Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Christopher R Morales Inc

Filing 9

JUDGMENT by Judge Gary A. Feess, in favor of Contract Compliance Fund, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, National Electrical Industry Fund, Trustees of the Inland Empire IBEW-NECA Health Trust, Trustees of the Inland Empire Labor-Managemen t Cooperation Committee Fund, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the Riverside County Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the R iverside County Electrical Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Trustees of the San Bernardino County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW- NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan against Christopher R Morales Inc. The principal amount of $122,157.88 plus pre-judgment interest and post judgment interest thereon at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from February 1, 2012, until paid in full (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA PENSION PLAN, TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA HEALTH TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ELECTRICAL HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE INLAND EMPIRE IBEW-NECA HEALTH TRUST, TRUSTEES OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY ELECTRICAL EDUCATIONAL AND TRAINING TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY EDUCATION AND TRAINING TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ELECTRICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA LABORMANAGEMENT COOPERATION COMMITTEE, TRUSTEES OF THE INLAND EMPIRE LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION COMMITTEE, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND, CONTRACT COMPLIANCE FUND, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY FUND, AND THE LOS ANGELES ELECTRICAL WORKERS CREDIT UNION, 26 27 Assigned to the Honorable Gary A. Fees JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, 24 25 Case No.: CV11-8962 GAF(FMOx) vs. CHRISTOPHER R. MORALES, INC., a California corporation, Defendant. 28 1 MORALES_PROPOSED JUDGMENT.DOC Judgment 1 This action having been commenced on October 28, 2011, and the Court having 2 approved the stipulation for entry of judgment in favor of plaintiffs Trustees of the 3 Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, et al., and against defendant 4 Christopher R. Morales, Inc., and for good cause shown, 5 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 7 Plaintiffs Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, 8 Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the 9 Riverside County Electrical Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Trustees of the Inland 10 Empire IBEW-NECA Health Trust, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical 11 Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the Riverside County Education and 12 Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the San Bernardino County Electrical Education and 13 Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Labor- 14 Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the Inland Empire Labor- 15 Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit 16 Fund, Contract Compliance Fund, National Electrical Industry Fund and the Los 17 Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, shall recover from defendant Christopher R. 18 Morales, Inc., the principal amount of $122,157.88, plus pre-judgment interest and 19 post judgment interest thereon at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from 20 February 1, 2012, until paid in full. 21 22 23 Dated: February 15, 2012 24 _____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 2 MORALES_PROPOSED JUDGMENT.DOC Judgment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?