Yvette Pinson v. Americas Wholesale Lender et al

Filing 7

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: RICO CLAIMS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson:The Court hereby orders Plaintiff to file a RICO Case Statement on or before Friday, June 29, 2012. Failure to respond to this Order will result in the dismissal withprejudice of all RICO claims for relief.(see document for specifics). (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 YVETTE PINSON, individuals, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 17 18 AMERICA’S WHOLESALE LENDER, as the Original Lender; CTC REAL ESTATE SERVICE, as the Original Trustee; et al. Defendants. ___________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 12-02028 DDP (MANx) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: RICO CLAIMS 19 20 In this action, Plaintiff’s only federal claims are for 21 violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations 22 provisions of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, 18 U.S.C. § 23 1961, et seq. (“RICO”). 24 a “RICO Case Statement” on or before Friday, June 29, 2012. 25 Failure to respond to this Order will result in the dismissal with 26 prejudice of all RICO claims for relief. 27 28 The Court hereby orders Plaintiff to file The RICO Case Statement shall include the facts that Plaintiff relies on to support her RICO claims for relief. It shall use the 1 numbers and letters set forth below, and for each claim for relief 2 state in detail and with specificity the following information: 3 1. 4 5 State whether the alleged unlawful conduct is in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(a), (b), (c), and/or (d). 2. 6 7 RICO Provision. Defendants. List each RICO defendant and state the alleged misconduct and basis of liability of each defendant. 3. Other RICO Violators. List all alleged RICO violators, other 8 than the defendants listed above, and state the alleged 9 misconduct of each wrongdoer. 10 4. 11 12 Victims. List the alleged victims and state how each victim was allegedly injured. 5. Pattern of Racketeering Activity. Describe in detail the 13 pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful 14 debts alleged for each RICO claim. 15 pattern of racketeering shall include the following 16 information: 17 a. 18 19 A description of the List the alleged predicate acts and the specific statutes which were allegedly violated; b. Provide the dates of the predicate acts, the participants 20 in the predicate acts, and a description of the facts 21 surrounding the predicate acts; 22 c. If the RICO claim is based on the predicate offenses of 23 mail fraud, wire fraud or fraud in the sale of 24 securities, the “circumstances constituting fraud or 25 mistake shall be stated with particularity.” 26 Civ. P. 9(b) (Identify the time, place and contents of 27 the alleged failures to disclose and/or 28 misrepresentations, and the identity of persons to whom 2 Fed. R. 1 and by whom the alleged misrepresentations and/or 2 failures to disclose were made); 3 d. State whether there has been a criminal conviction for 4 violation of the predicate acts and if so, provide 5 particulars; 6 e. State whether civil litigation has resulted in a judgment 7 with respect to the predicate acts and if so, provide 8 particulars; and 9 f. Describe how the predicate acts are both “related” and 10 “continuous” within the meaning of H.J. Inc. v. 11 Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 492 U.S. 229, 239 12 (1989), and its progeny, including Allwaste, Inc. v. 13 Hecht, 65 F.3d 1523, 1527 (9th Cir. 1995). 14 6. Enterprise. Describe in detail the alleged enterprise and 15 specify what structure it had. 16 enterprise shall include the following information: 17 a. A description of the The names of the individuals, partnerships, corporations, 18 associations or other legal entities that allegedly 19 constitute the enterprise; 20 b. 21 22 Whether any named defendants are or were employees, officers or directors of the alleged enterprise; c. Whether you are alleging that the defendants are or were 23 separate from the alleged enterprise, collectively 24 constitute the enterprise itself, or are or were members 25 of the enterprise; and 26 27 d. Whether (and if so how) the enterprise was affected by or benefitted from the pattern of racketeering activity. 28 3 1 7. Interstate or Foreign Commerce. Describe the effect of the 2 activities of the enterprise on interstate or foreign 3 commerce. 4 8. Section 1962(a). If the complaint alleges a violation of 18 5 U.S.C. § 1962(a), provide the following information: 6 a. State who received the income derived from the pattern of 7 racketeering activity or through the collection of an 8 unlawful debt; and 9 10 b. 9. Describe the use or investment of such income. Section 1962(b). If the complaint alleges a violation of 18 11 U.S.C. § 1962(b), provide the following information: 12 a. 13 interest in or control of the alleged enterprise; and 14 b. 15 16 Describe in detail the acquisition or maintenance of any State whether the same entity is both the liable “person” and the “enterprise” under § 1962(b). 10. Section 1962(c). If the complaint alleges a violation of 18 17 U.S.C. § 1962(c), provide the following information: 18 a. 19 enterprise; and 20 b. 21 22 State whether the same entity is both the liable “person” and the “enterprise” under § 1962(c). 11. Section 1962(d). If the complaint alleges a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), describe in detail the alleged conspiracy. 23 24 State who is employed by or associated with the 12. Injury to Business or Property. 25 a. Describe the alleged injury to business or property; and 26 b. Describe the direct causal relationship between the 27 alleged injury and the violation of the RICO statute. 28 4 1 13. Damages. List the damages sustained for which each defendant 2 is allegedly liable. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 Dated: June 21, 2012 DEAN D. PREGERSON United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?