Maricela Marquez et al v. Belsher Becker and Roberts Law Office

Filing 15

JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson: The Court has resolved all of the claims pending in this action. It is therefore now ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant shall have judgment in its favor on all of Maricela Marquez's and Rutilo Marquez's claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Maricela Marquez and Rutilo Marquez take nothing and that Defendant shall have its costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARICELA MARQUEZ and RUTILO MARQUEZ, 14 15 16 CV 11-6066 PA (JCx) JUDGMENT 12 13 No. Plaintiffs, v. BELSHER, BECKER & ROBERTS LAW OFFICE, Defendants. 17 In accordance with the Court’s September 19, 2011 Minute Order granting the Motion to 18 Dismiss filed by defendant Belsher, Becker & Roberts (“Defendant”) with prejudice, the Court has 19 resolved all of the claims pending in this action. 20 It is therefore now ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant shall have 21 judgment in its favor on all of Maricela Marquez’s and Rutilo Marquez’s claims. 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Maricela Marquez and 23 Rutilo Marquez take nothing and that Defendant shall have its costs of suit. 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: September 19, 2011 _________________________________ Percy Anderson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?