Alla Kazovsky v. Metrocities Mortgage LLC et al
Filing
76
AMENDED ORDER FOR JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT CITIMORTGAGE INC. by Judge Otis D Wright, II: Judgment is entered in favor of CitiMortgage and against Plaintiff on Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint; CitiMortgage is hereby dismissed from this action. CitiMortgage is entitled to costs incurred in an amount to be determined by the Court. (lc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 ALLA KAZOVSKY,
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
14 METROCITIES MORTGAGE, LLC
DBA NO RED TAPE MORTGAGE;
15 CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; U.S.
BANCORP, D/B/A U.S. BANK, N.A.,
16 AS TRUSTEE FOR CITIMORTGAGE
ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST,
17 SERIES 2006-A4; QUALITY LOAN
SERVICES, CORP.; PENNYMAC
18 LOAN SERVICES, LLC; and Does 1-
CASE NO. CV11-06079-ODW
(FMOx)
Judge: Hon. Otis D. Wright II
AMENDED ORDER FOR
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AS
TO DEFENDANT
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Action Filed: June 10, 2011
(Removed 07/22/2011)
Trial Date:
None Set
1000, inclusive,
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
On March 27, 2012, this Court granted Defendant CITIMORTGAGE, INC.’S
24 (“CitiMortgage”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff ALLA KAZOVSKY’S (“Plaintiff” or
25 “Kazovsky”) Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) in its entirety as to
26 CitiMortgage, without leave to amend, [See Doc. No. 74].
27
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:
28
1
AMENDED [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT CITIMORTGAGE,
INC.
1
Judgment is entered in favor of CitiMortgage and against Plaintiff on
2 Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint;
3
CitiMortgage is hereby dismissed from this action.
4
CitiMortgage is entitled to costs incurred in an amount to be determined by
5 the Court.
6
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9 DATED: April 5, 2012
10
11
12
HON. OTIS D. WRIGHT II
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
AMENDED [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT CITIMORTGAGE,
INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?