Courthouse News Service v. Michael Planet

Filing 199

JUDGMENT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFCOURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE AND AGAINST DEFENDANT MICHAEL PLANET AND AWARD COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES (SEE DOCUMENT FOR OTHER SPECIFICS) by Judge S. James Otero. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

Download PDF
BRYAN CAVE LLP 560 MISSION STREET, 25TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2994 1 Rachel Matteo-Boehm (SBN 195492) 2 rachel.matteo-boehm@bryancave.com Roger Myers (SBN 1461640) 3 roger.myers@bryancave.com 4 Jonathan G. Fetterly (SBN 228612) jon.fetterly@bryancave.com 5 Leila C. Knox (SBN 245999) 6 leila.knox@bryancave.com BRYAN CAVE LLP 7 560 Mission Street, Suite 2500 8 San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 Telephone: (415) 675-3400 9 Facsimile: (415) 675-3434 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff 11 COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE JS-6 June 14, 2016 VC P June 14, 2016 VC P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 12 13 14 15 Courthouse News Service, 16 Plaintiff, 17 vs. 18 Michael Planet, in his official capacity 19 as Court Executive Officer/Clerk of the Ventura County Superior Court, 20 Defendant. 21 Case No. CV11-08083 SJO (FFMx) JUDGMENT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE AND AGAINST DEFENDANT MICHAEL PLANET 22 23 This action came before the Court on the Amended Complaint of Plaintiff 24 25 Courthouse News Service (“CNS”) for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief under 42 26 U.S.C. § 1983 and the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution 27 against Defendant Michael Planet, in his official capacity as Court Executive Officer 28 and Clerk of the Superior Court in and for the County of Ventura, California. 1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF CNS 280189.1 Case No. CV11-08083 SJO (FFMx) 1 The Court having entered an Order on May 26, 2016, Granting in Part and 2 Denying in Part CNS’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and Denying Defendant’s 3 Motion for Summary Judgment, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 4 DECREED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, Judgment be 5 entered in this action for Plaintiff CNS and against Defendant Planet as follows: 1. On CNS’s Prayer for Declaratory Relief, it is ORDERED, 6 7 ADJUDGED and DECREED that: a. 8 9 BRYAN CAVE LLP 560 MISSION STREET, 25TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2994 10 11 12 There is a qualified First Amendment right of timely access to newly filed civil complaints, including their associated exhibits. b. This qualified right of timely access attaches when new complaints are received by a court, rather than after they are “processed” -- i.e., rather than after the performance of administrative tasks that follow the court’s receipt of a new complaint. 13 c. This qualified right of timely access attaches on receipt 14 regardless of whether courts use paper filing or e-filing systems. 15 d. Planet’s policy prior to June 18, 2014 of requiring that newly 16 filed complaints and their associated exhibits be “processed” prior to providing the 17 press and public with access to those complaints violates CNS’s qualified First 18 Amendment right of timely access to newly filed complaints and their associated 19 exhibits because, for the reasons stated in this Court’s May 26 Order, Planet has not 20 met his burden of proving that this policy is essential to preserve higher values and 21 narrowly tailored to serve that interest, as required to overcome CNS’s qualified 22 First Amendment right of access, or that this policy constitutes a reasonable time, 23 place and manner restriction. e. Planet’s June 18, 2014 scanning policy also violates CNS’s 24 25 qualified First Amendment right of timely access to newly filed complaints and their associated exhibits because, for the reasons stated in this Court’s May 26 Order, 26 Planet has not met his burden of proving that this policy is essential to preserve 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF CNS 280189.1 Case No. CV11-08083 SJO (FFMx) 1 higher values and narrowly tailored to serve that interest, or that this policy 2 constitutes a reasonable time, place and manner restriction. 2. 3 On CNS’s Prayer for Injunctive Relief, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED BRYAN CAVE LLP 560 MISSION STREET, 25TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2994 4 and DECREED that Planet is hereby permanently enjoined from refusing to make 5 newly filed unlimited civil complaints and their associated exhibits available to the 6 public and press until after such complaints and associated exhibits are “processed,” regardless of whether such complaints are filed in paper form or e-filed, and is 7 further directed to make such complaints and exhibits accessible to the public and 8 press in a timely manner from the moment they are received by the court, regardless 9 of whether such complaints are scanned, e-filed, or made available in any other 10 format, except in those instances where the filing party has properly moved to place 11 the complaint under seal. 12 3. On CNS’s Prayer for Costs and Attorneys’ Fees, it is ORDERED, 13 ADJUDGED and DECREED that CNS is the prevailing party in this action. 14 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), CNS is awarded its costs in an 15 amount to be determined pursuant to the procedures specified in Local Rules 54-1 et 16 seq. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, CNS is further awarded its costs and attorneys’ 17 fees in an amount to be determined on noticed motion pursuant to Federal Rule of 18 Civil Procedure 54(d)(2) and Local Rules 54-10 and 54-11, which shall be filed 19 within 60 days of the date of entry of this judgment. 20 21 22 23 Dated: 6/14/16 _____________________________ S. James Otero Judge of the U.S. District Court Central District of California 24 25 26 27 28 3 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF CNS 280189.1 Case No. CV11-08083 SJO (FFMx)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?