Christine Boyd v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al

Filing 43

MEMORANDUM: Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Dale S. Fischer: Defendants failed to provide grounds for the Court to maintain jurisdiction. Accordingly, this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. (Made JS-6 Case Terminated.) (Attachments: # 1 CV-103 Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court) (jp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LASC, Northeast District Case No.: GC04755 MEMORANDUM JS 6 Case No. Title CV 11-6699 DSF (FFMx) Date 12-20-11 Christine Boyd v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al. Present: The Honorable DALE S. FISCHER, United States District Judge Debra Plato Deputy Clerk Not Present Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT On August 15, 2011, this action was removed to this Court based on federal question jurisdiction. On December 19, 2011, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint that no longer contains federal claims. As Plaintiff’s federal claim was the only basis for subject matter jurisdiction, the Court now has discretion to retain or to remand the supplemental claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) (“The district courts may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a claim under subsection (a) if . . . the district court has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction . . . .”) Given that this litigation is at an early stage, the Court indicated to counsel that it was inclined to remand this matter to state court. See id. Comm. on 1988 Rev. Defendants failed to provide grounds for the Court to maintain jurisdiction. Accordingly, this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. IT IS SO ORDERED. CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?