Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Christopher R Morales Inc
Filing
9
JUDGMENT by Judge Gary A. Feess, in favor of Contract Compliance Fund, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, National Electrical Industry Fund, Trustees of the Inland Empire IBEW-NECA Health Trust, Trustees of the Inland Empire Labor-Managemen t Cooperation Committee Fund, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the Riverside County Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the R iverside County Electrical Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Trustees of the San Bernardino County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW- NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan against Christopher R Morales Inc. The principal amount of $122,157.88 plus pre-judgment interest and post judgment interest thereon at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from February 1, 2012, until paid in full (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA PENSION PLAN,
TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA HEALTH TRUST
FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY ELECTRICAL HEALTH &
WELFARE TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES OF
THE INLAND EMPIRE IBEW-NECA
HEALTH TRUST, TRUSTEES OF THE LOS
ANGELES COUNTY ELECTRICAL
EDUCATIONAL AND TRAINING TRUST
FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY EDUCATION AND TRAINING
TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY ELECTRICAL
EDUCATION AND TRAINING TRUST
FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA LABORMANAGEMENT COOPERATION
COMMITTEE, TRUSTEES OF THE INLAND
EMPIRE LABOR-MANAGEMENT
COOPERATION COMMITTEE, TRUSTEES
OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT
FUND, CONTRACT COMPLIANCE FUND,
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY
FUND, AND THE LOS ANGELES
ELECTRICAL WORKERS CREDIT UNION,
26
27
Assigned to the Honorable
Gary A. Fees
JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs,
24
25
Case No.: CV11-8962 GAF(FMOx)
vs.
CHRISTOPHER R. MORALES, INC., a
California corporation,
Defendant.
28
1
MORALES_PROPOSED JUDGMENT.DOC
Judgment
1
This action having been commenced on October 28, 2011, and the Court having
2
approved the stipulation for entry of judgment in favor of plaintiffs Trustees of the
3
Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, et al., and against defendant
4
Christopher R. Morales, Inc., and for good cause shown,
5
6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
7
Plaintiffs Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan,
8
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the
9
Riverside County Electrical Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Trustees of the Inland
10
Empire IBEW-NECA Health Trust, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical
11
Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the Riverside County Education and
12
Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the San Bernardino County Electrical Education and
13
Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Labor-
14
Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the Inland Empire Labor-
15
Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit
16
Fund, Contract Compliance Fund, National Electrical Industry Fund and the Los
17
Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, shall recover from defendant Christopher R.
18
Morales, Inc., the principal amount of $122,157.88, plus pre-judgment interest and
19
post judgment interest thereon at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from
20
February 1, 2012, until paid in full.
21
22
23
Dated: February 15, 2012
24
_____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
2
MORALES_PROPOSED JUDGMENT.DOC
Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?