Yvette Pinson v. Americas Wholesale Lender et al
Filing
7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: RICO CLAIMS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson:The Court hereby orders Plaintiff to file a RICO Case Statement on or before Friday, June 29, 2012. Failure to respond to this Order will result in the dismissal withprejudice of all RICO claims for relief.(see document for specifics). (lc)
1
2
O
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
YVETTE PINSON, individuals,
on behalf of themselves and
all others similarly
situated,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
17
18
AMERICA’S WHOLESALE LENDER,
as the Original Lender; CTC
REAL ESTATE SERVICE, as the
Original Trustee; et al.
Defendants.
___________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 12-02028 DDP (MANx)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: RICO
CLAIMS
19
20
In this action, Plaintiff’s only federal claims are for
21
violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
22
provisions of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, 18 U.S.C. §
23
1961, et seq. (“RICO”).
24
a “RICO Case Statement” on or before Friday, June 29, 2012.
25
Failure to respond to this Order will result in the dismissal with
26
prejudice of all RICO claims for relief.
27
28
The Court hereby orders Plaintiff to file
The RICO Case Statement shall include the facts that Plaintiff
relies on to support her RICO claims for relief.
It shall use the
1
numbers and letters set forth below, and for each claim for relief
2
state in detail and with specificity the following information:
3
1.
4
5
State whether the alleged unlawful conduct is
in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(a), (b), (c), and/or (d).
2.
6
7
RICO Provision.
Defendants.
List each RICO defendant and state the alleged
misconduct and basis of liability of each defendant.
3.
Other RICO Violators.
List all alleged RICO violators, other
8
than the defendants listed above, and state the alleged
9
misconduct of each wrongdoer.
10
4.
11
12
Victims.
List the alleged victims and state how each victim
was allegedly injured.
5.
Pattern of Racketeering Activity.
Describe in detail the
13
pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful
14
debts alleged for each RICO claim.
15
pattern of racketeering shall include the following
16
information:
17
a.
18
19
A description of the
List the alleged predicate acts and the specific statutes
which were allegedly violated;
b.
Provide the dates of the predicate acts, the participants
20
in the predicate acts, and a description of the facts
21
surrounding the predicate acts;
22
c.
If the RICO claim is based on the predicate offenses of
23
mail fraud, wire fraud or fraud in the sale of
24
securities, the “circumstances constituting fraud or
25
mistake shall be stated with particularity.”
26
Civ. P. 9(b) (Identify the time, place and contents of
27
the alleged failures to disclose and/or
28
misrepresentations, and the identity of persons to whom
2
Fed. R.
1
and by whom the alleged misrepresentations and/or
2
failures to disclose were made);
3
d.
State whether there has been a criminal conviction for
4
violation of the predicate acts and if so, provide
5
particulars;
6
e.
State whether civil litigation has resulted in a judgment
7
with respect to the predicate acts and if so, provide
8
particulars; and
9
f.
Describe how the predicate acts are both “related” and
10
“continuous” within the meaning of H.J. Inc. v.
11
Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 492 U.S. 229, 239
12
(1989), and its progeny, including Allwaste, Inc. v.
13
Hecht, 65 F.3d 1523, 1527 (9th Cir. 1995).
14
6.
Enterprise.
Describe in detail the alleged enterprise and
15
specify what structure it had.
16
enterprise shall include the following information:
17
a.
A description of the
The names of the individuals, partnerships, corporations,
18
associations or other legal entities that allegedly
19
constitute the enterprise;
20
b.
21
22
Whether any named defendants are or were employees,
officers or directors of the alleged enterprise;
c.
Whether you are alleging that the defendants are or were
23
separate from the alleged enterprise, collectively
24
constitute the enterprise itself, or are or were members
25
of the enterprise; and
26
27
d.
Whether (and if so how) the enterprise was affected by or
benefitted from the pattern of racketeering activity.
28
3
1
7.
Interstate or Foreign Commerce.
Describe the effect of the
2
activities of the enterprise on interstate or foreign
3
commerce.
4
8.
Section 1962(a).
If the complaint alleges a violation of 18
5
U.S.C. § 1962(a), provide the following information:
6
a.
State who received the income derived from the pattern of
7
racketeering activity or through the collection of an
8
unlawful debt; and
9
10
b.
9.
Describe the use or investment of such income.
Section 1962(b).
If the complaint alleges a violation of 18
11
U.S.C. § 1962(b), provide the following information:
12
a.
13
interest in or control of the alleged enterprise; and
14
b.
15
16
Describe in detail the acquisition or maintenance of any
State whether the same entity is both the liable “person”
and the “enterprise” under § 1962(b).
10.
Section 1962(c).
If the complaint alleges a violation of 18
17
U.S.C. § 1962(c), provide the following information:
18
a.
19
enterprise; and
20
b.
21
22
State whether the same entity is both the liable “person”
and the “enterprise” under § 1962(c).
11.
Section 1962(d).
If the complaint alleges a violation of 18
U.S.C. § 1962(d), describe in detail the alleged conspiracy.
23
24
State who is employed by or associated with the
12.
Injury to Business or Property.
25
a.
Describe the alleged injury to business or property; and
26
b.
Describe the direct causal relationship between the
27
alleged injury and the violation of the RICO statute.
28
4
1
13.
Damages.
List the damages sustained for which each defendant
2
is allegedly liable.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
Dated: June 21, 2012
DEAN D. PREGERSON
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?