Paulina D Burton v. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection et al

Filing 19

PROTECTIVE ORDER RE INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CIPA by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, Pursuant to the parties Stipulation for Protective Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Only counsel for the parties may use the information pertaining to the h ome addresses and telephone numbers of former and current employees of defendant for the purposes of serving subpoenas for depositions or trial. The information pertaining to the home addresses and telephone numbers of former and current employees of defendant shall not be disclosed or used by plaintiff. re Stipulation for Protective Order 18 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (lmh)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA--WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 Case No. CV11-9328 PSG (JCGx) PAULINA D. BURTON, v. Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER RE INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CIPA 15 16 17 ECC/OES FIRE DEPARTMENT A/K/A “CAL-FIRE” AN AGENCY OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND DOES 1 Through 50, Inclusive, Courtroom: 880 Judge: The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez Defendants. Trial Date: January 15, 2013 Action Filed: June 9, 2011 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation for Protective Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Only counsel for the parties may use the information pertaining to the home addresses and telephone numbers of former and current employees of defendant for the purposes of serving subpoenas for depositions or trial. The information pertaining to the home addresses and telephone numbers of former and current employees of defendant shall not be disclosed or used by plaintiff. 28 1 Protective Order CV11-9328 PSG (JCGx) 1 (2) The parties, through their counsel, may use the information produced by 2 defendant in all law and motion proceedings, however, the parties agree that any 3 information subject to this Protective Order shall be designated as “Confidential” 4 and filed under seal pursuant to L.R. 79, and shall not be disclosed to plaintiff. 5 (3) If counsel for either party wishes to disclose information protected by the 6 California Information Practices Act to persons requested to furnish litigation 7 services, other than their counsel, then said person(s) shall execute a written 8 declaration substantially in the form of Exhibit “A” hereto. The information shall 9 not be disclosed to plaintiff. 10 (4) Upon completion of this action, plaintiff’s counsel shall certify to the 11 Court that they have irretrievably destroyed or returned all documents containing 12 information that have been produced pursuant to this Stipulation for Protective 13 Order and Protective Order. Plaintiff’s counsel shall further certify that they have 14 destroyed or returned all copies and/or duplicates, as defined by Rule 1001(4) of the 15 Federal Rules of Evidence, that they have made of such documents. 16 (5) This Order is not intended to compromise the rights of any party to object 17 to discovery pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or any other 18 governing authority nor is it intended to alter any burden of proof regarding any 19 assertion of privilege in this matter. 20 21 22 DATED: September 06, 2012 _______________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Protective Order CV11-9328 PSG (JCGx) EXHIBIT “A” 1 2 I have read and I understand the Stipulation for Protective Order and 3 Protective Order entered by the Court in the case Paulina D. Burton v. ECC/OES 4 Fire Department a/k/a “Cal-Fire”, an Agency of the State of California, CV11-9328 5 PSG (JCGx), and I agree to be bound by its terms. 6 DATED:______________ __________________________________ Signature 7 8 9 __________________________________ Printed Name 10 11 12 13 LA2011505158 60844861.doc 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Protective Order CV11-9328 PSG (JCGx)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?