 13 conduct relevant discovery of non-parties that may have similar concerns 14 regarding their confidential, proprietary or competitively sensitive information 15 and documents. 16 GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THIS ORDER: The 17 parties have propounded discovery and it appears that many of the documents 18 subject to disclosure contain confidential, proprietary or competitively sensitive 19 information such that good cause exists to protect the disclosure of such 20 documents. These voluminous documents include, but are not limited to, 21 confidential commercial information, financial information, employee 22 information, customer information, contractor and vendor information, marketing 23 plans, business plans, license agreements, distribution agreements, development 24 information, budgets, profit and loss information, and corporate asset information 25 the disclosure of which could cause competitive harm to the producing party. 26 In determining the scope of information which a party may designate as its 27 confidential information, each party acknowledges the importance of client access 28 to all information material to client decision making in the prosecution or defense 1 PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 of litigation, and therefore agrees that designations of information as confidential 2 information and responses to requests to permit further disclosure of confidential 3 information shall be made in good faith and (1) not to impose a burden or delay 4 on an opposing party, or (2) not for tactical or other advantage in litigation. 5 Further, each party shall avoid as much as the possible inclusion of confidential 6 information in briefs and other captioned documents filed in court, in order to 7 minimize sealing and designating documents as such. 8 Accordingly, the IT IS ORDERED THAT: 9 1. Any confidential information or documents produced by or on behalf Intellectual Property  790 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 797  Pasadena, CA  91101  of any party or non-party as part of discovery in this action may be designated by 11 Grace+Grace LLP  10 the producing party(ies) as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – 12 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.” Any information that is publicly available should 13 not be designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – 14 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.” A document should be designated 15 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” 16 when it contains or reflects confidential business information, including but not 17 limited to information which the disclosing party or non-party believes in good 18 faith contains, constitutes or reveals confidential design, engineering or 19 development information, confidential commercial information, non-public 20 financial information, confidential or private information about current or former 21 employees, contractor or vendors (including employee, contractor and vendor 22 personnel records), or other information of a confidential, proprietary, private or 23 personal nature. 24 2. Information or documents designated “CONFIDENTIAL – 25 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” shall be limited to trade secrets (as defined in 26 California Civil Code § 3426.1) or other confidential commercial information, 27 including information that the disclosing party or non-party believes in good faith 28 will result in competitive disadvantage or harm if disclosed to another party or 2 PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 third party to this action and shall include marketing plans or strategies, business 2 plans, strategic plans, license agreements or negotiations, distribution agreements, 3 manufacturing agreements, engineering and manufacturing drawings, employee 4 files, customers’ identities and personal information, merchandising, research and 5 development of products not yet released or sold, correspondence and agreements 6 with actual or prospective customers or vendors, financial information or 7 projections, including, without limitation, budgets, revenue, profits, costs, 8 liabilities, or other documents relating to revenue earned and asset information 9 that is not public knowledge, and actual or prospective customer lists. 10 3. Information designated “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – Intellectual Property  790 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 797  Pasadena, CA  91101  Grace+Grace LLP  11 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” may be used only in connection with this 12 proceeding and not for any other purpose. Such information may not be disclosed 13 to anyone except as provided in this Protective Order. 14 4. Any party or non-party wishing to come within the provisions of this 15 Protective Order may designate in writing the documents (as defined in Fed. R. 16 Civ. P. 34 and Fed. R. Evid. 1001) or portions thereof that it considers 17 confidential at the time the documents are produced. Each page of the document 18 must be marked “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S 19 EYES ONLY” by the producing party, and any confidential documents 20 exchanged prior to this Protective Order being entered by the Court shall, within a 21 reasonable time hereafter, be so marked on each such page, if such markings do 22 not include every such page. It is the intent of the parties that each document 23 previously designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – 24 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” and transmitted to the respective other party, 25 including any such documents and information exchanged for settlement 26 purposes, are to be covered by this Protective Order. “CONFIDENTIAL” or 27 “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” documents or things that 28 3 PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 cannot be reasonably labeled pursuant to this paragraph shall be so designated by 2 the producing party by informing the receiving party in writing. 3 5. In the instance of deposition testimony, the witness under deposition 4 or his counsel shall invoke the provisions of this Protective Order in a timely 5 manner and designate the level of restriction. During the deposition, parties shall 6 be excluded from testimony designated “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S 7 EYES ONLY.” The witness under deposition or his counsel shall have the right, 8 within thirty days of receiving a transcript of the deposition, to designate, or 9 change, the confidentiality designation of the transcript or portions thereof. For Intellectual Property  790 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 797  Pasadena, CA  91101  depositions with some confidential and some non-confidential documents or 11 Grace+Grace LLP  10 testimony, a separate confidential transcript, apart from the usual transcript, shall 12 be prepared by the court reporter and counsel for the party asserting that certain 13 documents or testimony is confidential. 14 6. Any documents, discovery responses or deposition transcripts 15 stamped “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY,” as well as any 16 copies or excerpts thereof, or analyses or reports that pertain thereto, and any 17 deposition testimony or portion thereof marked as “CONFIDENTIAL” or 18 “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” may be made available only 19 to: 20 21 a. such attorneys on a need to know basis; 22 23 b. Judges, law clerks and other personnel of the Court before which this proceeding is pending; 24 25 Attorneys of record for the receiving party and employees of c. Independent experts and consultants retained by the attorneys for purposes of the litigation that are not directly associated with a party 26 d. 27 Court reporters and their staff that are required to transcribe testimony; and 28 4 PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 e. Outside litigation support vendors, including commercial photocopying vendors, scanning services vendors, coders and keyboard operators. 3 7. Any documents, discovery responses or deposition transcripts 4 stamped “CONFIDENTIAL,” as well as any copies or excerpts thereof, or 5 analyses or reports that pertain thereto, and any deposition testimony or portion 6 thereof marked as “CONFIDENTIAL,” may be made available only to: 7 a. A party, or any officer, director, or employee of a party 8 deemed necessary by counsel to aid in the prosecution, defense, or settlement of 9 this action; 10 Intellectual Property  790 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 797  Pasadena, CA  91101  Grace+Grace LLP  11 b. such attorneys on a need to know basis; 12 13 c. Judges, law clerks and other personnel of the Court before which this proceeding is pending; 14 15 Attorneys of record for the receiving party and employees of d. Independent experts and consultants retained by the attorneys for purposes of the litigation that are not directly associated with a party; 16 e. 17 testimony; and 18 f. 19 Court reporters and their staff that are required to transcribe Outside litigation support vendors, including commercial photocopying vendors, scanning services vendors, coders and keyboard operators. 20 8. For purposes of this Protective Order, an expert witness shall not be 21 deemed to be “independent” if he or she is (a) a party to this litigation, or an 22 officer, shareholder, owner, manager, partner, agent distributor, seller, 23 representative, advertiser, promoter, independent contractor, affiliate, director, 24 employee, former employee or contractor, or relative of a party to this litigation, 25 or a party’s parent, subsidiary, predecessor-in-interest, successor-in-interest, 26 related entity or affiliate; (b) an officer, shareholder, owner, manager, partner, 27 agent distributor, seller, representative, advertiser, promoter, independent 28 contractor, affiliate, director, employee, former employee or contractor, or 5 PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 relative of a direct competitor to a party to this litigation, or the competitor’s 2 parent, subsidiary, predecessor-in-interest, successor-in-interest, related entity or 3 affiliate. 4 9. Each person permitted by the parties or their counsel to have access 5 to designated information or documents under the terms of this Protective Order 6 (other than the persons identified in Paragraphs 6(a), 6(b), and 6(d) and 7(b), 7(c), 7 and 7(e)) shall, prior to being given such access, be provided with a copy of this 8 Protective Order for review. Upon receiving this Protective Order, each person 9 shall sign a statement in the form of Exhibit A hereto indicating that he or she has 10 read the Protective Order and agrees to comply with its terms. Intellectual Property  790 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 797  Pasadena, CA  91101  Grace+Grace LLP  11 10. The restrictions set forth in this Protective Order shall not apply to 12 information that is known to the receiving party or the public before the date of its 13 transmission to the receiving party, or which becomes known to the public after 14 the date of its transmission to the receiving party, provided that such information 15 does not become publicly known by any act or omission of the receiving party, its 16 employees, or its agents that would be in violation of this Protective Order. 17 11. Any document or evidence that is designated as containing 18 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” 19 information and that a party wishes to file with the Court shall be presented to the 20 Court along with a written application and proposed order for filing under seal 21 according to the procedures set forth in Local Civil Rule 79-5. Furthermore, any 22 such document or evidence so presented to the Court shall be placed in a sealed 23 envelope or other appropriate sealed container marked on the outside with the 24 title of the instant action, and a statement substantially in following form: 25 26 CONFIDENTIAL This document is subject to a Protective Order issued by the Court and may not be examined or copied except in compliance with that Order. 27 28 6 PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 12. If, at any time during the preparation for trial, any party believes that believes that it is necessary to disclose designated information to persons other 6 than those permitted by this Protective Order, and the producing party does not 7 agree to change the designation or to the further disclosure, the objecting party 8 may make an appropriate motion to the Court requesting that the specifically 9 identified documents, information and/or deposition testimony be excluded from 10 the provisions of this Protective Order or be available to specified other persons. 11 Intellectual Property  “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” or 5 790 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 797  Pasadena, CA  91101  any other party or non-party has improperly designated certain information as 4 Grace+Grace LLP  3 It shall be the burden of the party that makes the designation to demonstrate that 12 the material or information at issue was properly designated. It shall be the 13 burden of the party seeking the disclosure to persons other than those designated 14 in this Protective Order to show that such disclosure is necessary. 15 13. In the event that a party is served with a subpoena by any person, 16 firm, corporation, or other entity that is not a party to this action, is not a 17 signatory to this Protective Order or otherwise is not bound by this Protective 18 Order, that seeks to compel production of “CONFIDENTIAL” or 19 “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” information or documents, 20 the party upon whom the subpoena is served shall give written notice of the 21 subpoena to the party that has asserted that the information or documents subject 22 to the subpoena are “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S 23 EYES ONLY.” The written notice required by this paragraph shall be given no 24 later than seven days after receipt of the subpoena, or before the production date 25 set forth in the subpoena, whichever is earlier. The party who designated the 26 subject information or documents as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – 27 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” shall have the responsibility to obtain a court 28 order quashing the subpoena, a protective order, and/or such other relief as will 7 PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 protect the confidential nature of the subject information or documents before the 2 requested production date. If an order quashing the subpoena or motion for 3 protective order is obtained, the party upon whom the subpoena, discovery 4 request, or order is served shall comply with the order. If no motion to quash or 5 motion for protective order is filed before the scheduled production date set forth 6 in the subpoena, discovery request, or order, or if the motion to quash the 7 subpoena or motion for protective order is denied, the party upon whom the 8 subpoena, discovery request, or order is served may comply with the same 9 without being deemed to have violated this Protective Order. 10 Intellectual Property  790 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 797  Pasadena, CA  91101  Grace+Grace LLP  11 14. The Protective Order may be modified only in writing by the parties and approved by an order of the Court. 12 15. Upon termination of this proceeding, unless the attorneys of record 13 otherwise agree in writing, each party shall (a) assemble and return all designated 14 materials, including copies to the person(s) and entity(ies) from whom the 15 material was obtained, or (b) destroy all designated materials and provide the 16 other party with written certification that such destruction was made. The 17 attorney of record may retain one copy of any designated materials, to be kept 18 confidentially, and retain all copies of designated materials containing attorney 19 work product information. 20 16. This Protective Order shall not prejudice the right of any party or 21 nonparty to oppose production of any information on the ground of attorney- 22 client privilege, work product immunity, or any other protection provided under 23 the law. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: October 11, 2012 __________________________________ CARLA WOEHRLE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER EXHIBIT A ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF PROTECTIVE ORDER AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 1 2 3 I, ____________________________________, state that: 4 I have been asked by ____________________________ or its counsel to 5 6 7 8 9 10 receive and review certain materials or testimony that have been designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” within the terms of the Protective Order entered in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California case entitled Internet Brands, Inc. v. UltimateCoupons.com, LLC, et al., CV 11-5358 CAS (CWx). I have received a copy of the Protective Order in this action, a copy of which Intellectual Property  790 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 797  Pasadena, CA  91101  Grace+Grace LLP  11 12 13 is attached hereto. I have carefully read and understand the provisions of the Protective Order. I hereby agree to be bound by and will comply with all of the provisions of 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 the Protective Order. I will hold in confidence, will not disclose to anyone not qualified under the Protective Order, and will use only for purposes set forth in the Protective Order any information subject to the Protective Order that is disclosed to me. Upon termination of this action, I will return all confidential information which came into my possession, and all documents or things which I have prepared relating thereto, to counsel for the party by whom I am employed or retained. I hereby submit to the jurisdiction of this Court in this action solely for the 21 22 purpose of enforcement of this Protective Order. I declare the foregoing is true under penalty of perjury under the laws of the 23 24 25 State of California and the United States of America. DATED:_____________________ 26 27 ___________________________________ Signature ___________________________________ 28 9 PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?