Anahit Torosyan v. Bank of America National Association et al

Filing 22

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge George H Wu, 18]. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety as to all Defendants. The CourtORDERS that such judgment be entered. (pj)

1 STEVEN A. ELLIS (SBN 171742)
[e-mail]
2 SHANNA M. RAMSOWER (SBN 272430)
[e-mail]
3 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
601 S Figueroa St., 41st Floor
4 Los Angeles, California 90017
Tel.: [phone]
5 Fax: [phone]
6 ALISON M. NORRIS (SBN 248711)
[e-mail]
7 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
4365 Executive Drive, 3rd Floor
8 San Diego, CA 92121
Tel. [phone]
9 Fax [phone]
10 Attorneys for Defendants:
Bank of America, National Association;
11 Mortgage Electronic Registration
Systems, Inc. (erroneously sued as
12 Mortgage Electronic Registration
Systems); ReconTrust Company,
13 National Association, and Countrywide
Home Loans, Inc. (erroneously sued as
14 Countrywide Home Loans)
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

WESTERN DIVISION

18 ANAHIT TOROSYAN, an individual,
19
Plaintiff,

Case No. CV 11-9629-GW(Ex)

20

Courtroom: 10 (Spring)
Judge:
Hon. George H Wu
312 N. Spring Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012

v.

21 BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, a corporation;
22 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., a
23 corporation; TINA SEVILLANO, an
individual; RECONTRUST
24 COMPANY, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, a corporation;
25 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, a
corporation; and DOES 1 though 50,
26 inclusive,
Defendants.

27
28

LIBW/1817924.1

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

1

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

2

On February 9, 2012, this Court entered an Order granting the Motion to

3 Dismiss of Defendants Bank of America, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration
4 Systems, Inc., ReconTrust Company, N.A., and Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. in
5 its entirety. The Court allowed Plaintiff Anahit Torosyan (“Plaintiff”) leave to
6 amend her cause of action for a violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures
7 Act, 12 U.S.C. § 2605. Plaintiff has had more than thirty (30) days in which to
8 submit a First Amended Complaint, but she has not done so. Therefore, pursuant to
9 the Court’s Order of Dismissal:
10

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s Complaint is

11 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety as to all Defendants. The Court
12 ORDERS that such judgment be entered.
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15 Dated: April 3, 2012

HON. GEORGE H. WU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

LIBW/1817924.1

1

1

PROOF OF SERVICE

2

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18
and not a party to the within action. My business address is 601 S Figueroa St., 41st Floor, Los
3 Angeles, CA 90017.

4

On April 4, 2012, I served the following documents by placing a true copy thereof in a
sealed envelope(s) on the persons below as follows:

5 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
6 Armen Janian
Counsel for Plaintiff: Anahit Torosyan
LAW OFFICES OF ARMEN JANIAN AND
Tel. [phone]
7 ASSOCIATES
Fax. [phone]
620 North Brand Blvd., Suite 550

[e-mail]

8 Glendale, CA 91202
9
10



(MAIL) I placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary
business practices. I am readily familiar with this firm’s practice for collecting and
processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed
for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the
United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. I am a
resident or employed in the county where the mailing occurred. The envelope or
package was placed in the mail at Los Angeles, California.



(OVERNIGHT DELIVERY) I deposited in a box or other facility regularly maintained
by Federal Express , an express service carrier, or delivered to a courier or driver
authorized by said express service carrier to receive documents, a true copy of the
foregoing document in sealed envelopes or packages designated by the express service
carrier, addressed as stated above, with fees for overnight delivery paid or provided for.



(E-MAIL or ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION) Based on a court order or an agreement
of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the
documents to be sent to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed. I did not receive,
within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other
indication that the transmission was unsuccessful.



(CM/ECF Electronic Filing) I caused the above document(s) to be transmitted to the
office(s) of the addressee(s) listed above by electronic mail at the e-mail address(es) set
forth above pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.5(d)(1). “A Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is
generated automatically by the ECF system upon completion of an electronic filing. The
NEF, when e-mailed to the e-mail address of record in the case, shall constitute the proof
of service as required by Fed.R.Civ.P.5(d)(1). A copy of the NEF shall be attached to
any document served in the traditional manner upon any party appearing pro se.”

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar

24 of this Court at whose direction this service was made and that the foregoing is true and correct.
25
Executed on April 4, 2012, at Los Angeles, California.
26
27

Arianne Waldron
(Type or print name)

28

LIBW/1817924.1

(Signature)

1