Alex Rosas et al v. Leroy Baca et al

Filing 193

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CLASS COUNSELS ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. See order for details. (shb)

Download PDF
1 Jeremy D. Matz - State Bar No. 199401 jmatz@birdmarella.com 2 Kimberley M. Miller - State Bar No. 260280 kmiller@birdmarella.com 3 BIRD, MARELLA, BOXER, WOLPERT, NESSIM, DROOKS, LINCENBERG & RHOW, P.C. 4 1875 Century Park East, 23rd Floor Los Angeles, California 90067-2561 5 Telephone: (310) 201-2100 Facsimile: (310) 201-2110 6 Mary C. Wickham – State Bar No. 145664 mwickham@counsel.lacounty.gov 7 Rodrigo A. Castro-Silva – State Bar No. 185251 rcastro-silva@counsel.lacounty.gov 8 Amie S. Park – State Bar No. 273346 apark@counsel.lacounty.gov 9 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL 10 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street, #648 11 Los Angeles, California 90012-2713 Telephone: (213) 974-1804 · 12 Facsimile: (213) 626-7446 13 Attorneys for Defendant Los Angeles County 14 Sheriff Jim McDonnell 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 17 18 ALEX ROSAS and JONATHAN GOODWIN on behalf of themselves 19 and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 20 vs. 21 22 JIM MCDONNELL, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, in his official capacity, 23 Defendant. 24 25 CASE NO. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS Courtroom 9C Assigned to Hon. Dean D. Pregerson WHEREAS, the Parties executed a Settlement Agreement and Release of 26 Claims (the “Settlement Agreement”), which was filed with the Court on January 6, 27 2015 (Dkt. No. 110) and approved by the Court on April 21, 2015 (Dkt. No. 135) 28 after a fairness hearing; 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 WHEREAS, “Class Counsel” represent the Plaintiff Class and are defined in 2 the Settlement Agreement as the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU 3 Foundation of Southern California, and Paul Hastings, LLP; WHEREAS, pursuant to Section II of the Settlement Agreement, the Court 4 5 appointed a three-member Panel of Monitors (the “Panel”) to develop a corrective 6 action plan (the “Implementation Plan”, also sometimes known as the “Action 7 Plan”) “designed to ensure that the Plaintiff Class are not subjected to excessive 8 force in the Jail Complex in downtown Los Angeles” and authorized the Panel “to 9 monitor and advise the Court on Defendant’s compliance with the Action Plan”; WHEREAS, Section VI of the Settlement Agreement provides in full that: 10 On reasonable notice, Class Counsel will have reasonable access to the Jail Complex in downtown Los Angeles, including without limitation staff, inmates, and documents, for inspection to evaluate compliance with the Action Plan. Class Counsel shall provide Defendant’s counsel with 10 days’ notice before any document request and 4 days’ notice before any on-site inspection. Defendant’s counsel shall have the right to be present for any jail inspection and/or discussion with Sheriff’s Department personnel. Defendant reserves the right to object, whether on privilege grounds or otherwise, to any document request made by Class Counsel. The Parties agree to negotiate in good faith to resolve any disputes concerning objections to document requests from Class Counsel and if the dispute cannot be resolved, to submit the issue to the Court for resolution. Any information or documents obtained by Class Counsel under this section may be used solely for purposes of this action and may not be used in any other action for any purpose. Nothing in this section shall restrict monitoring activities by the ACLU (such as readily available access to Title 15 logs) in Rutherford v. Scott, Case No. CV 75-04111-DDP. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 WHEREAS, in 2016, Class Counsel made various document requests 23 24 pursuant to Section VI of the Settlement Agreement; WHEREAS, Defendant objected and continues to object to Class Counsel’s 25 26 document requests on various grounds; WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred regarding Class Counsel’s 27 28 document requests for more than a year to determine which, if any, documents 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 2 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 requested by Class Counsel would be produced by Defendant pursuant to Section VI 2 of the Settlement Agreement; WHEREAS, Defendant provided written policies in response to several of 3 4 Class Counsel’s requests for documents; WHEREAS, on September 18, 2017, Class Counsel filed a Notice of Motion 5 6 and Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement (“Motion to Enforce”) (Dkt. No. 7 152), seeking a Court order requiring Defendant to produce the documents requested 8 by Class Counsel; WHEREAS, on February 16, 2018, Defendant filed an Opposition to the 9 10 Motion to Enforce (Dkt. No. 179); WHEREAS, on February 23, 2018, Class Counsel filed a Reply in Support of 11 12 the Motion to Enforce (Dkt. No. 180); WHEREAS, in an effort to avoid additional time and expense, the parties 13 14 have engaged in a further, lengthy meet and confer process to resolve this dispute 15 without more litigation; WHEREAS, subject to the terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions set 16 17 forth below, Defendant has agreed to give Class Counsel access to certain 18 documents, materials, and information, without conceding that Class Counsel are 19 entitled to those documents, materials, or information under the Settlement 20 Agreement or otherwise; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have agreed to accept these documents, materials, and 21 22 information under the terms set forth herein, while reserving their right under the 23 terms of the Settlement Agreement to seek additional documents, materials, and 24 information (including video footage) beyond the documents, materials, and 25 information to be produced or made available to Class Counsel pursuant to this 26 Protective Order; WHEREAS, Defendant reserves his right under the terms of the Settlement 27 28 Agreement to object to any requests or demands by Class Counsel or by Plaintiffs 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 3 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 for any additional documents, materials, and information (including video footage) 2 beyond those to be produced or made available to Class Counsel pursuant to this 3 Protective Order; 4 WHEREAS, the Parties having stipulated and good cause appearing: 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 6 I. INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF GOOD CAUSE 7 A. 8 Plaintiffs are Alex Rosas and Jonathan Goodwin on behalf of themselves and Plaintiffs 9 unnamed class members, defined as “all present and future inmates confined in the 10 Jail Complex in downtown Los Angeles,” pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 11 Procedure 23(b)(2) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”). 12 B. 13 The defendant in this action is Los Angeles County Sheriff Jim McDonnell, in Defendant 14 his official capacity (“Defendant”). 15 C. 16 Good cause exists for entry of this Protective Order. Defendant has produced Statement of Good Cause 17 and continues to produce confidential and privileged information to the Panel 18 pursuant to the Settlement Agreement. Defendant’s position is that portions of this 19 information are protected by privileges including, but not limited to, the 20 investigatory files privilege, the official information privilege, and privacy rights 21 including, but not limited to, rights under the Health Insurance Portability and 22 Accountability Act (“HIPAA”). Class Counsel do not concede the applicability of 23 any such privilege to any information produced to the Panel. Limiting the 24 disclosure of these documents to the context of this litigation, as provided herein, 25 and as required by Section VI of the Settlement Agreement, will protect the 26 privileges and privacy rights of the Defendant and of Los Angeles County Sheriff’s 27 Department (“LASD”) employees, and of the Plaintiff Class, although Class 28 Counsel do not concede the applicability of any such privilege or privacy right to 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 4 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 any information produced to the Panel. In an effort to resolve their dispute concerning which documents Defendant 2 3 shall make available pursuant to Section VI of the Settlement Agreement and 4 Plaintiffs’ pending requests, Defendant has proposed, and Plaintiffs have agreed, 5 that subject to the terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions set forth below, 6 Defendant shall grant Class Counsel access to certain documents and materials, 7 without conceding that Class Counsel are entitled to those documents or materials 8 under the Settlement Agreement or otherwise. Class Counsel do not concede that 9 their access pursuant to Section VI of the Settlement Agreement is limited to the 10 terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions set forth below. Both parties agree to 11 abide and to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order. 12 II. DEFINITIONS 13 A. 14 “Party” means any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, Party 15 employees, consultants, retained experts, and legal counsel (and their support staff). 16 B. 17 “Confidential Information” means all information (regardless of how Confidential Information 18 generated, stored, maintained, produced, or made available) that is produced or 19 made available to Class Counsel by Defendant pursuant to and following the Court’s 20 entry of this Protective Order. Defendant need not stamp any information 21 “CONFIDENTIAL,” or otherwise use any particular legend or designation, prior to 22 producing or making available any such information to Class Counsel. All 23 information produced or made available to Class Counsel by Defendant pursuant to 24 and following the Court’s entry of this Protective Order shall receive all protections 25 provided by this Protective Order, and shall be subject to all terms, conditions, 26 limitations, and restrictions set forth in this Protective Order. Class Counsel do not 27 concede the applicability of any privilege or privacy right to the Confidential 28 Information produced pursuant to this Protective Order. 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 5 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 C. 2 “Class Counsel” means the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU Class Counsel 3 Foundation of Southern California, Paul Hastings LLP, and their non-attorney 4 employees, non-attorney consultants, retained experts, and legal counsel (and their 5 support staff) who are in compliance with Section V(D) of this Protective Order. 6 D. 7 For purposes of this Protective Order, “privilege” shall mean the attorney- Privilege 8 client privilege, the attorney-work product doctrine, the official information 9 privilege, and any other privilege or doctrine that may apply to Confidential 10 Information. 11 III. SCOPE 12 The terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions imposed by this Protective 13 Order cover not only Confidential Information but also any information copied or 14 extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, notes, audio files, or 15 compilations thereof. The terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions imposed 16 by this Protective Order also cover testimony, conversations, or presentations by 17 Parties or their counsel that might reveal Confidential Information to persons other 18 than Defendant or Class Counsel. However, the terms, conditions, limitations, and 19 restrictions imposed by this Protective Order do not cover any information known to 20 Class Counsel prior to entry of this Protective Order or obtained by Class Counsel 21 after entry of this Protective Order from a source who obtained the information 22 lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Defendant. Both Class 23 Counsel and Defendant reserve their rights to contend that this Protective Order 24 does or does not supersede or modify the Settlement Agreement, and neither Class 25 Counsel nor Defendant shall be deemed to have taken any position, or made any 26 agreement or concession, or assented in any way, on that issue merely by virtue of 27 stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order. All Parties agree and stipulate that 28 this Protective Order has no effect on existing rights and obligations of the Parties 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 6 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 except as expressly set forth herein. 2 IV. DURATION 3 The duties and obligations imposed by this Protective Order shall remain in 4 effect for all time unless and until Defendant agrees otherwise in writing or the 5 Court otherwise orders. 6 V. PRODUCTION, REVIEW, AND USE OF CONFIDENTIAL 7 INFORMATION 8 A. 9 Documents And Materials To Be Produced Or Made Available To Class Counsel By Defendant 10 1. Force Synopses Defendant has been providing the Panel with a cumulative Force Synopsis for 11 12 each force incident in the Downtown Jail Complex beginning January 1, 2017. The 13 Force Synopses that have been and will be produced to the Panel include 14 information relating to (a) force incidents as to which Defendant’s investigation is 15 still in progress, and also (b) force incidents as to which Defendant’s investigation is 16 completed. Pursuant to this Protective Order, Defendant shall produce to Class Counsel 17 18 the same Force Synopses that have been or will be produced to the Panel, with the 19 exception set forth below, via an on-line, cloud-based database system of 20 Defendant’s choosing (“the database system”). The Force Synopses produced to 21 Class Counsel via the database system will include information relating only to 22 force incidents as to which Defendant’s investigation is completed. Class Counsel 23 may access the database system from their own offices and residences, but not from 24 other locations. If Class Counsel wish to review the same Force Synopses that have 25 been or will be produced to the Panel, including information relating to force 26 incidents as to which Defendant’s investigation is still in progress, Class Counsel 27 may do so in person at the offices of Panel member Richard E. Drooyan. Class 28 Counsel may discuss the contents of the Force Synopses with any other member of 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 7 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 Class Counsel who is authorized to review Confidential Information, and may do so 2 in any format, including, but not limited to, email, text message, telephone 3 conversation, VOIP, written correspondence, and verbal communication. Class 4 Counsel may copy, download, photograph, email, publish, take screenshots of, or 5 otherwise reproduce or memorialize any contents of any Force Synopses, but only 6 for the following three purposes: (1) to communicate with other members of Class 7 Counsel who are authorized to review Confidential Information, (2) to communicate 8 with the Panel, or (3) to file relevant documents with the Court in this litigation 9 pursuant to the filing procedures set forth in Section V(F) of this Protective Order. 10 During any in-person review of any Force Synopsis at Mr. Drooyan’s office, Class 11 Counsel may take notes of any such Force Synopsis, but shall not download, 12 photograph, or take screenshots of any such Force Synopsis. Each Force Synopsis 13 shall be produced to Class Counsel via the database system for a period of 120 days 14 commencing from the date that such Force Synopsis is uploaded to the database 15 system. All productions of Force Synopses to Class Counsel shall be subject to the 16 terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions contained in this Protective Order. 17 2. Force Packages Defendant has also been providing the Panel with documents (“Force 18 19 Packages”) relating to force incidents selected by the Panel for review. Pursuant to this Protective Order, Defendant shall produce to Class Counsel 20 21 the same Force Packages that have been or will be produced to the Panel. 22 Defendant shall produce these Force Packages to Class Counsel via the database 23 system. Video footage contained within those Force Packages shall be produced 24 pursuant to the provisions, procedures, and limitations set forth in Section V(A)(4) 25 of this Protective Order. Class Counsel may access the database system from their 26 own offices and residences, but not from other locations. Class Counsel may 27 discuss the contents of the Force Packages with any other member of Class Counsel 28 who is authorized to review Confidential Information, and may do so in any format, 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 8 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 including, but not limited to, email, text message, telephone conversation, VOIP, 2 written correspondence, and verbal communication. Class Counsel may copy, 3 download, photograph, email, publish, take screenshots of, or otherwise reproduce 4 or memorialize any contents of any Force Packages, but only for the following three 5 purposes: (1) to communicate with other members of Class Counsel who are 6 authorized to review Confidential Information, (2) to communicate with the Panel, 7 or (3) to file relevant documents with the Court in this litigation pursuant to the 8 filing procedures set forth in Section V(F) of this Protective Order. Each Force 9 Package shall be produced to Class Counsel via the database system for a period of 10 120 days commencing from the date that such Force Package is uploaded to the 11 database system. All productions of Force Packages to Class Counsel shall be 12 subject to the terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions contained in this 13 Protective Order. 14 3. Additional Documents Produced To The Panel As requested by the Panel, Defendant has produced and will continue to 15 16 produce other documents to the Panel (in addition to the Force Synopses and Force 17 Packages) for the purpose of the Panel’s assessment and determination of 18 Defendant’s compliance with the Implementation Plan (“Panel Documents”). 19 Pursuant to this Protective Order, Defendant shall produce to Class Counsel the 20 same Panel Documents that have been or will be produced to the Panel beginning in 21 November 2016 and ending with the last Panel Documents that Defendant ever 22 produces to the Panel. Defendant shall produce the Panel Documents to Class 23 Counsel via the database system. Class Counsel may access the database system 24 from their own offices and residences, but not from other locations. Class Counsel 25 may discuss the contents of the Panel Documents with any other member of Class 26 Counsel who is authorized to review Confidential Information, and may do so in any 27 format, including, but not limited to, email, text message, telephone conversation, 28 VOIP, written correspondence, and verbal communication. Class Counsel may 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 9 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 copy, download, photograph, email, publish, take screenshots of, or otherwise 2 reproduce or memorialize any contents of any Panel Documents, but only for the 3 following three purposes: (1) to communicate with other members of Class Counsel 4 who are authorized to review Confidential Information, (2) to communicate with the 5 Panel, or (3) to file relevant documents with the Court in this litigation pursuant to 6 the filing procedures set forth in Section V(F) of this Protective Order. Each Panel 7 Document shall be produced to Class Counsel via the database system for a period 8 of 120 days commencing from the date that such Panel Document is uploaded to the 9 database system. All productions of Panel Documents to Class Counsel shall be 10 subject to the terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions contained in this 11 Protective Order. 12 4. Video Pursuant to this Protective Order, Defendant shall produce to Class Counsel 13 14 video footage associated with the Force Packages and Panel Documents that have 15 been or will be produced to the Panel as described in Sections V(A)(2) and V(A)(3) 16 of this Protective Order. Defendant shall produce such video footage to Class 17 Counsel via the database system. With regard to incidents as to which video is 18 produced via the database system, Class Counsel and Defendant understand and 19 agree that Defendant may (1) produce or make available to Class Counsel via the 20 database system only one camera angle recording of each such incident, and (2) 21 redact that camera angle recording as provided in Section V(B) of this Protective 22 Order. Class Counsel may access the database system from their own offices and 23 24 residences, but not from other locations. Class Counsel may discuss the video 25 footage with any other member of Class Counsel who is authorized to review 26 Confidential Information, and may do so in any format, including, but not limited to, 27 email, text message, telephone conversation, VOIP, written correspondence, and 28 verbal communication. Class Counsel may copy, download, photograph, email, 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 10 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 publish, take screenshots of, or otherwise reproduce or memorialize any video 2 footage, but only for the following three purposes: (1) to communicate with other 3 members of Class Counsel who are authorized to review Confidential Information, 4 (2) to communicate with the Panel, or (3) to file relevant documents with the Court 5 in this litigation pursuant to the filing procedures set forth in Section V(F) of this 6 Protective Order. All video footage described in this Section V(A)(4) shall be 7 produced to Class Counsel via the database system for a period of 120 days 8 commencing from the date that such video footage is uploaded to the database 9 system. All productions of video footage to Class Counsel shall be subject to the 10 terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions contained in this Protective Order. Class Counsel may request to view video footage described in this Section 11 12 V(A)(4) (i.e., the video footage associated with the Force Packages and Panel 13 Documents that have been or will be produced to the Panel as described in Sections 14 V(A)(2) and V(A)(3) of this Protective Order) pursuant to the notice period 15 provided in Section VI of the Settlement Agreement (i.e., ten days). This includes 16 requests for unredacted video footage and additional camera angle recordings of the 17 same incidents as to which a single camera angle recording was produced via the 18 database system. If, upon receiving notice and a request from Class Counsel to view 19 video footage, Defendant determines that additional time is needed to locate and 20 prepare the requested footage for viewing, Defendant may have up to twenty 21 additional days to do so, for a total of thirty days from Class Counsel’s initial notice 22 and request. Defendant must promptly notify Class Counsel if Defendant will not 23 be able to make the requested footage available for viewing within ten days of Class 24 Counsel’s initial notice and request. Defendant shall permit Class Counsel to view 25 all video footage requested by Class Counsel and within the scope of this Section 26 V(A)(4) (i.e., the video footage associated with the Force Packages and Panel 27 Documents that have been or will be produced to the Panel as described in Sections 28 V(A)(2) and V(A)(3) of this Protective Order) in unredacted format at the Twin 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 11 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 Towers Correctional Facility, on a secure computer terminal provided by Defendant. 2 Class Counsel’s review of this video footage shall be monitored by LASD, and 3 Class Counsel shall not download, duplicate, film, or otherwise capture, 4 disseminate, or reproduce video footage viewed pursuant to this paragraph. 5 B. 6 Before producing or making available to Class Counsel any Confidential Redactions Of Confidential Information 7 Information via the database system (including but not limited to documents and 8 video), Defendant reserves the right to redact names, faces, badge numbers, 9 identification numbers, and/or any other personal identifying information of 10 individual LASD or County employees, agents, officers, and deputies for purposes 11 of complying with all applicable laws, regulations, privacy requirements, and labor 12 and employment agreements. Class Counsel do not concede that redacting any 13 names, faces, badge numbers, identification numbers, and/or any other personal 14 identifying information of individual LASD or County employees, agents, officers, 15 and deputies is necessary for Defendant to comply with applicable laws, regulations, 16 privacy requirements, or labor and employment agreements, or that any redactions 17 of Confidential Information made pursuant to this section are in accordance with 18 applicable federal law. At all times up to termination of the Settlement Agreement, 19 Defendant shall maintain and preserve an unredacted version of all Confidential 20 Information, including specifically any documents or information produced to Class 21 Counsel pursuant to this Protective Order with any redactions of any kind. If, after receiving and reviewing any Confidential Information that in whole 22 23 or in part has been redacted, Class Counsel wish to receive the same Confidential 24 Information in unredacted form as part of their evaluation of Defendant’s 25 compliance with the Implementation Plan, Class Counsel shall specify for 26 Defendant the particular Confidential Information (e.g., particular documents and/or 27 video) that Class Counsel wish to receive in unredacted form and how the 28 unredacted information will assist Class Counsel in evaluating Defendant’s 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 12 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 compliance with the Implementation Plan. Defendant may specify any and all 2 reasons and bases why Defendant believes that the Confidential Information at issue 3 should continue to be produced or made available to Class Counsel only in redacted 4 form. Class Counsel and Defendant shall meet and confer in good faith to attempt 5 to resolve any request for unredacted Confidential Information. If Class Counsel 6 and Defendant cannot resolve a request for unredacted Confidential Information, 7 Class Counsel may submit the issue to the Court to determine whether or not 8 Defendant must provide Class Counsel with the requested unredacted Confidential 9 Information pursuant to applicable federal law. Any such submission to the Court 10 must be made in accordance with the filing procedures set forth in Section V(F) of 11 this Protective Order. 12 C. 13 Medical And Other Information Pertaining To Plaintiff Class Members Notwithstanding the confidentiality restrictions of HIPAA, the California 14 15 Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (Civil Code § 56, et seq.), and 16 California Welfare and Institutions Code § 5328 (related to confidentiality of mental 17 health records), Class Counsel’s access to Confidential Information pursuant to this 18 Protective Order shall include medical and mental health information and data 19 pertaining to LASD inmates who are members of the Plaintiff Class. This 20 information and data will include “protected health information” as that term is 21 defined in HIPAA. Defendant is hereby expressly authorized and permitted to 22 disclose to Class Counsel any and all protected health information of or pertaining 23 to members of the Plaintiff Class, pursuant to Title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, 24 § 164.512(e)(1). Class Counsel do not concede that the privileges, restrictions, or 25 statutes listed in this paragraph are applicable to any Confidential Information 26 withheld, redacted, or produced by Defendant pursuant to the Protective Order or 27 would provide for withholding documents or portions of documents in federal 28 litigation. 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 13 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 D. 2 Attorneys who are members of Class Counsel may review Confidential Persons Authorized To Review Confidential Information 3 Information. Additionally, Class Counsel’s non-attorney employees or consultants 4 with a legitimate need and reason to review Confidential Information for purposes 5 of evaluating Defendant’s compliance with the Implementation Plan, and experts 6 retained by Class Counsel to assist Class Counsel with its evaluation of Defendant’s 7 compliance with the Implementation Plan, may also review Confidential 8 Information, provided such non-attorney employees or consultants and retained 9 experts first execute the following written statement: 10 “I, _____________________________, acknowledge that I have reviewed 11 and am familiar with the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order Regarding 12 Class Counsel’s Access To Documents (“Stipulated Protective Order”) 13 entered in CV 12-428-DDP(MRWx), and I hereby agree to comply with and 14 to be bound by the terms and conditions of said Stipulated Protective Order, 15 to the same extent as the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU 16 Foundation of Southern California, and Paul Hastings LLP, with respect to 17 the handling, review, use, and disclosure of any Confidential Information. 18 Dated: __________ /s/_____________________________” 19 Class Counsel shall be responsible for maintaining the signed original of each 20 such written statement until the termination of the Settlement Agreement. Class 21 Counsel shall provide Defendant with copies of such written statements upon the 22 written request of Defendant. In addition, Class Counsel shall maintain a log of all 23 persons who viewed Confidential Information and shall provide Defendant with a 24 copy of said log upon the written request of Defendant. Other than Class Counsel attorneys, and any non-attorney employees and 25 26 non-employee experts who execute the foregoing written statement, no one else may 27 review, be given access to, or otherwise be purposefully exposed to any Confidential 28 Information or any transcript, quotation, paraphrase, summary, notes, or other 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 14 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 description containing or referring to Confidential Information, other than the Court 2 as set forth in Section V(F) and the Panel. 3 E. 4 Confidential Information shall not be used, handled, reviewed, or disclosed Limitations On Use Of Confidential Information 5 for any purpose or in any manner inconsistent with the Settlement Agreement or 6 with this Protective Order. Any use, handling, review, or disclosure of Confidential 7 Information prohibited by the Settlement Agreement or by this Protective Order 8 shall constitute a violation of this Protective Order. Class Counsel’s receipt and use 9 of Confidential Information pursuant to this Protective Order shall not be subject to 10 any restrictions, limitations, or any obligations other than those specified in this 11 Protective Order or in Section VI of the Settlement Agreement. In the event of any unauthorized use, handling, review, or disclosure of 12 13 Confidential Information by Class Counsel or by Class Counsel’s non-attorney 14 employees or non-employee experts (whether inadvertent or otherwise), Class 15 Counsel must immediately notify Defendant and the Court in writing of the 16 unauthorized use, handling, review, or disclosure. 17 F. 18 Procedures For The Filing Of Any Confidential Information With The Court All filings with the Court of any Confidential Information by any Party shall 19 20 first be made under seal and (except as permitted under Section V(I) of this 21 Protective Order) shall be served on all other Parties pursuant to Central District of 22 California Local Rule 79-5.2.2. Both Parties agree to accept service via email for 23 any filing made pursuant to this Section V(F). By entering this Protective Order, the Court grants leave, pursuant to Central 24 25 District of California Local Rule 79-5.2.2(c), to file under seal any filing made 26 under this Section V(F). Accordingly, the Parties need not comply with Central 27 District of California Local Rule 79-5.2.2(b). All filings made with the Court 28 pursuant to this Section V(F) must state on the caption page, immediately under the 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 15 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 title of the document, “FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO ORDER OF THE 2 COURT DATED []”, with the date of entry of this Protective Order included within 3 the brackets. Any filing made pursuant to this Section V(F) must comply with all 4 other applicable Central District of California Local Rules. Class Counsel reserve the right to move the Court to determine whether any 5 6 Confidential Information may be publicly filed in this litigation pursuant to 7 applicable federal law. Class Counsel shall meet and confer with Defendant 8 pursuant to Central District of California Local Rule 7-3 prior to making any such 9 motion. Defendant reserves the right to oppose any such motion. Class Counsel 10 shall not publicly file any Confidential Information without the Court’s or 11 Defendant’s prior written authorization. In the event that Class Counsel files a motion under this Section V(F) with 12 13 the Court that concerns Confidential Information that is not in Class Counsel’s 14 possession (such as unredacted video footage), Defendant agrees to provide this 15 Confidential Information to the Court in camera. 16 G. 17 Return Or Destruction Of Confidential Information By Class Counsel Upon termination of the Settlement Agreement by order of the Court, Class 18 19 Counsel shall destroy, or shall return to Defendant, all copies (electronic, hard, or 20 other) of all Confidential Information that was ever produced or made available to 21 Class Counsel and which is in Class Counsel’s possession. Upon such destruction 22 or return of Confidential Information, Class Counsel shall also provide Defendant 23 with the following certification in writing: 24 “I, ______________________, am a member of Class Counsel as defined in 25 CV 12-428-DDP(MRWx). On behalf of all Class Counsel, I hereby certify 26 that all copies (electronic, hard, or other) of all Confidential Information that 27 was ever produced or made available to Class Counsel and which is in Class 28 Counsel’s possession have been destroyed or returned to Defendant, in 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 16 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 accordance with Section V(G) of the Stipulated Protective Order Regarding 2 Class Counsel’s Access To Documents.” 3 H. 4 No Possession By Plaintiff Class Members Of Confidential Information Neither Plaintiffs nor any other current or former inmate of the Los Angeles 5 6 County jails shall have access to or possession of, or be exposed to, any Confidential 7 Information, or any material derived therefrom, except that nothing in this paragraph 8 shall prevent Class Counsel from showing a Plaintiff class member his or her own 9 medical records. 10 I. 11 Notwithstanding the entry of this Protective Order, there may be some Disputes Over Discoverability Of Information 12 information otherwise within the scope of Section V(A) of this Protective Order that 13 Defendant believes cannot be disclosed to Class Counsel consistent with 14 Defendant’s legitimate operational and security concerns relating to the operation of 15 the Los Angeles County jails. In the event that Defendant withholds any such 16 information from Class Counsel on this basis, Defendant shall promptly notify Class 17 Counsel of such determination (via a privilege log or similar report). To the extent 18 that Class Counsel objects to Defendant’s withholding of any such information, 19 Class Counsel and Defendant shall promptly meet and confer regarding the issue. If 20 Class Counsel’s concerns are not resolved via such meet-and-confer process, then 21 the Parties shall submit the issue to the Court for resolution. In the course of 22 making any such submission to the Court, Defendant may file any information in 23 camera, and need not serve such information on Class Counsel. The Court shall 24 then decide whether Defendant must produce the withheld information to Class 25 Counsel. 26 J. 27 Nothing in this Protective Order constitutes any ruling or finding by the Court No Waiver Of Objections 28 concerning the scope or interpretation of the Settlement Agreement. Nothing in this 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 17 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 Protective Order or in the Parties’ stipulations constitutes a waiver by any Party of 2 any right to make requests for documents pursuant to Section VI of the Settlement 3 Agreement, or to object to any such requests. Nothing in this Protective Order or in 4 the Parties’ stipulations constitutes any admission or position by any Party regarding 5 the scope, meaning, proper interpretation, or applicability of any provision(s) of the 6 Settlement Agreement, or of any privilege, statute, or regulation referenced herein. 7 By entering into these stipulations, Defendant does not waive any privileges that 8 may or may not apply, including but not limited to the attorney-client privilege, 9 attorney work product doctrine, or the investigatory files or official information 10 privileges. See, e.g., Weiner v. FBI, 943 F. 2d 972, 985 (9th Cir. 1991); Miller v. 11 Pancucci, 141 F.R.D. 292 (C.D. Cal. 1992). By entering into these stipulations, 12 Class Counsel do not concede that any privilege or statutory or regulatory 13 protection, including but not limited to the attorney-client privilege, attorney work 14 product doctrine, or the investigatory files or official information privileges, applies 15 to any Confidential Information that has been, is being, or will be produced by 16 Defendant pursuant to and after entry of this Protective Order. In addition, the 17 inadvertent production or disclosure of Confidential Information that may be 18 privileged shall be without prejudice to any claim of privilege, and Defendant shall 19 not be held to have waived any rights or privileges by such inadvertent production. 20 K. 21 In the event that Class Counsel receives a subpoena, discovery request, or Subpoena For Confidential Information 22 other legal process seeking production of Confidential Information, Class Counsel 23 shall give prompt written notice to Defendant. Class Counsel shall inform the 24 person or entity seeking the information of the existence of this Protective Order and 25 shall not produce any Confidential Information, or any document or communication 26 referencing or containing any portion of Confidential Information, absent a Court 27 order requiring such production. 28 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 18 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 L. 2 For good cause, any Party may seek a modification of this Protective Order, Modification 3 first by attempting to obtain the consent of the other Parties to such modification, 4 and then, absent consent, by application to the Court. However, no modification 5 based on consent of the other Parties shall be valid or effective unless in writing 6 signed by all Parties. 7 M. 8 This Protective Order shall survive the conclusion of this action, and the Survivability Of This Protective Order 9 Court retains jurisdiction to enforce it. 10 // 11 // 12 // 13 // 14 // 15 // 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 19 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 1 VI. WITHDRAWAL BY PLAINTIFFS OF MOTION TO ENFORCE 2 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 3 Upon entry of this Protective Order by the Court, Plaintiffs shall withdraw 4 their Motion to Enforce (Dkt. No. 152). 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 DATED: May 11, 2018 Hon. Dean D. Pregerson Senior United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3491358.1 Case No. CV 12-00428 DDP (MRW) 20 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CLASS COUNSEL’S ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?