Jorge Torres v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

Filing 28

ORDER REQUESTING MEDIATION STATUS REPORT by Judge Otis D Wright, II:The Court has received Plaintiffs December 12, 2012 mediation status report.(ECF No. 26.) In it, Plaintiff represented that the parties failed to participate in mediation prior to th e Court-ordered December 10 mediation cutoff date (which, the Court notes, supersedes any stipulations by the parties to the contrary). Accordingly, the parties are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE no later than January 28, 2013, why the Court should not sanction both sides for failure to participate in good faith settlement negotiations.The OSC will be discharged upon joint notice that the parties have participated in good faith in mediation. Additionally, the Court will take no further action on Defendants pending Motion for Summary Judgment until the OSC has been discharged. (lc). Modified on 12/12/2012 (lc).

Download PDF
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JORGE TORRES, 12 13 v. Case No. 2:12-cv-01996-ODW(MANx) Plaintiffs, 14 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and DOES 1–10, 15 ORDER REQUESTING MEDIATION STATUS REPORT Defendants. 16 17 The Court has received Plaintiff’s December 12, 2012 mediation status report. 18 (ECF No. 26.) In it, Plaintiff represented that the parties failed to participate in 19 mediation prior to the Court-ordered December 10 mediation cutoff date (which, the 20 Court notes, supersedes any stipulations by the parties to the contrary). Accordingly, 21 the parties are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE no later than January 28, 22 2013, why the Court should not sanction both sides for failure to participate in good- 23 faith settlement negotiations. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 The OSC will be discharged upon joint notice that the parties have participated 2 in good faith in mediation. Additionally, the Court will take no further action on 3 Defendant’s pending Motion for Summary Judgment until the OSC has been 4 discharged. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 December 12, 2012 7 8 9 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?