Victoria Adams v. Starbucks Corporation et al

Filing 18

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott re Stipulation for Protective Order 17 . The terms set forth in the Stipulation Re Protective Order Re Confidential Discovery Material shall be implemented. (san)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
GREGORY W. KNOPP (SBN 237615)
DAMIEN P. DELANEY (SBN 246476)
GALIT AVITAN KNOTZ (SBN 252962)
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, California 90067-3012
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310-229-1001
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
STARBUCKS CORPORATION

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13

VICTORIA ADAMS, an individual,

14
15
16
17

DISCOVERY MATTER

Plaintiff,
vs.
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a
Washington corporation; and DOES 110, inclusive,

18

Defendants.

Case No. 2:12-cv-00926 ODW (JEMx)

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE
ORDER RE: CONFIDENTIAL
DISCOVERY MATERIAL
Magistrate Judge: Hon. John E. McDermott
Courtroom:
C – 8th Floor

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
102997382

1
2
3
4
5
6

The Court, having considered the Stipulation for Protective Order re Confidential
Discovery Material (“Stipulation”) submitted by Defendant Starbucks Corporation
(“Defendant”) and plaintiff Victoria Adams, and finding good cause shown, hereby
orders as follows: .
The terms set forth in the Stipulation Re Protective Order Re Confidential
Discovery Material shall be implemented.

7
8

Dated: March 26, 2012

/s/John E. McDermott_________
Hon. John E. McDermott
United States Magistrate Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
102997382