Mophie Inc v. Ronald Reeves et al

Filing 11

IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The Court, having received the plaintiffs response re OSC on January 23, 2012 10 , hereby VACATES the Order to Show Cause iss ued on January 9, 2012 9 . Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than February 22, 2012 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. (kti)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

2:11-cv-07328-SVW -SS

Title

Mophie Inc v. Ronald Reeves et al

Present: The Honorable

Date

January 25, 2012

STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Kane Tien

N/A

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter / Recorder

Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

N/A

N/A

IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD
NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
The Court, having received the plaintiff’s response re OSC on January 23, 2012 [10], hereby
VACATES the Order to Show Cause issued on January 9, 2012 [9].
Proceedings:

Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no
later than February 22, 2012 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack
of prosecution.
As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it
is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently.
•
•
•
•

Proof of service of summons and complaint (applicable for defendant(s) who have not been
served);
In cases removed from State Court, responsive pleadings filed by all defendants
Request for entry of default by plaintiff(s) (applicable where defendants have been served but
not answered);
Motion for default judgment.

:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

KTI
Page 1 of 1