Jose Carlos Rodriguez v. Matthew Cate

Filing 54

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Judge Cormac J. Carney for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 47 . (ca)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, 11 12 13 v. MATTHEW CATE, 14 Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. CV 12-753-CJC (PJW) ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 15 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the 17 Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the 18 United States Magistrate Judge. 19 de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has 20 objected. 21 Magistrate Judge. 22 Further, the Court has engaged in a The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and 23 Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a 24 substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and 25 therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. 26 27 28 See 28 U.S.C. 1 ยง 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 2 322, 336 (2003). 3 4 DATED: October 2, 2013. 5 6 7 CORMAC J. CARNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C:\Temp\notesE1EF34\Order accep r&r Re Rodriguez v. Cate.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?