Edward Michael Razo v. M D Biter
Filing
35
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Judge R. Gary Klausner: Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted; 2. Jud gment by entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and 3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties. Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. (sl)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
EDWARD MICHAEL RAZO,
13
Petitioner,
14
15
v.
MARTIN D. BITER, Warden,
Case No. CV 11-9513-RGK (LAL)
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
16
Respondent.
17
18
19
20
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge’s
21
Report and Recommendation, Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and
22
the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.
23
24
Petitioner’s Objections generally lack merit for the reasons set forth in the Report and
Recommendation.
25
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
26
1.
The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;
27
2.
Judgment by entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with
28
prejudice; and
-1-
1
3.
2
Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds
3
that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 1 Thus,
4
the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.
The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.
5
6
7
DATED: June 03, 2015
8
________________________________
HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 154 L. Ed.
2d 931 (2003).
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?