Nelson et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
Filing
270
JUDGMENT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants Crane Co., The Nash Engineering Company, Alfa Laval, Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., Buffalo Pumps, Inc., and Union Carbide Corp. shall have judgment against Plaintiff Rosalie Jean Nelson, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Roger Ellis Nelson, Deceased (Plaintiff), and that Plaintiff take nothing. (kbr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-00793-MWF (AGRx)
ROSALIE JEAN NELSON,
Individually and as Personal
Representative of the Estate of
ROGER ELLIS NELSON, Deceased,
JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
v.
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS
CORPORATION; et al.,
Defendants.
On February 12, 2013, the Court granted the six Motions for Summary
Judgment filed by Defendants (1) Crane Co., (2) The Nash Engineering Company,
(3) Alfa Laval, (4) Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., (5) Buffalo Pumps, Inc., and (6)
Union Carbide Corp. (Docket No. 258). Finding that good cause exists for entry of
a separate judgment under Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that
Defendants Crane Co., The Nash Engineering Company, Alfa Laval, Kaiser
Gypsum Company, Inc., Buffalo Pumps, Inc., and Union Carbide Corp. shall have
judgment against Plaintiff Rosalie Jean Nelson, Individually and as Personal
28
LA:18029541.1
1
Representative of the Estate of Roger Ellis Nelson, Deceased (“Plaintiff”), and that
2
Plaintiff take nothing;
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the
4
judgment entered against the Plaintiff herein and any other judgments entered
5
heretofore or hereafter in this action with respect to any other Defendant are several
6
as to each such Defendant unless otherwise expressly stated in the judgment to be
7
joint and several as to the particular Defendants; and
8
9
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there is no just reason for delay in entry
of this final judgment against Plaintiff herein and the Court expressly directs that
10
the Clerk of the Court enter this separate judgment against said Plaintiff herein
11
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 notwithstanding whether this action
12
remains pending against other Defendants.
13
14
15
Dated: April 11, 2013
_________________________________
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD
United States District Court Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
LA:18029541.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?