Juliana Lu v. Central Bank of Republic of China Taiwan et al
Filing
113
JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt,IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint is GRANTED and that the action is DISMISSED on the ground of lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Related to: Fourth MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction to Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint 95 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
JULIANA LU,
6
Plaintiff,
7
8
vs.
9
10
11
12
13
CENTRAL BANK OF REPUBLIC
OF CHINA (TAIWAN); TAIWAN
(R.O.C.); DOES 1 to 10, Inclusive,
Defendants.
______________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: LA CV12-00317-JAK (RZx)
Hon. John A. Kronstadt
JUDGMENT
JS-6
14
15
16
17
This action came before the Court on a Fourth Motion to Dismiss filed by
Defendants Central Bank of Republic of China (Taiwan) and Taiwan (R.O.C.).
18
Pursuant to the June 18, 2013 Order granting Defendants’ Fourth Motion to
19
Dismiss Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint (Dkt. 109), IT IS HEREBY
20
ADJUDGED that the Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint is
21
GRANTED and that the action is DISMISSED on the ground of lack of subject
22
matter jurisdiction.
23
24
25
DATED: June 27, 2013
_______________________________
The Honorable John A. Kronstadt
United States District Court Judge
26
27
28
1
JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?