Alla Kazovsky v. Metrocities Mortgage LLC et al

Filing 76

AMENDED ORDER FOR JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT CITIMORTGAGE INC. by Judge Otis D Wright, II: Judgment is entered in favor of CitiMortgage and against Plaintiff on Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint; CitiMortgage is hereby dismissed from this action. CitiMortgage is entitled to costs incurred in an amount to be determined by the Court. (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLA KAZOVSKY, Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. 14 METROCITIES MORTGAGE, LLC DBA NO RED TAPE MORTGAGE; 15 CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; U.S. BANCORP, D/B/A U.S. BANK, N.A., 16 AS TRUSTEE FOR CITIMORTGAGE ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST, 17 SERIES 2006-A4; QUALITY LOAN SERVICES, CORP.; PENNYMAC 18 LOAN SERVICES, LLC; and Does 1- CASE NO. CV11-06079-ODW (FMOx) Judge: Hon. Otis D. Wright II AMENDED ORDER FOR JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT CITIMORTGAGE, INC. Action Filed: June 10, 2011 (Removed 07/22/2011) Trial Date: None Set 1000, inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 On March 27, 2012, this Court granted Defendant CITIMORTGAGE, INC.’S 24 (“CitiMortgage”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff ALLA KAZOVSKY’S (“Plaintiff” or 25 “Kazovsky”) Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) in its entirety as to 26 CitiMortgage, without leave to amend, [See Doc. No. 74]. 27 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows: 28 1 AMENDED [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT CITIMORTGAGE, INC. 1 Judgment is entered in favor of CitiMortgage and against Plaintiff on 2 Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint; 3 CitiMortgage is hereby dismissed from this action. 4 CitiMortgage is entitled to costs incurred in an amount to be determined by 5 the Court. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 DATED: April 5, 2012 10 11 12 HON. OTIS D. WRIGHT II 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 AMENDED [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT CITIMORTGAGE, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?