Juliana Lu v. Central Bank of Republic of China Taiwan et al

Filing 113

JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt,IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint is GRANTED and that the action is DISMISSED on the ground of lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Related to: Fourth MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction to Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint 95 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 JULIANA LU, 6 Plaintiff, 7 8 vs. 9 10 11 12 13 CENTRAL BANK OF REPUBLIC OF CHINA (TAIWAN); TAIWAN (R.O.C.); DOES 1 to 10, Inclusive, Defendants. ______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: LA CV12-00317-JAK (RZx) Hon. John A. Kronstadt JUDGMENT JS-6 14 15 16 17 This action came before the Court on a Fourth Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Central Bank of Republic of China (Taiwan) and Taiwan (R.O.C.). 18 Pursuant to the June 18, 2013 Order granting Defendants’ Fourth Motion to 19 Dismiss Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint (Dkt. 109), IT IS HEREBY 20 ADJUDGED that the Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint is 21 GRANTED and that the action is DISMISSED on the ground of lack of subject 22 matter jurisdiction. 23 24 25 DATED: June 27, 2013 _______________________________ The Honorable John A. Kronstadt United States District Court Judge 26 27 28 1 JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?