Color Me Mine Enterprises Inc v. Southern States Marketing Inc et al

Filing 285

JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT TOYS "R" US, INC by Judge R. Gary Klausner: Judgment is entered in favor of Toys R Us; Toys R Us is the prevailing party; Plaintiff is not entitled to recovery of actual damages from Toys R Us; Plaintiff is not enti tled to recovery of profits from Toys R Us; Plaintiffs demand for an injunction from Toys R Us is denied as moot; Toys R Us are awarded their costs; and Toys R Us reserves its rights to seek its attorneys' fees pursuant to 15 U.S.C. section1117(a) as the prevailing party, upon appropriate motion filed with the Court within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order. (ir)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Lewis Anten, Esq., SBN 56459 Ivy Choderker, Esq., SBN 210612 lewisanten@mindspring.com LEWIS ANTEN, A PROFESSIONAL CORP. 16830 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 236 Encino, California 91436 Telephone: (818) 501-3535 NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT Facsimile: (818) 501-4138 Attorneys for Defendants Southern States Marketing, Inc.; Peachtree Playthings, Inc.; Peachtree Playthings (HK) Ltd.; Walgreen Co.; Michaels Stores, Inc.; Mary Maxim, Inc.; Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.; Toys “R” Us, Inc.; CVS Caremark Corporation; and Four Seasons General Merchandise, Inc. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 CASE NO.: CV 12-00860 RGK (JCx) COLOR ME MINE ENTERPRISES, INC., a California corporation, [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT TOYS “R” US, INC. 16 17 Plaintiff, vs. 18 19 SOUTHERN STATES MARKETING, INC., a Georgia corporation, et al., 20 21 Defendants. Trial Date: May 14, 2013 Time: 9:00 a.m. Judge: The Hon. R. Gary Klausner Courtroom: 850 22 23 24 25 26 1 27 C:\Temp\notesD30550\Exhibit C - PROPOSED JUDGMENT TOYS R US.doc 1 2 WHEREAS, the Court, in its Order Re: Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 169); Retail Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary 3 4 5 6 Judgment (DE 160); Defendants Peachtree Playthings HK Ltd, Peachtree Playthings Inc., and Southern States Marketing, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 163) (Pacer Docket No. 236) granted summary judgment of no 7 8 9 10 monetary recovery and no willfulness in favor Defendants Toys “R” Us, Inc., CVS Caremark Corporation, Mary Maxim, Inc., Four Seasons General Merchandise, Inc., Michaels Stores, Inc. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. , Walgreen Co., and Wal- 11 12 13 14 Mart Stores, Inc. (collectively, “Retail Defendants”); and WHEREAS, Toys “R” Us, Inc. (“Toys R Us”) never sold any products purchased from Peachtree Playthings, Inc., Peachtree Playthings (HK) Ltd., or 15 16 Southern States Marketing, Inc. bearing the name “Color Me Mine” or “Mine To 17 Color”; and 18 WHEREAS a determination on the validity and infringement of Plaintiff’s 19 20 Service Mark “Color Me Mine,” and the granting of an injunction, is moot the 21 Court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant Toys R Us as to all claims; 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 23 24 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Toys R Us; 25 2. Toys R Us is the prevailing party; 26 2 27 C:\Temp\notesD30550\Exhibit C - PROPOSED JUDGMENT TOYS R US.doc 1 2 3. Plaintiff is not entitled to recovery of actual damages from Toys R Us; 4. Plaintiff is not entitled to recovery of profits from Toys R Us; 3 4 5 6 5. Plaintiff’s demand for an injunction from Toys R Us is denied as moot; 6. Toys R Us are awarded their costs; and 7 8 9 10 7. Toys R Us reserves its rights to seek its attorneys’ fees pursuant to 15 U.S.C. section1117(a) as the prevailing party, upon appropriate motion filed with the Court within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order. 11 12 13 Dated: May 6, 2013 ____________________________ R.Gary Klausner U.S. District Court Judge 14 15 Respectfully submitted, 16 LEWIS ANTEN, P.C. 17 18 19 20 21 Dated: /s/ Lewis Anten LEWIS ANTEN IVY CHODERKER Attorneys for Defendant Toys R Us 22 23 24 25 26 3 27 C:\Temp\notesD30550\Exhibit C - PROPOSED JUDGMENT TOYS R US.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?