United States of America v. Real Property on Butterfly Bush Court et al

Filing 9

CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE by Judge Gary A. Feess. All right, title and interest in the defendant real property is hereby condemned and forfeited to the United States of America. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (bp)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney ROBERT E. DUGDALE Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division STEVEN R. WELK California Bar No. 149883 Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section Federal Courthouse, 14th Floor 312 North Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-6166 Facsimile: (213) 894-7177 E-mail: Steven.Welk@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 WESTERN DIVISION 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) REAL PROPERTY ON BUTTERFLY ) BUSH COURT, CORONA, ) CALIFORNIA, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) WISAENG JEON; HAPPY SMILE ) PROPERTIES, INC. ) ) Titleholders. ) ____________________________) NO. CV 11-10002 GAF (Ex) CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE 24 25 On December 2, 2011, plaintiff United States of America 26 (“plaintiff” or the “government”) initiated this civil forfeiture 27 action alleging that the defendant real property located on 28 1 Butterfly Bush Court in Corona, California (the “defendant real 2 property”) was subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981 3 (a)(1)(A) and (C). 4 in accordance with law. 5 real property is: Notice of the action was given and published The legal description of the defendant 6 Lot 27 of Tract 31025, in the County of Riverside, 7 State of California, as shown by map on file in Book 8 374, Pages 30 through 35, inclusive, in the Office of 9 the County Recorder of Riverside County, California. 10 The defendant real property is titled in the names of Wisaeng 11 JEON (“JEON”) and Happy Smile Properties, Inc. (“HSP”), who hold 12 the property as tenants in common. 13 recorded against the property except for a tax lien in favor of 14 the County of Riverside, which the government did not contest. 15 There are no known liens The government and the owners of the property (JEON and HSP) 16 (collectively, the “parties”) have reached an agreement that is 17 dispositive of this action. 18 parties request that the Court enter this consent judgment of 19 forfeiture. 20 21 By their signatures hereunder, the The Court, having been duly advised of and having considered the matter, and based upon the mutual consent of the parties, 22 HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES, AND DECREES: 23 1. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant 24 to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345 and 1355, and over the parties who have 25 submitted to the jurisdiction of this Court by agreeing to the 26 entry of this consent judgment. 27 28 2 2. 1 2 The Complaint for Forfeiture states a claim for relief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(A) and (C). 3. 3 Notice of this action has been given as required by 4 law. 5 filing claims and answers has expired. 6 authorized representative whose signature appears below) are the 7 sole titleholders to the defendant real property. The Court deems 8 that all other potential claimants admit the allegations of the 9 Complaint for Forfeiture to be true. 10 No claims or answers have been filed and the time for 4. JEON and HSP (through its All right, title and interest in the defendant real 11 property is hereby condemned and forfeited to the United States 12 of America. 13 judgment in the grantor index under the names of Wisaeng JEON and 14 Happy Smile Properties, Inc., and in the grantee index under the 15 name of the United States of America. 16 5. The Riverside County Recorder shall index this Following entry of this judgment, the government shall 17 dispose of the defendant real property according to law, and 18 shall satisfy any liens secured by the defendant real property. 19 The net proceeds of any such sale shall be disposed of according 20 to law. 21 6. The parties shall execute further documents to the 22 extent necessary, to convey clear title of the defendant real 23 property to the United States and to further implement the terms 24 of this Consent Judgment. 25 7. By their signatures hereunder, JEON and HSP have 26 released the United States of America, its agencies, officers, 27 and employees, from any and all claims, actions, or liabilities 28 3 1 arising out of or related to this action, including, without 2 limitation, any claim for attorneys’ fees, costs, or interest, 3 whether pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465 or otherwise. 4 8. The Court finds that there was reasonable cause for the 5 institution of these proceedings. 6 construed as a certificate of reasonable cause pursuant to 28 7 U.S.C. § 2465. 8 9 10 9. This judgment shall be The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of enforcing this consent judgment. DATED: March 2, 2012 11 ______________________________ THE HONORABLE GARY A. FEESS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 [Signatures of the parties appear on the following page.] 15 / / / 16 / / / 17 / / / 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 CONSENT 1 2 The parties request that this judgment be entered and waive 3 any right of appeal. JEON and HSP hereby acknowledge that (a) 4 they have read and understand this consent judgment, or that it 5 has been read and explained to them to their satisfaction, and 6 (b) they have had an opportunity to confer with legal counsel 7 with respect to this consent judgment, and enter into this 8 consent judgment freely and voluntarily. 9 DATED: February 28, 2012 10 11 12 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney ROBERT E. DUGDALE Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division /s/ STEVEN R. WELK Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section 13 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 15 16 DATED: February 23, 2012 17 /s/ Wisaeng JEON 18 19 DATED: February 23, 2012 20 /s/ 21 22 Jeong Mi Park Happy Smile Properties, Inc. 23 24 25 26 27 28 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?