Nelson et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al

Filing 270

JUDGMENT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants Crane Co., The Nash Engineering Company, Alfa Laval, Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., Buffalo Pumps, Inc., and Union Carbide Corp. shall have judgment against Plaintiff Rosalie Jean Nelson, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Roger Ellis Nelson, Deceased (Plaintiff), and that Plaintiff take nothing. (kbr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 CASE NO. 2:12-cv-00793-MWF (AGRx) ROSALIE JEAN NELSON, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of ROGER ELLIS NELSON, Deceased, JUDGMENT Plaintiff, v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION; et al., Defendants. On February 12, 2013, the Court granted the six Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants (1) Crane Co., (2) The Nash Engineering Company, (3) Alfa Laval, (4) Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., (5) Buffalo Pumps, Inc., and (6) Union Carbide Corp. (Docket No. 258). Finding that good cause exists for entry of a separate judgment under Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants Crane Co., The Nash Engineering Company, Alfa Laval, Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., Buffalo Pumps, Inc., and Union Carbide Corp. shall have judgment against Plaintiff Rosalie Jean Nelson, Individually and as Personal 28 LA:18029541.1 1 Representative of the Estate of Roger Ellis Nelson, Deceased (“Plaintiff”), and that 2 Plaintiff take nothing; 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the 4 judgment entered against the Plaintiff herein and any other judgments entered 5 heretofore or hereafter in this action with respect to any other Defendant are several 6 as to each such Defendant unless otherwise expressly stated in the judgment to be 7 joint and several as to the particular Defendants; and 8 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there is no just reason for delay in entry of this final judgment against Plaintiff herein and the Court expressly directs that 10 the Clerk of the Court enter this separate judgment against said Plaintiff herein 11 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 notwithstanding whether this action 12 remains pending against other Defendants. 13 14 15 Dated: April 11, 2013 _________________________________ MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD United States District Court Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 LA:18029541.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?