Leopold XIII SPRL v. Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation et al

Filing 20

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION and LIONS GATE FILMS, INC. WITH PREJUDICE by Judge S. James Otero. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED as follows: This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each of the parties bearing its own costs, expenses and attorneys fees incurred in connection with the action, the resolution of this action, and this dismissal.Case Terminated. Made JS-6., (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (cch)

1 M. Taylor Florence (SBN 159695)
[e-mail]
2 LOCKE LORD LLP
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1800
3 Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEOPOLD XIII SPRL
6

JS-6

7 David Aronoff (SBN 125694)
[e-mail]
8 LATHROP & GAGE LLP
1888 Century Park East, Suite 1000
9 Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: [phone]
10 Facsimile: [phone]
11 Attorneys for Defendants
LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT
12 CORPORATION and LIONS GATE
FILMS, INC.
13
14
15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION

17
18
19 LEOPOLD XIII SPRL,
Plaintiffs,
20
21

Case No. CV11-9620 SJO (FFMx)

v.

22 LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT
CORPORATION AND LIONS GATE
23 FILMS, INC., and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive.
24
Defendants.

ORDER DISMISSING
DEFENDANTS LIONS GATE
ENTERTAINMENT
CORPORATION and LIONS
GATE FILMS, INC. WITH
PREJUDICE
Honorable S. James Otero

25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSING DEFENDANTS

1

Pursuant to the stipulation pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

2 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), entered into by plaintiff Leopold XIII SPRL, on the one hand, and
3 defendants Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation and Lions Gate Films, Inc., on the
4 other hand, for the dismissal with prejudice of this action in its entirety, with said
5 parties to each bear their own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees, and good cause
6 appearing, therefor,
7

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED as follows:

8

This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each of the parties bearing

9 its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with the action, the
10 resolution of this action, and this dismissal.
11
12 IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14 DATED:

___________________________
Hon. S. James Otero
U.S. District Court Judge

May 23, 2012.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSING DEFENDANTS