Everymd v. Rick Santorum et al
Filing
5
AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Plaintiff Everymd. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL (Weyer, Frank)
1
2
3
4
Frank M. Weyer, Esq. (State Bar No. 127011)
TECHCOASTLAW®
2032 Whitley Ave.
Los Angeles CA 90068
Telephone: (310) 494-6616
Facsimile: (310) 494-9089
fweyer@techcoastlaw.com
5
6
Attorney for Plaintiff
EVERYMD
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
)
)
)
EVERYMD, a partnership,
)
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v.
)
)
)
)
RICK SANTORUM, MITT
)
ROMNEY, NEWT GINGRICH,
)
GOLDMAN SACHS, J.P.
)
MORGAN and DOES 1 - 10
)
)
Defendants. )
)
Civil Action No.
CV12-01623 DDP (JEMx)
FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
INFRINGEMENT
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
21
22
23
COMES NOW, Plaintiff EVERYMD and on information and belief alleges as
follows:
24
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
25
26
27
1.
This is an action for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 et. seq.
and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
28
-1-
First Amended Complaint
1
2
3
4
5
2.
The acts of patent infringement alleged herein occurred within this
judicial district, Plaintiff resides in this district, and Defendants are subject to personal
jurisdiction in this district. Therefore, venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§
1391(b), (c), and 1400(b).
PARTIES
6
7
3.
Plaintiff EVERYMD (“EVERYMD”) is a partnership of Frank Weyer
8
(“Weyer”) and Troy Javaher (“Javaher”). EVERYMD has a place of business at 2032
9
Whitley Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90068.
10
4.
Defendant RICK SANTORUM (“SANTORUM”) is a Facebook business
11
account holder whose Facebook page has a URL of
12
https://www.facebook.com/RickSantorum. SANTORUM has a place of business at
13
Post Office Box 37, Verona, PA 15147.
14
15
16
17
18
19
5.
Defendant MITT ROMNEY (“ROMNEY”) is a Facebook business
account holder whose Facebook page has a URL of
https://www.facebook.com/mittromney. ROMNEY has a place of business at 585
Commercial St., Boston, MA 02109.
6.
Defendant NEWT GINGRICH (“GINGRICH”) is a Facebook business
20
account holder whose Facebook page has a URL of
21
https://www.facebook.com/newtgingrich. GINGRICH has a place of business at 3110
22
Maple Drive, Suite 400, Atlanta GA 30305.
23
7.
Defendant GOLDMAN SACHS (“GOLDMAN SACHS”) is an
24
underwriter for Facebook, Inc.’s upcoming IPO and a Facebook business account
25
holder whose Facebook page has a URL of
26
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Goldman-Sachs/6023516099. GOLDMAN SACHS
27
has a place of business at 555 California Street, 45th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104.
28
-2-
First Amended Complaint
1
2
3
4
5
6
8.
Defendant J.P. MORGAN (“JP MORGAN”) is an underwriter for
Facebook, Inc.’s upcoming IPO and a Facebook business account holder whose
Facebook page has a URL of https://www.facebook.com/jpmorgancommunity. JP
MORGAN has a place of business at 560 Mission St., San Francisco, CA 94105.
9.
Defendants Does 1 – 1000 are each a presently unidentified one of an
7
estimated 4,000,000 additional Facebook business account holders that are subject to
8
the jurisdiction of this court.
9
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
PATENT INFRINGEMENT PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. 271(g)
10
11
10.
EVERYMD incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 – 7 as though fully
12
set forth herein.
13
11.
EVERYMD has operated the website www.everymd.com since 2001.
12.
EVERYMD’s website at www.everymd.com provides home pages for
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
over 300,000 member doctors and allows patients to obtain information about, send
messages to, and submit comments about those doctors via the doctors’ individual
home pages.
13.
Prior to November 1999, EVERYMD invented numerous novel
technologies during development of its website.
14.
EVERYMD filed U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/447,755 entitled
22
“Method Apparatus and Business System for Online Communications with Online
23
and Offline Recipients” on November 23, 1999.
24
15.
EVERYMD is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 6,671,714 entitled “Method,
25
Apparatus and Business System for Online Communications with Online and Offline
26
Recipients” (“the ‘714 patent”).
27
28
16.
The ‘714 patent is based on the ‘755 application and issued on December
30, 2003.
-3-
First Amended Complaint
1
2
3
4
17.
EVERYMD is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 7,644,122 entitled “Method,
Apparatus and Business System for Online Communications with Online and Offline
Recipients” (“the ‘122 patent”).
5
18.
6
January 5, 2010.
7
19.
8
9
The ‘122 patent is based on the ‘755 application and issued on December
EVERYMD owns additional pending patent applications that are based
on the ‘755 application.
20.
The ‘122 patent is valid and in full force and effect.
21.
EVERYMD has given notice of its patent rights by marking its website at
10
11
12
13
www.everymd.com with the ‘122 patent number.
22.
The ‘122 patent is directed to a novel method for creating individual
14
home pages for members of a group of members that contain controls for sending
15
messages to and for submitting comments about the members.
16
23.
Third party Facebook, Inc. (“FACEBOOK”) utilizes the method of the
17
‘122 patent to create individual home pages (“FACEBOOK PAGES”) for its
18
individual members.
19
24.
In 2011, EVERYMD offered to sell the ‘122 patent to FACEBOOK.
25.
FACEBOOK rejected EVERYMD’s offer, and EVERYMD’s offer has
20
21
22
23
expired.
26.
Defendants each use FACEBOOK PAGES produced by FACEBOOK
24
using the method of the ‘122 patent for commercial purposes by placing
25
advertisements and proportional messages on one or more of such FACEBOOK
26
PAGES.
27
28
27.
FACEBOOK’s use of the method of the ‘122 patent to produce
FACEBOOK PAGES is unauthorized.
-4-
First Amended Complaint
1
2
3
4
5
6
28.
FACEBOOK’s failure to purchase the ‘122 patent or otherwise obtain
rights under the ‘122 patent leaves holders of FACEBOOK business accounts liable
for infringement of the ‘122 patent for unauthorized commercial use of FACEBOOK
PAGES produced by FACEBOOK using the method of the ‘122 patent.
29.
On January 23, 2011, EVERYMD announced a limited time reduced-
7
price patent licensing program under which holders of FACEBOOK business
8
accounts could avoid liability for infringement of the ‘122 patent by voluntarily
9
purchasing licenses to the ‘122 patent for a reduced price of $500 per FACEBOOK
10
business account. EVERYMD’s reduced price voluntary licensing program has
11
ended.
12
13
14
15
30.
None of defendants have taken advantage of EVERYMD’s voluntary
licensing program, which is now no longer available to them.
31.
Defendants each have actual notice of EVERYMD’s patent rights but
Defendants continue to act in conscious and willful disregard of those rights.
16
17
18
19
32.
Defendants’ infringements of EVERYMD’s patent rights have
irreparably damaged EVERYMD and will continue to cause irreparable harm unless
enjoined by the Court.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5-
First Amended Complaint
1
DEMAND FOR RELIEF
2
3
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs ask this Court to:
4
a.
5
6
Enter judgment for EVERYMD against each Defendant on this
Complaint;
b.
Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin each Defendant,
7
and all those in privity with each such Defendant, from further infringement of the
8
‘122 patent during the remaining term of the patent;
9
10
c.
Award compensatory damages to EVERYMD and to increase those
damages three times in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 284;
11
12
d.
Award EVERYMD reasonable attorneys’ fees in accordance with 35
13
U.S.C. § 285;
14
e.
Award EVERYMD interest and costs; and
15
f.
Award EVERYMD such other and further relief as is just and proper.
16
17
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
18
19
Plaintiffs hereby demand a trial by jury of all issues so triable.
20
Respectfully submitted,
TECHCOASTLAW®
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: March 7, 2012
By:
_________________________________
Frank M. Weyer (State Bar No. 127011)
2032 Whitley Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90068
(310) 494-6616
Fax (310) 494-9089
fweyer@techcoastlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff EVERYMD
-6-
First Amended Complaint
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?