Moroccanoil Inc v. Mirage Hair Fibers et al
Filing
23
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 21 , the Court considers this case to be a proper one for a dismissal by court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action against Defendant Salon Professional Services, Inc. is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall bear their own costs and expenses incurred herein and that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement. (gk)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
10
11 MOROCCANOIL, INC., a California
corporation,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
MIRAGE HAIR FIBERS, a Canadian
15 business entity of unknown form;
SALON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES,
16 INC., a New Jersey corporation dba
Aveyou.com and AVEYOU BEAUTY
17 BOUTIQUE, and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
18
Defendants.
19
CASE No. CV-11-6316-DMG-MRWx
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE [21]
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2522.161\9991
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
1
2
3
4
5
The parties having submitted a stipulation signed by Plaintiff, Moroccanoil, Inc.,
and Defendant Salon Professional Services, Inc., by and through their undersigned
counsel, the Court considers this case to be a proper one for a dismissal by court order
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
6
7
8
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action against Defendant Salon Professional
Services, Inc. is dismissed with prejudice.
9
10
11
12
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall bear their own costs and
expenses incurred herein and that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms
of the Settlement Agreement.
13
14
Dated: June 1, 2012
15
16
17
DOLLY M. GEE
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2522.161\9991
-1-
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?