Paul van der Maas v. Nvidia Corporation et al

Filing 37

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Otis D Wright, II. Having considered Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) 36 , it is hereby ordered that this case is dismissed with prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (cch)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 JS-6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PAUL VAN DER MAAS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) NVIDIA CORPORATION, a ) Delaware Corporation; ASUS ) COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, ) ) a California Corporation; ASUSTEK COMPUTER, INC., a ) Taiwanese Corporation; and DOES ) ) 1 through 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 11-CV-8014 ODW (FMOx) CLASS ACTION ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE Assigned to the Hon. Otis D. Wright, II, Ctrm. 11 Magistrate Judge: Hon. Fernando M. Olguin Action Filed on September 27, 2011 26 27 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE 1 Plaintiff Paul Van der Maas has filed a Notice of Dismissal of this action 2 with prejudice (“Notice”). Having considered the Notice, it is hereby ORDERED 3 that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4 5 6 March 19, 2012 Hon. Otis D. Wright, II United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?