Terrence Buchanan v. County of Los Angeles et al
Filing
58
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, This action came on regularly for trial on January 22, 2013 in Courtroom 22, the Honorable Jay C. Gandhi, United States Magistrate Judge Presiding. Plaintiff, Terrence Buchanan appeared through his counsel Greg Garrotto; defendants County of Los Angeles, Shelor Young and Deputy Obidio Alanis appeared through their counsel, Edwin A. Lewis, Senior Deputy County Counsel. A jury of 8 persons was regularly empaneled and sworn. Witnesses were sworn and testi fied. After hearing the evidence and arguments, the jury was instructed and retired. The jury deliberated and returned its verdict, finding in favor of Defendants It appearing by reason of the Jurys verdict that plaintiff will recover nothing by reason of his complaint and that defendants are the prevailing party in the action, defendants shall recover allowable costs in the sum of $ 3,752.00, respectively. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lmh)
1 JOHN F. KRATTLI, County Counsel
ROGER H. GRANBO, Assistant County Counsel
2 EDWIN A. LEWIS, Senior Deputy County Counsel
(SBN 101699) • elewis@counsel.lacounty.gov
3 648 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration
500 West Temple Street
4 Los Angeles, California 90012-2713
Telephone: (213) 974-1202 · Fax: (213) 626-2105
5
Attorneys for Defendants
6 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, SHELOR
YOUNG and OBIDIO ALANIS
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
10
11
TERRENCE BUCHANAN,
12
13
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. CV 11-6135 VBF (JCGx)
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
v.
14
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a
15 public entity; DEPUTY SHERIFF
ALANIS, a public employee; DOES 1
16 THROUGH 10, inclusive,
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
This action came on regularly for trial on January 22, 2013 in Courtroom 22,
the Honorable Jay C. Gandhi, United States Magistrate Judge Presiding. Plaintiff,
Terrence Buchanan appeared through his counsel Greg Garrotto; defendants County
of Los Angeles, Shelor Young and Deputy Obidio Alanis appeared through their
counsel, Edwin A. Lewis, Senior Deputy County Counsel.
A jury of 8 persons was regularly empaneled and sworn. Witnesses were
sworn and testified. After hearing the evidence and arguments, the jury was
instructed and retired. The jury deliberated and returned its verdict, finding in favor
of Defendants
HOA.953452.1
1
It appearing by reason of the Jury’s verdict that plaintiff will recover nothing
2 by reason of his complaint and that defendants are the prevailing party in the action,
3 defendants shall recover allowable costs in the sum of $ 3,752.00
,
4 respectively.
5
6 DATED: February 12, 2013
_______________________________
HON. JAY C. GANDHI
Magistrate Judge, United States
District Court for the Central District of
California
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HOA.953452.1
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?