Jose Carlos Rodriguez v. Matthew Cate
Filing
54
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Judge Cormac J. Carney for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 47 . (ca)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JOSE CARLOS RODRIGUEZ,
Petitioner,
11
12
13
v.
MATTHEW CATE,
14
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. CV 12-753-CJC (PJW)
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND
DENYING CERTIFICATE OF
APPEALABILITY
15
16
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the
17
Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the
18
United States Magistrate Judge.
19
de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has
20
objected.
21
Magistrate Judge.
22
Further, the Court has engaged in a
The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the
Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and
23
Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a
24
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and
25
therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied.
26
27
28
See 28 U.S.C.
1
ยง 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S.
2
322, 336 (2003).
3
4
DATED:
October 2, 2013.
5
6
7
CORMAC J. CARNEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C:\Temp\notesE1EF34\Order accep r&r Re Rodriguez v. Cate.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?