Guru Denim Inc v. ARE Inc

Filing 86

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 85 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Gurus Complaint against ARE shall bedismissed with prejudice under FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT AREs Counterclaim against Guru shall be dismissed with prejudice under FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and FRCP 41(c).Guru and ARE agree that each party shall bear its own costs. Case Termi nated. Made JS-6. (pj)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MATTHEW P. LEWIS (State Bar No. 155516) JONATHAN A. ALON (State Bar No. 265102) WHITE & CASE LLP 633 W. Fifth Street, Suite 1900 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2007 Telephone: (213) 620-7700 Facsimile: (213) 452-2329 Email: mlewis@whitecase.com Email: jalon@whitecase.com JS-6 Attorneys for Plaintiff GURU DENIM, INC. 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 GURU DENIM, INC., a California corporation, 13 Plaintiff, Case No. CV 11-06783-GW(FMOx) ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION 14 15 16 v. ARE, INC., a Japanese corporation, Defendant. 17 18 19 ARE, INC., a Japanese corporation, Counterclaimant, 20 21 22 23 v. GURU DENIM, INC., a California corporation, Counter-Defendant 24 25 26 27 28 LOSANGELES 982836 (2K) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS 1 2 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Guru’s Complaint against ARE shall be dismissed with prejudice under FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ARE’s Counterclaim against Guru shall 4 be dismissed with prejudice under FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and FRCP 41(c). 5 Guru and ARE agree that each party shall bear its own costs. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 DATED: November 25, 2013 _____________________________ Honorable George H. Wu United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2LOSANGELES 982836 (2K) PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?