Charles C Curtis v. Abb Inc et al

Filing 1044

JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendants Reichhold Industries, Inc., The Okonite Company, Inc., Rogers Corporation, Schneider Electric USA, Inc., Eaton Corporation, and ABB, Inc. (collectively the "Summary Judgment Defendants") shall have judgment in their favor against Plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs claims against the Summary Judgment Defendants are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs claims against all other defendants named in this action are dismissed in accordance with the terms contained in the stipulations for dismissal and orders of dismissal applicable to each of the other defendants named in the action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff take nothing from the Summary Judgment Defendants and that the Summary Judgment Defendants shall have their costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

CHRISTOPHER C. CURTIS,
individually and as Personal
Representative of the Estate of
CHARLES C. CURTIS,

CV 12-2014 PA (FMOx)
JUDGMENT

Plaintiff,

14
V.

15

17

ABB, INC., (individually and as
successor-in-interest to ITE IMPERIAL
CO. f/k/a lIE CIRCUIT BREAKER
COMPANY); et al.,

18

Defendants.

16

19
20

Pursuant to the Court’s July 9, 2013 Minute Order granting the Motions for Summary

21

Judgment filed by defendants Reichhold Industries, Inc., The Okonite Company, Inc., and

22

Rogers Corporation, and the July 15, 2013 Minute Order granting the Motions for Summary

23

Judgment filed by defendants Schneider Electric USA, Inc., Eaton Corporation, and ABB,

24

Inc., and the stipulations for dismissal and the Court’s orders of dismissal for each of the

25

other defendants named in this action by plaintiff Christopher C. Curtis, individually and as

26

Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles C. Curtis ("Plaintiff"), there are now no

27

pending claims against any defendant named in this action.

28

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendants

2 Reichhold Industries, Inc., The Okonite Company, Inc., Rogers Corporation, Schneider
3 Electric USA, Inc., Eaton Corporation, and ABB, Inc. (collectively the "Summary Judgment
4 Defendants") shall have judgment in their favor against Plaintiff.

5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff claims

6 against the Summary Judgment Defendants are dismissed with prejudice.
7

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff claims

8 against all other defendants named in this action are dismissed in accordance with the terms
9 contained in the stipulations for dismissal and orders of dismissal applicable to each of the
10 other defendants named in the action.
11

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff take

12 nothing from the Summary Judgment Defendants and that the Summary Judgment
13 Defendants shall have their costs of suit.
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16 DATED: October 29, 2013
Percy Anderson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

25
26
27
28
-2-