Cavs USA Inc v. Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation
Filing
80
AMENDED ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson, re MOTION for Leave 52 . The Motion is DENIED without prejudice. (bp)
1
2
O
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CAVS USA, INC.,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT
CORPORATION d/b/a SOUND
CHOICE, a North Carolina
corporation,
16
Defendant.
17
___________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 11-05574 DDP (JEMx)
AMENDED ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
[Dkt. No. 52]
18
19
Presently before the court is Plaintiff CAVS USA, Inc.
20
(“CAVS”)’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint.
21
proposed amendments to the Complaint appear to be based at least in
22
part on Exhibit D to the Declaration of Susan B. Meyer, which has
23
been determined to be protected by attorney-client privilege.
24
(Order RE Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Determination of
25
Applicability of Privilege, February 11, 2013 (Dkt. No. 61).)
26
Plaintiffs have requested that Exhibit D be removed from the
27
court’s files.
(Request for Removal of Documents Filed . . .
28
(Dkt. No. 76).)
Because the proposed Second Amended Complaint
The
1
depends on a document that is privileged, the court finds that it
2
is inappropriate for filing.
3
prejudice.
The Motion is DENIED without
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated: March 12, 2013
DEAN D. PREGERSON
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?