United States of America v. $205,673.00 In U S Currency et al

Filing 120

CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. The Court, having considered the stipulation 118 of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, HEREBY ORDERS ADJUDGES AND DECREES: Any potential claimants to the defendant as sets other than Claimants are deemed to have admitted the allegations of the complaint with respect to the defendant assets. $51,360.51 of the defendant assets shall be returned to Claimants. The following defendant assets shall be forfeited to the United States, and no other right, title or interest shall exist therein. The Government shall dispose of the following according to law: (a) $490,724.05. Each of the parties shall bear its own fees and costs in connection with the seizure, retention and return of the defendant assets. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney LAWRENCE MIDDLETON Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division STEVEN R. WELK Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section JONATHAN GALATZAN Assistant United States Attorney Asset Forfeiture Section California Bar No. 190414 Federal Courthouse, 14th Floor 312 North Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-2727 Facsimile: (213) 894-7177 E-mail: Jonathan.Galatzan@usdoj.gov JS-6 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 WESTERN DIVISION 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) NO. CV 11-7857 BRO (PJWx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE vs. ) ) ) $205,673.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, ) ET AL., ) ) Defendant. ) ) WAJIHA SIDDIQUI, EFAZ SIDDIQUI, ) ) AQUAMARINE WHOLESALE, INC., ) GREEN HEALING, INC., MARINA ) PAPOYAN, SUREN OGANESYAN, AND ) ) SUZA, INC. ) ) Claimants. ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1 1 Plaintiff and Claimants Wajiha Siddiqui, Efaz Siddiqui, 2 Aquamarine Wholesale, Inc., Green Healing, Inc., Marina Papoyan, 3 Suren Oganesyan, and Suza, Inc. (“Claimants”) have made a 4 stipulated request for the entry of this Consent Judgment, 5 resolving this action in its entirety. 6 were seized from Claimants, and they assert an interest in the 7 defendant assets and have filed claims in this case and have 8 answered the complaint. 9 and the time for filing claims and answers has expired. 10 The defendant assets No other claims or answers were filed, The Court, having considered the stipulation of the 11 parties, and good cause appearing therefor, HEREBY ORDERS 12 ADJUDGES AND DECREES: 13 1. The government has given and published notice of this 14 action as required by law, including Rule G of the Supplemental 15 Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture 16 Actions, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules 17 of this Court. 18 contest the forfeiture of the defendant assets. 19 were filed, and the time for filing claims and answers has 20 expired. 21 judgment and the defendant assets. 22 the defendant assets other than Claimants are deemed to have 23 admitted the allegations of the complaint with respect to the 24 defendant assets. 25 26 27 28 Claimants have filed claims and answers to No other claims This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to this Any potential claimants to $51,360.51 of the defendant assets shall be returned to Claimants. The United States shall return the above-listed assets in Paragraph 2 not later than 45 days after (a) the court enters 2 1 this Consent Judgment and (b) Claimants provide to the 2 government the bank routing and personal identifiers needed to 3 effect a wire transfer of any returned funds, whichever is 4 later. 5 check, the check will be payable to “The Thomas A. Turner, Jr., 6 Esq. Client Trust,” and mailed to Claimants, in care of their 7 attorneys, Thomas A. Turner, Jr. and John T. Cavan, 11377 W. 8 Olympic Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 9 elects to make the payment by wire transfer, the funds will be If the United States elects to make the payment by 90064. If the United States 10 wire transferred to a “Thomas A. Turner, Jr., Esq. Client 11 Trust.” 12 3. The following defendant assets shall be forfeited to 13 the United States, and no other right, title or interest shall 14 exist therein. 15 according to law: a. 16 17 4. The Government shall dispose of the following $490,724.05. Claimants have agreed to release the United States of 18 America, its agencies, agents, and officers, including employees 19 and agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, from any and 20 all claims, actions or liabilities arising out of or related to 21 the seizure and retention of the defendant assets and/or the 22 commencement of this civil forfeiture action, including, without 23 limitation, any claim for attorneys’ fees, costs or interest 24 which may be asserted on behalf of Claimants against the United 25 States, whether pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465 or otherwise. 26 Claimants have waived any rights they may have to seek remission 27 or mitigation of the forfeiture. 28 3 1 5. The court finds that there was reasonable cause for the 2 seizure of the defendant assets and the institution of this 3 action as to the defendant assets pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 4 § 2465(a)(2). 5 reasonable cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465(a)(2) as to the 6 defendant assets. 7 6. This judgment constitutes a certificate of Each of the parties shall bear its own fees and costs 8 in connection with the seizure, retention and return of the 9 defendant assets. 10 11 DATED: March 9, 2017 12 13 ________________________________________ THE HONORABLE BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 Prepared by: 17 18 19 20 21 EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division STEVEN R. WELK Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section 22 23 /s/ Jonathan Galatzan JONATHAN GALATZAN 24 25 Assistant United States Attorney Asset Forfeiture Section 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?