Everymd v. Rick Santorum et al

Filing 5

AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Plaintiff Everymd. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL (Weyer, Frank)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Frank M. Weyer, Esq. (State Bar No. 127011) TECHCOASTLAW® 2032 Whitley Ave. Los Angeles CA 90068 Telephone: (310) 494-6616 Facsimile: (310) 494-9089 fweyer@techcoastlaw.com 5 6 Attorney for Plaintiff EVERYMD 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) ) EVERYMD, a partnership, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) ) RICK SANTORUM, MITT ) ROMNEY, NEWT GINGRICH, ) GOLDMAN SACHS, J.P. ) MORGAN and DOES 1 - 10 ) ) Defendants. ) ) Civil Action No. CV12-01623 DDP (JEMx) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 21 22 23 COMES NOW, Plaintiff EVERYMD and on information and belief alleges as follows: 24 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 25 26 27 1. This is an action for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 et. seq. and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). 28 -1- First Amended Complaint 1 2 3 4 5 2. The acts of patent infringement alleged herein occurred within this judicial district, Plaintiff resides in this district, and Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in this district. Therefore, venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), (c), and 1400(b). PARTIES 6 7 3. Plaintiff EVERYMD (“EVERYMD”) is a partnership of Frank Weyer 8 (“Weyer”) and Troy Javaher (“Javaher”). EVERYMD has a place of business at 2032 9 Whitley Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90068. 10 4. Defendant RICK SANTORUM (“SANTORUM”) is a Facebook business 11 account holder whose Facebook page has a URL of 12 https://www.facebook.com/RickSantorum. SANTORUM has a place of business at 13 Post Office Box 37, Verona, PA 15147. 14 15 16 17 18 19 5. Defendant MITT ROMNEY (“ROMNEY”) is a Facebook business account holder whose Facebook page has a URL of https://www.facebook.com/mittromney. ROMNEY has a place of business at 585 Commercial St., Boston, MA 02109. 6. Defendant NEWT GINGRICH (“GINGRICH”) is a Facebook business 20 account holder whose Facebook page has a URL of 21 https://www.facebook.com/newtgingrich. GINGRICH has a place of business at 3110 22 Maple Drive, Suite 400, Atlanta GA 30305. 23 7. Defendant GOLDMAN SACHS (“GOLDMAN SACHS”) is an 24 underwriter for Facebook, Inc.’s upcoming IPO and a Facebook business account 25 holder whose Facebook page has a URL of 26 https://www.facebook.com/pages/Goldman-Sachs/6023516099. GOLDMAN SACHS 27 has a place of business at 555 California Street, 45th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104. 28 -2- First Amended Complaint 1 2 3 4 5 6 8. Defendant J.P. MORGAN (“JP MORGAN”) is an underwriter for Facebook, Inc.’s upcoming IPO and a Facebook business account holder whose Facebook page has a URL of https://www.facebook.com/jpmorgancommunity. JP MORGAN has a place of business at 560 Mission St., San Francisco, CA 94105. 9. Defendants Does 1 – 1000 are each a presently unidentified one of an 7 estimated 4,000,000 additional Facebook business account holders that are subject to 8 the jurisdiction of this court. 9 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION PATENT INFRINGEMENT PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. 271(g) 10 11 10. EVERYMD incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 – 7 as though fully 12 set forth herein. 13 11. EVERYMD has operated the website www.everymd.com since 2001. 12. EVERYMD’s website at www.everymd.com provides home pages for 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 over 300,000 member doctors and allows patients to obtain information about, send messages to, and submit comments about those doctors via the doctors’ individual home pages. 13. Prior to November 1999, EVERYMD invented numerous novel technologies during development of its website. 14. EVERYMD filed U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/447,755 entitled 22 “Method Apparatus and Business System for Online Communications with Online 23 and Offline Recipients” on November 23, 1999. 24 15. EVERYMD is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 6,671,714 entitled “Method, 25 Apparatus and Business System for Online Communications with Online and Offline 26 Recipients” (“the ‘714 patent”). 27 28 16. The ‘714 patent is based on the ‘755 application and issued on December 30, 2003. -3- First Amended Complaint 1 2 3 4 17. EVERYMD is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 7,644,122 entitled “Method, Apparatus and Business System for Online Communications with Online and Offline Recipients” (“the ‘122 patent”). 5 18. 6 January 5, 2010. 7 19. 8 9 The ‘122 patent is based on the ‘755 application and issued on December EVERYMD owns additional pending patent applications that are based on the ‘755 application. 20. The ‘122 patent is valid and in full force and effect. 21. EVERYMD has given notice of its patent rights by marking its website at 10 11 12 13 www.everymd.com with the ‘122 patent number. 22. The ‘122 patent is directed to a novel method for creating individual 14 home pages for members of a group of members that contain controls for sending 15 messages to and for submitting comments about the members. 16 23. Third party Facebook, Inc. (“FACEBOOK”) utilizes the method of the 17 ‘122 patent to create individual home pages (“FACEBOOK PAGES”) for its 18 individual members. 19 24. In 2011, EVERYMD offered to sell the ‘122 patent to FACEBOOK. 25. FACEBOOK rejected EVERYMD’s offer, and EVERYMD’s offer has 20 21 22 23 expired. 26. Defendants each use FACEBOOK PAGES produced by FACEBOOK 24 using the method of the ‘122 patent for commercial purposes by placing 25 advertisements and proportional messages on one or more of such FACEBOOK 26 PAGES. 27 28 27. FACEBOOK’s use of the method of the ‘122 patent to produce FACEBOOK PAGES is unauthorized. -4- First Amended Complaint 1 2 3 4 5 6 28. FACEBOOK’s failure to purchase the ‘122 patent or otherwise obtain rights under the ‘122 patent leaves holders of FACEBOOK business accounts liable for infringement of the ‘122 patent for unauthorized commercial use of FACEBOOK PAGES produced by FACEBOOK using the method of the ‘122 patent. 29. On January 23, 2011, EVERYMD announced a limited time reduced- 7 price patent licensing program under which holders of FACEBOOK business 8 accounts could avoid liability for infringement of the ‘122 patent by voluntarily 9 purchasing licenses to the ‘122 patent for a reduced price of $500 per FACEBOOK 10 business account. EVERYMD’s reduced price voluntary licensing program has 11 ended. 12 13 14 15 30. None of defendants have taken advantage of EVERYMD’s voluntary licensing program, which is now no longer available to them. 31. Defendants each have actual notice of EVERYMD’s patent rights but Defendants continue to act in conscious and willful disregard of those rights. 16 17 18 19 32. Defendants’ infringements of EVERYMD’s patent rights have irreparably damaged EVERYMD and will continue to cause irreparable harm unless enjoined by the Court. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5- First Amended Complaint 1 DEMAND FOR RELIEF 2 3 WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs ask this Court to: 4 a. 5 6 Enter judgment for EVERYMD against each Defendant on this Complaint; b. Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin each Defendant, 7 and all those in privity with each such Defendant, from further infringement of the 8 ‘122 patent during the remaining term of the patent; 9 10 c. Award compensatory damages to EVERYMD and to increase those damages three times in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 284; 11 12 d. Award EVERYMD reasonable attorneys’ fees in accordance with 35 13 U.S.C. § 285; 14 e. Award EVERYMD interest and costs; and 15 f. Award EVERYMD such other and further relief as is just and proper. 16 17 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 18 19 Plaintiffs hereby demand a trial by jury of all issues so triable. 20 Respectfully submitted, TECHCOASTLAW® 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 7, 2012 By: _________________________________ Frank M. Weyer (State Bar No. 127011) 2032 Whitley Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90068 (310) 494-6616 Fax (310) 494-9089 fweyer@techcoastlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff EVERYMD -6- First Amended Complaint

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?