Jorge Torres v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
Filing
28
ORDER REQUESTING MEDIATION STATUS REPORT by Judge Otis D Wright, II:The Court has received Plaintiffs December 12, 2012 mediation status report.(ECF No. 26.) In it, Plaintiff represented that the parties failed to participate in mediation prior to th e Court-ordered December 10 mediation cutoff date (which, the Court notes, supersedes any stipulations by the parties to the contrary). Accordingly, the parties are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE no later than January 28, 2013, why the Court should not sanction both sides for failure to participate in good faith settlement negotiations.The OSC will be discharged upon joint notice that the parties have participated in good faith in mediation. Additionally, the Court will take no further action on Defendants pending Motion for Summary Judgment until the OSC has been discharged. (lc). Modified on 12/12/2012 (lc).
O
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JORGE TORRES,
12
13
v.
Case No. 2:12-cv-01996-ODW(MANx)
Plaintiffs,
14
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
COMPANY and DOES 1–10,
15
ORDER REQUESTING
MEDIATION STATUS REPORT
Defendants.
16
17
The Court has received Plaintiff’s December 12, 2012 mediation status report.
18
(ECF No. 26.) In it, Plaintiff represented that the parties failed to participate in
19
mediation prior to the Court-ordered December 10 mediation cutoff date (which, the
20
Court notes, supersedes any stipulations by the parties to the contrary). Accordingly,
21
the parties are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE no later than January 28,
22
2013, why the Court should not sanction both sides for failure to participate in good-
23
faith settlement negotiations.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
The OSC will be discharged upon joint notice that the parties have participated
2
in good faith in mediation. Additionally, the Court will take no further action on
3
Defendant’s pending Motion for Summary Judgment until the OSC has been
4
discharged.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
December 12, 2012
7
8
9
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?