Edge Systems Corporation v. Bio-Therapeutic Inc et al

Filing 24

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge John F. Walter, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 23 . Each of the parties SHALL BEAR ITS OWN COSTS AND ITS OWN ATTORNEYS' FEES. All claims and any counterclaims filed in this action SHALL BE DISMISSED from this action WITH PREJUDICE. Having addressed each of the claims and any counterclaims in this action, this case SHALL BE CLOSED. (kbr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Brenton R. Babcock (SBN 162,120) bbabcock@kmob.com Rustin K. Mangum (SBN 280,109) rustin.mangum@kmob.com KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP 2040 Main Street Fourteenth Floor Irvine, CA 92614 Phone: (949) 760-0404 Facsimile: (949) 760-9502 Attorneys for Plaintiff EDGE SYSTEMS CORPORATION Audra Mori (SBN 162,850) AMori@perkinscoie.com Michael J. Song (SBN 243,675) MSong@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 1888 Century Park East, Suite 1700 Los Angeles, CA 90067-1721 Telephone: (310) 788.9900 Facsimile: (310) 788.3399 Closed Attorneys for Defendant MICRO CURRENT TECHNOLOGY, INC., d/b/a BIO-THERAPEUTIC, INC. 15 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 WESTERN DIVISION 19 20 21 22 EDGE SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. 24 BIO-THERAPEUTIC, INC., a Washington corporation, and MICRO CURRENT TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Washington corporation, 25 Defendants. 23 26 27 28 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 11-CV-10383 JFW (AGR) ORDER: STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Hon. John F. Walter 1 STIPULATED DISMISSAL ORDER 2 This case having come before this Court, and it being represented to the 3 Court that Plaintiff Edge Systems Corporation (“Edge”) and Defendant Micro 4 Current Technology, Inc., d/b/a Bio-Therapeutic, Inc. (“BT”) have compromised 5 and 6 ADJUDICATED, and DECREED as follows: settled 7 in dispute, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, Having considered the STIPULATION of the parties, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 10 11 matters STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 8 9 the 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter in this case. 12 2. Venue is proper in this judicial district. 13 3. Each of the parties SHALL BEAR ITS OWN COSTS AND ITS 14 OWN ATTORNEYS' FEES. 15 16 4. DISMISSED from this action WITH PREJUDICE. 17 18 All claims and any counterclaims filed in this action SHALL BE 5. Having addressed each of the claims and any counterclaims in this action, this case SHALL BE CLOSED. 19 20 Dated: November 28, 2012 Hon. John F. Walter U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 14410304 25 112712 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?