Eliseo Alvarez v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc et al

Filing 30

ORDER TO REMAND by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: Upon consideration of the parties stipulation, it is hereby ordered that this action is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees incurred in connection with the removal of this action and other proceedings in this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (Attachments: # 1 Letter CV-103) (ad)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION WESTERN DIVISION 411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053 Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516 (714) 338-4750 312 North Spring Street, Room G-8 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Tel: (213) 894-3535 EASTERN DIVISION TERRY NAFISI 3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134 Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 328-4450 February 10, 2012 District Court Executive and Clerk of Court Los Angeles County Superior Court 111 North Hill Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attn: Civil Dept. Re: Case Number: CV11-9502 VAP(OPx) Previously Superior Court Case No. BC471310 Case Name: Eliseo Alvarez v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc et al Dear Sir / Madam: Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on 2/9/2012 above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction. , the Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this Court. Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to our office. Thank you for your cooperation. Respectfully, Clerk, U. S. District Court By: Angelique Dominguez Deputy Clerk 951-328-4453 G Western G Eastern $ G Southern Division cc: Counsel of record Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein. Clerk, Superior Court Date CV - 103 (09/08) By: Deputy Clerk LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?