Calvin Coolidge Johnson v. E Nixon et al

Filing 37

IN CHAMBERS: ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE: by Magistrate Judge Marc L. Goldman. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing, on or before December 14, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the courts order and for failure to prosecute. Any response to the order to show cause must be accompanied by a proposed opposition to Defendants motion to dismiss. Failure to comply with this order will result in the immediate dismissal of this action without further notice. (rla)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Date Case No. CV 12-1854-ODW (MLG) Title November 21, 2012 Calvin Coolidge Johnson III v. E. Nixon, Jr., et al. Present: The Honorable Marc L. Goldman, Magistrate Judge Ivette Gomez n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: In Chambers: Order Directing Plaintiff to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute On October 1, 2012, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. On October 4, 2012, an order was entered directing Plaintiff to file an opposition on or before October 30, 2012. No opposition has been filed. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing, on or before December 14, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the court’s order and for failure to prosecute. Any response to the order to show cause must be accompanied by a proposed opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Failure to comply with this order will result in the immediate dismissal of this action without further notice. : Initials of Clerk CV-90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL ig Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?