Sprint Nextel Corporation et al v. Ezcom Inc et al
Filing
41
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS EZCOM, INC. D/B/A TRICOM COMMUNICATIONS AND MICHAEL LI WU; DAMAGES AWARDED AGAINST DEFENDANT EZCOM, INC. D/B/A TRICOM COMMUNICATIONS filed by Judge John F. Walter. Final judgment is hereby en tered only against Defendant EZCOM, Inc. d/b/a Tricom Communications and in favor of the Plaintiff Sprint Nextel, on all of the claims set forth in Sprint Nextel's Complaint in the principal amount of Five Million Dollars and Zero Cents. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (kbr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Matthew A. Lesnick (SBN 177594)
matt@lesnickprince.com
Andrew A. Cahill (SBN 233798)
acahill@lesnickprince.com
LESNICK PRINCE LLP
185 Pier Avenue, Suite 103
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Telephone: 310-396-0964
Facsimile: 310-396-0963
James B. Baldinger (Florida Bar No. 869899)
jbaldinger@carltonfields.com
David B. Esau (Florida Bar No. 650331)
desau@carltonfields.com
CARLTON FIELDS, P.A.
CityPlace Tower
525 Okeechobee Blvd, Suite 1200
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6350
Telephone: (561) 659-7070
Facsimile: (561) 659-7368
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
JS-6
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
SPRINT NEXTEL
CORPORATION, BOOST
WORLDWIDE, INC., AND
VIRGIN MOBILE USA, L.P.,
19
v.
21
EZCOM, INC. d/b/a TRICOM
COMMUNICATIONS, and
MICHAEL LI WU,
23
24
25
26
Defendants.
Judge: Hon. John F. Walter
Courtroom: 16
Complaint Filed: January 9, 2012
Trial Date: January 29, 2013
Plaintiffs,
20
22
Case No.: 12-CV-0222-JFW (VBKx)
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT
INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS
EZCOM, INC. D/B/A TRICOM
COMMUNICATIONS AND MICHAEL LI
WU; DAMAGES AWARDED AGAINST
DEFENDANT EZCOM, INC. D/B/A TRICOM
COMMUNICATIONS
27
28
1
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
1
2
Sprint Nextel Corporation, Boost Worldwide, Inc., and Virgin Mobile USA,
L.P. (“Sprint Nextel”), brought the above-captioned lawsuit against Defendants
3
4
EZCOM, Inc. d/b/a Tricom Communications and Michael Li Wu (“Defendants”),
5
alleging that Defendants are engaged in an unlawful enterprise involving the
6
acquisition, sale, and alteration of large quantities of Sprint Nextel, Boost Mobile,
7
8
and Virgin Mobile wireless telephones designed for use on Sprint affiliated wireless
9
service (collectively, “Sprint Nextel Handsets” or “Handsets”) and activation
10
materials, including but not limited to SIM cards, that causes substantial and
11
12
irreparable harm to Sprint Nextel (the “Bulk Handset Trafficking and Activation
13
Scheme”).
14
Defendants perpetrate the Bulk Handset Trafficking and Activation
Scheme by acquiring bulk quantities of Sprint Nextel Handsets, which often include
15
16
Sprint Nextel SIM cards, from retail stores, such as Best Buy, Wal-Mart or Target.
17
Defendants solicit others to purchase Sprint Nextel Handsets and SIM cards in bulk
18
for their benefit. Defendants acquire the Sprint Nextel Handsets with the actual or
19
20
constructive knowledge and intent that the Handsets will not be activated for use on
21
the Sprint Nextel wireless network, but that the Handsets will be computer-hacked.
22
23
The purpose of this hacking, known as “unlocking,” is to erase, remove, and/or
24
disable proprietary software installed in the Handset, which enables the use of the
25
Sprint Nextel Handsets exclusively on Sprint Nextel’s wireless system.
The
26
27
28
unlocked Handsets are then trafficked and resold overseas at a premium under the
Sprint Nextel trademarks for unauthorized use outside of Plaintiff’s wireless system,
2
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
1
2
and the SIM cards that come with the handsets are illicitly sold and/or fraudulently
activated to misappropriate airtime.
3
4
Sprint Nextel Handsets are sold subject to terms and conditions (“Terms and
5
Conditions”) which conspicuously restrict and limit the sale and use of the Sprint
6
Nextel Handsets. These Terms and Conditions are set forth in printed inserts that
7
8
are included in the packaging with every Sprint Nextel Handset and are also
9
available to the public on the Sprint Nextel websites. The Terms and Conditions are
10
also referenced in printed warnings that are placed on the outside of the retail
11
12
packaging of the Handsets.
13
packaging constitute a valid and binding contract.
14
The Terms and Conditions and language on the
Pursuant to the Terms and Conditions and the language on the packaging,
15
16
purchasers of Sprint Nextel Handsets agree, among other things, not to resell Sprint
17
Nextel products or services (including the Handsets), and not to use the Handsets for
18
any purpose that could damage or adversely affect Sprint Nextel.
19
20
As a result of the Defendants’ involvement in the Bulk Handset Trafficking
21
and Activation Scheme, Sprint Nextel has asserted claims against Defendants for
22
23
breach of contract, federal trademark infringement and false advertising under 15
24
U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(A) and (B), contributory trademark infringement, tortious
25
interference with business relationships and prospective advantage, civil conspiracy,
26
27
28
unjust enrichment, conspiracy to induce breach of contract, false advertising in
violation of California Business & Professions Code § 17500 et seq., unfair
3
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
1
2
competition in violation of California Business & Professions Code § 17200 et seq.,
harm to Sprint Nextel’s goodwill and business reputation, and violations of the
3
4
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1030 et seq. Based on the respective
5
positions advocated by the parties, and having reviewed the Complaint and file and
6
being otherwise duly and fully advised in the premises, it is hereby
7
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that:
8
9
10
1.
This Court has jurisdiction over all the parties and all of the claims set
forth in Sprint Nextel’s Complaint.
11
12
13
14
2.
The Court finds that Sprint Nextel has the right to use and enforce said
rights in the standard character marks Sprint, Boost Mobile, payLo, Assurance, and
Virgin Mobile, and the stylized Sprint and Boost Mobile Marks (collectively, the
15
16
“Sprint Nextel Marks”), as depicted below:
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Sprint Nextel uses the Sprint Nextel Marks on and in connection with its
26
telecommunications products and services. The Sprint Nextel Marks are valid,
27
28
4
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
1
2
distinctive, protectable, famous, have acquired secondary meaning, and are
associated exclusively with Sprint Nextel and Boost Mobile.
3
4
5
6
3.
The Court finds that the Terms and Conditions and the language in and
on the packaging constitute a valid and binding contract enforceable against
Defendants.
The Court finds that (a) facilitating others to use Sprint Nextel
7
8
Handsets in conjunction with service providers other than Sprint Nextel; (b) selling
9
Sprint Nextel Handsets, and (c) tampering with or altering Sprint Nextel Handsets,
10
SIM cards or the Handsets’ software; and/or entering unauthorized activation codes
11
12
in the Handsets for purposes of unlocking the Handsets or facilitating others in such
13
acts, constitute independent breaches of contract for which Sprint Nextel is entitled
14
to relief.
15
16
17
4.
The Court finds that the conduct set forth in the Complaint constitutes
violations of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(A) and (B) (federal trademark infringement and
18
false advertising). The Court further finds that the conduct constitutes contributory
19
20
trademark infringement, tortious interference with business relationships and
21
prospective advantage, civil conspiracy, unjust enrichment, conspiracy to induce
22
23
breach of contract, false advertising in violation of California Business &
24
Professions Code § 17500 et seq., unfair competition in violation of California
25
Business & Professions Code § 17200 et seq., harm to Sprint Nextel’s goodwill and
26
27
28
business reputation, and violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C.
§ 1030 et seq., and has caused substantial and irreparable harm to Sprint Nextel, and
5
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
1
2
will continue to cause substantial and irreparable harm to Sprint Nextel unless
enjoined.
3
4
5
6
5.
Sprint Nextel has suffered damages, including loss of goodwill and
damage to its reputation, as a result of Defendants’ conduct.
On review and
consideration of all relevant factors, Sprint Nextel is entitled to damages and
7
8
9
10
injunctive relief on the claims as set forth in the Complaint.
6.
Final judgment is hereby entered only against Defendant EZCOM, Inc.
d/b/a Tricom Communications and in favor of the Plaintiff Sprint Nextel, on all of
11
12
the claims set forth in Sprint Nextel’s Complaint in the principal amount of Five
13
Million Dollars and Zero Cents ($5,000,000.00 (U.S.)), which shall bear interest at
14
the legal rate, for which let execution issue forthwith.
15
16
17
7.
Defendants and all of their past and present officers, directors,
successors, assigns, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, related companies, predecessors-
18
in-interest, companies, agents, employees, heirs, personal representatives,
19
20
beneficiaries, relatives, and all other persons or entities acting or purporting to act
21
for it or on its behalf, including but not limited to any corporation, partnership,
22
23
proprietorship or entity of any type that is in any way affiliated or associated with
24
Defendants or Defendants’ representatives, agents, assigns, parent entities,
25
employees, independent contractors, associates, servants, affiliated entities, and any
26
27
and all persons and entities in active concert and participation with Defendants who
28
6
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
1
2
receive notice of this Order, shall be and hereby are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED
from:
3
4
a.
5
purchasing, selling, unlocking, reflashing, altering, advertising,
soliciting and/or shipping, directly or indirectly, any Sprint
6
Nextel Handsets or “Activation Materials,” which consist of SIM
7
8
cards, activation codes, and/or other mechanism, process or
9
materials used to activate service or acquire airtime in
10
connection with a new activation;
11
12
13
14
b.
purchasing, selling, unlocking, reflashing, altering, advertising,
soliciting and/or shipping, directly or indirectly, any Sprint
Nextel mobile device or SIM card that Defendants know or
15
16
should know bears any Sprint Nextel Marks or any marks likely
17
to cause confusion with the Sprint Nextel Marks, or any other
18
trademark, service mark, trade name and/or trade dress owned or
19
20
used by Sprint Nextel now or in the future, including but not
21
limited to Sprint, Nextel, Boost Mobile, payLo, Assurance
22
23
Wireless, and Virgin Mobile.
Specifically, Defendants are
24
enjoined from purchasing, selling, and/or shipping, directly or
25
indirectly, all models of Sprint Nextel Handsets and SIM cards
26
27
28
currently offered for sale by Sprint Nextel or that may be offered
for sale in the future, as listed and updated from time to time on
7
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
1
the
2
following
websites:
http://www.sprint.com,
http://www.boostmobile.com, http://www.virginmobileusa.com,
3
4
http://www.assurancewirelss.com, and http://www.paylo.com,
5
regardless of whether such devices are new or used, whether in
6
or out of their original packaging, or whether “locked,”
7
“unlocked,” or otherwise modified in any way by any person;
8
9
10
c.
unlocking of any Sprint Nextel Handset;
d.
accessing, altering, erasing, tampering with, deleting or
11
12
otherwise disabling the software contained in any Sprint Nextel
13
Handset;
14
e.
supplying Sprint Nextel Handsets or SIM cards to or facilitating
15
16
or in any way assisting other persons or entities who Defendants
17
knows or should know are engaged in unlocking Sprint Nextel
18
Handsets and/or hacking, altering, erasing, tampering with,
19
20
deleting or otherwise disabling the software installed in Sprint
21
Nextel Handsets;
22
23
f.
supplying Sprint Nextel Handsets or SIM cards to or facilitating
24
or in any way assisting other persons or entities who Defendants
25
know or should know are engaged in any of the acts prohibited
26
27
under this Permanent Injunction, including, without limitation,
28
8
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
1
the buying and/or selling of locked or unlocked Sprint Nextel
2
Handsets or SIM cards; and
3
g.
4
5
knowingly using the Sprint Nextel Marks or any other trademark,
service mark, trade name and/or trade dress owned or used by
6
Sprint Nextel now or in the future, or that is likely to cause
7
8
confusion with Sprint Nextel’s Marks, without Sprint Nextel’s
9
prior written authorization.
10
8.
The purchase, sale or shipment of any Sprint Nextel Handsets or SIM
11
12
cards without Sprint Nextel’s prior written consent within and/or outside of the
13
continental United States and/or the sale of Activation Materials is and shall be
14
deemed a presumptive violation of this permanent injunction.
15
16
17
9.
The address of Defendants is 1060 N. Hacienda Blvd., La Puente, CA
91744.
18
10.
The address of Plaintiff Sprint Nextel is 6200 Sprint Pkwy, Overland
19
20
21
Park, Kansas 66251.
11.
Defendants waive their right of appeal from the entry of this Final
22
23
24
25
Judgment.
12.
The Court retains jurisdiction over this matter and the parties to this
action in order to enforce any violation of the terms of this Permanent Injunction by
26
27
28
a finding of contempt and an order for payment of compensatory damages to Sprint
Nextel in an amount of $5,000 for each Sprint Nextel Handset or item of Activation
9
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
1
2
Material that a Defendant is found to have purchased, sold or unlocked in violation
of this Injunction. The Court finds that these amounts are compensatory and will
3
4
serve to compensate Sprint Nextel for its losses in the event Defendants violate the
5
terms of this Order.
6
13.
The Court hereby finds, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), that there is
7
8
no just reason for delay and orders that Judgment shall be entered against
9
Defendants as set forth herein.
10
DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of September, 2012.
11
12
13
14
___________________________________
HON. JOHN F. WALTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?