Damon Terrell v. California Commerce Club Inc et al
Filing
20
ORDER APPROVING Stipulation to Dismiss Case 18 by Judge A. Howard Matz, and good cause showing, hereby orders the following: Plaintiff's individual claims against Defendants shall be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs. (jp)
COASTAL PACIFIC LEGAL GROUP
MARK A. GOLOVACH (SBN 220760)
2 markg@coastalpacificlegal.com
501 W. Broadway, Suite 800
3
San Diego, California 92101
4 Telephone: 619/400-4895 – Facsimile: 619/684-3601
1
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6 Damon Terrell
7
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
8 REBEKAH KAUFMAN (BAR NO. 213222)
RKaufman@mofo.com
9
425 Market Street
10 San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: 415/268-7000 / Facsimile: 415/268-7522
11
12 Attorneys for Defendants
13
California Commerce Club, Inc.
and Commerce Casino
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
WESTERN DIVISION
18
19 DAMON TERRELL, Individually and
20
on Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated,
21
Plaintiff,
22
23
vs.
24
CALIFORNIA COMMERCE CLUB,
25 INC., COMMERCE CASINO, and
DOES 1-10, inclusive,
26
27
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:11-cv-10285-AHM(MANx)
ORDER APPROVING
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE
28
ORDER
1
The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation to Dismiss Case, by plaintiff
2 DAMON TERRELL (“Plaintiff”) and defendants CALIFORNIA COMMERCE
3 CLUB, INC. (“Commerce Club”) and COMMERCE CASINO (“Commerce
4 Casino”) (collectively, “Defendants”), filed July 17, 2012, and good cause
5 showing, hereby orders the following:
6
Plaintiff’s individual claims against Defendants shall be dismissed with
7 prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs.
8
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10 DATED: August 27, 2012
11
12
13
14
____________________________
Honorable A. Howard Matz
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?