United States of America v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al

Filing 20

AMENDED CONSENT ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez (see document for further details). Related to: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Reopen Case to Extend Consent Order 18 . (bm)

Download PDF
LORETTA E. LYNCH 1 Attorney General VANITA GUPTA 2 Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division 3 STEVEN H. ROSENBAUM Chief 4 JON M. SEWARD Deputy Chief 5 PATRICIA L. O’BEIRNE E-mail: Patricia.O’Beirne@usdoj.gov 6 BURTIS M. DOUGHERTY E-mail: Burtis.M.Dougherty@usdoj.gov 7 Trial Attorneys Housing and Civil Enforcement Section 8 Civil Rights Division U.S. Department of Justice 9 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. - G Street Washington, DC 20530 10 Tel: (202) 514-4713 Fax: (202) 514-1116 11 EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney 12 LEON W. WEIDMAN Chief, Civil Division 13 SEKRET SNEED Assistant United States Attorney 14 Calif. Bar No. 217193 E-mail: Sekret.Sneed@usdoj.gov 15 Federal Building, Suite 7516 300 North Los Angeles Street 16 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Tel: (213) 894-3551 17 Fax: (213) 894-7819 Attorneys for Plaintiff 18 United States of America E-FILED- 1/25/16 LINK#18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 21 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 22 Plaintiff, 23 v. 24 COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL 25 CORPORATION; and COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC; 26 27 28 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 2:11-cv-10540-PSG-AJW [PROPOSED] AMENDED CONSENT ORDER ________________________________________ Pursuant to Paragraph 19 of the 2011 Consent Order entered in this action on 1 2 December 28, 2011, and the joint request of the parties, the 2011 Consent Order is 3 hereby amended as follows: 4 5 1. 6 extended by one (1) year, to December 30, 2016. 7 2. The provisions of Paragraphs 12 through 17, 20, 21, 26, and 27 are Defendants have satisfied the requirements of the remaining provisions of 8 the 2011 Consent Order, and those provisions shall expire as originally scheduled 9 10 on December 28, 2015. 11 3. As of December 15, 2015, over $305 million has been distributed to 12 13 aggrieved persons from the Settlement Fund. Within sixty (60) days of the entry 14 of this Amended Order, Defendants shall present a proposal to this Court for the 15 distribution of $15,000,000.00 (fifteen million dollars) to one or more 16 17 organizations in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 15 of the 2011 18 Consent Order. The parties agree that this distribution will leave sufficient funds 1 19 to compensate all remaining identified aggrieved persons who are participating in 20 this settlement. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Paragraph 15 provides that any funds remaining that were designated for Illinois borrowers pursuant to Paragraph 9 of the 2011 Consent Order should be distributed to qualified organization(s) located in Illinois. However, the parties agree that all funds designated for Illinois borrowers will have been distributed as part of the payment of the claims of individual qualified aggrieved persons. Accordingly, there is no specific amount of remaining funds that must be made to qualified organization(s) located in Illinois. 28 -2- 1 4. 2 Court for the distribution of all money remaining in the Settlement Fund. That 3 No later than October 14, 2016, Defendants shall present a proposal to this distribution will follow the completion of the payment of all claims to identified 4 5 aggrieved persons, in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 15 of the 2011 6 Consent Order. 7 5. For each recipient of funds provided pursuant to Paragraph 15 of the 2011 8 9 10 11 Consent Order, the Defendants must obtain that recipient’s agreement to use the funds consistent with the terms of the 2011 Consent Order. The Defendants must reserve rights of recourse against any such recipient which may be exercised if 12 13 the Defendants determine that the funds have not been utilized consistent with the 14 Order. 15 16 6. As provided in Paragraph 15 of the 2011 Consent Order, Defendants shall 17 require each recipient of funds to submit to Defendants and the United States a 18 detailed report explaining how it utilized the funds. Each recipient of funds must 19 20 deliver its respective report(s) to the Defendants and the United States no later 21 than one year after the date on which it receives any such funds. The parties 22 recognize that such reports may be delivered after the expiration of the Amended 23 24 Consent Order. 25 26 27 28 -3- 1 2 3 So ORDERED, this _____ day of _____________________, 20___. January 25 16 4 PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ 5 __________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 The undersigned apply for and consent to the entry of this Order. 9 For Plaintiff United States: 10 EILEEN M. DECKER 11 United States Attorney VANITA GUPTA Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General 12 _/s/Leon Weidman____________ 13 LEON WEIDMAN Chief, Civil Division 14 STEVEN H. ROSENBAUM Chief 15 JON M. SEWARD Deputy Chief 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SEKRET SNEED_ Assistant United States Attorney Calif. Bar No. 217193 Federal Building, Suite 7516 300 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Email: Sekret.Sneed@usdoj.gov Phone: (213) 894-3551 Fax: (213) 894-7819 __/s/Patricia L. O’Beirne______ BURTIS M. DOUGHERTY PATRICIA L. O’BEIRNE Trial Attorneys Housing and Civil Enforcement Section Civil Rights Division United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW – NWB Washington, DC 20530 Email: Burtis.M.Dougherty@usdoj.gov Email: Patricia.O’Beirne@usdoj.gov Phone: (202) 514-4713 Fax: (202) 514-1116 26 27 28 -4- 1 For All Defendants: 2 3 __/s/Kevin S. Asfour___________ 4 Kevin S. Asfour K&L Gates LLP 5 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 7th Floor 6 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Phone: +1.310.552.5016 7 Fax: +1.310.552.5001 8 kevin.asfour@klgates.com Counsel for Defendants 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?